WHAT ABOUT THE ABDUCTIONS?


A word about 'abductions', an Anglo-Saxon term for alien abductions, which have been taking place for decades. The conspiracy is rife there too. There are two types of kidnappings in the past. Those perpetrated by Satan and his troops to frighten humanity and to associate aliens with evil, which the American evangelists, in particular, like to repeat. Far from being good Christians, often guided by money, they thus convey the plan of Satan who wants to limit, by this fear, the number of elect saved. But there are also those of the 'angels' of God who pursue a very down-to-earth but benevolent goal.

Indeed, since the nuclear era and its effects on the environment, since the proliferation of chemical and bacteriological weapons (covid-19 is a striking example) but also since the agri-food and petrochemical industries (source of many diseases, such as cancer, and physical and mental ailments, growing exponentially) that they have observed to increase in a dizzying way, they, who also see the future, have taken steps to modify the human body in order to adapt it for the times to come.

Without these cellular modifications, by DNA, on the people who will be born at the End of Times, and probably even before, the survival of humanity would be seriously affected, and put in great danger. Earth will become highly toxic. It was therefore necessary to adapt the human body of the future by anticipation, but also that of the animals that feed humanity (many stories of animal mutilations).


This is why, from the birth of this nuclear age, whose explosion of the first bombs served as a galactic siren, attracting them like the emergency services to an accident scene, the 'angels' of God proceeded to large numbers of 'abductions' in order to test various and plethora of future scenarios on human cells. From the sixties, they therefore had to launch a vast campaign of abductions and collect such cells, those devoted to the perpetuation of the race in particular. I am talking about the sexual organs.

Thus, the testimonies of abductions which were legion at the end of the last century painted a very dark picture of extraterrestrial activities, mixing in the minds, the good and the evil. Although the 'abductees' received some warnings about the future of humanity during these meetings, that many ufologists simply considered as influenced by the propaganda of the Cold War, their testimonies were reduced to the invasive and dangerous character of this incongruous presence.


Given the public's disbelief about this bleak future during the Glorious Thirty Years, on the contrary full of promise with the money that flowed freely, the simplistic nature of the reflections at the time reduced this preparatory, benevolent and anticipatory extraterrestrial work, to an alien desire to invade the world. But humanity was and remains the danger, for itself and for the aliens in the spiritual world, not the other way around.


There is a topic that often comes in the debates.

Do the aliens eat people, babies in particular, which would make some people think that Satanists abduct, kill and eat babies? Do the aliens have cookbooks 'to serve humanity', as a famous American movie let us believe? I wondered where this strange and imaginary idea came from, given that aliens visiting us don't need to eat meat at all, a practice that would rapidly change their body, making them unable to materialize and dematerialize.


This probably comes from a simple verse in Rev 12 :


Rev 12 :3-4 Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads. Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth. The dragon stood in front of the woman who was about to give birth, so that it might devour her child the moment he was born.


Provided that most of the people think that the red dragon is evil, which is absolutely NOT the case, on the contrary, the words 'devour her child' is interpreted as Satan eating a newborn, or trying to, in this case. Needless to say that such a meme is irrelevant and opposed to reality.


Why does these verse 4 uses the word 'devour' ?

This word has three meanings in the Bible : 'EAT' (when an animal devours), 'DESTROY' (lands or bodies when locusts or fire devour), and, 'INCLUDE' (when people, nation or someone is devoured).

In the case below, the two small heads (Charlotte and Louis) have the same astrological sign. The first 'devours' the second since seen as one...living creature in Rev 4, a Taurus :


2 Esdras 11:34-35 But the two heads remained, which also ruled over the earth and its inhabitants. And I looked, and behold, the head on the right side devoured the one on the left.


In the case below, the British Empire conquers new lands and make them parts of that Empire:


Daniel 7:7 “After that, in my vision at night I looked, and there before me was a fourth beast—terrifying and frightening and very powerful. It had large iron teeth; it crushed and devoured its victims and trampled underfoot whatever was left. It was different from all the former beasts, and it had ten horns.


At last, in the first case above, Prince William, the red dragon with 7 crowned heads and 10 horns, assisting his wife giving birth to the male child (what really happened), not named George yet (not before two more days), simply welcomes the baby as a Prince of the House of Windsor, HEIR TO THE BRITISH THRONE, BEFORE HIS OWN SON. He, therefore, includes him as Royal in his House, even before seeing him as a common human being, even if from his own human blood.

Remember that for millennia, the kings, or future kings, ALWAYS had the obligation to have royal heirs to maintain their dynasty. ONLY ONE HEIR IS ENOUGH. That is why, Prince George being the first one of the Cambridge's children, this birth is seen as this condition fulfilled. Hence the word 'devour'.

.