Peeping Tom, shot 3 times by Texas girl’s father.

Lawyer's yall ain't.

Deadly force is not justified when ones own life is not potentially in danger.

Creepy, yes. Deadly force, no.

homeowner never blasted the perp on HIS PROPERTY-it's one hafffazz report right down TO THEM chasing the guy OFF HIS PROPERTY to a nearby gas station,playing simon sez as in lie down don't move-- then this man leaving his armed wife to baby sit the perp while HE goes in to the gas station to get a call to 911---huh ? and then the perp gets the gun from the wife,man witnesses-is then in defense of the wife and gives him 3 shots--none life threatening==stupid morans from start to finish.

whats his defense ? was in fear for the wife's life ?
then why the hell was she left w/this criminal INSTEAD OF HER running inside seeking a PHONE ? while he held this perp ?

If you bothered to read the article, you would know that Jorge, was being held at gunpoint by the mother. He attacked her, and took her gun. He pointed it at her and tried to fire, but the safety was on. The father then shot him. A legal shooting.

:lawyered GLP sty:

That said, if the child raping pederast were to hypothetically disappear and you kept your fucking mouth shut and lawyered up, I doubt you would do time. See, without a body or significant evidence, it's going to be hard to get a conviction on a disappeared pedophile. Whom I'm willing to bet had priors for sexual crimes.

See, CSI is bullshit. If you hypothetically beat this fucker to death with a bat or Mozambiqued his ass with two to the chest, one to the head. Took his body out and dumped it in a vertical hole or chopped up and torched the remains, you ain't got a whole lot to go on unless you went to your golf buddy saying, "You know Pedo Bob that was stalking our kids at the park in spite of his three priors and ankle bracelet. Yeah, I killed his ass."

I doubt anyone is going to get a conviction.

*Knock Knock*
Jim Hickok we're with the Dallas County SO. We'd like to talk to you about the disappearance Robert "Pedo Bob" Johnson.

Do you have a warrant?

No sir.

Have a nice day my attorney of record will be in touch with your offices.

The detectives holding this guys jacket will shrug and walkaway. And when Clarence "It'sallgood" Winchester, attorney at law, contacts the DA and says, "local media", "election", "harassment", "civil suit", "wrongful arrest".

The DA calls the detectives and the jacket goes in the bottom of one of those ugly brown legal boxes that are in every courthouse in America.

And unless some deviant child rapist coalition like NAMBLA or the Re-elect Joe Biden Campaign come nosing around with some fucking useless celebrity then I think you're good to go. Hypothetically. I wouldn't recommend it, but, shit happens.

Liberals read the article?

It's Texas.

Charged and convicted are two different things.

Just a few miles from my home…

And the father SHOULD BE CHARGED.

Shot the POS three times and didn’t kill him.. wasting bullets and costing tax payers money to treat the POS, jail him and put him on trial. Father should bare those costs for not doing his job.

And I am dead serious.

As sick as it is you can't just shoot people for being a Peeping Tom ad masturbating. They have to be a direct threat or in the process of stealing your property to shoot them in most cases.

At best the father should have held him at gun point and called the police. Hopefully, the father will get a lenient jury or a suspended/light sentence. After all killing the creep was a crime of impulse and passion.

I'm seriously surprised that the police didn't finish him off

The news title says:

‘Peeping Tom’ shot 3 times by Texas girl’s father is charged: report

The peeping tom was charged, not the father.

Reading is one thing, understanding what you read is another.

Like every single story from "MSN news", this is clearly written by a retard and is full of in insistencies and incoherent blather.

The report, citing court documents, said the girl alerted her parents about a man after he allegedly tapped on her window while touching himself. Her parents, who were not identified, retrieved their guns and confronted the suspect, reports said.

Deputies said the girl’s mother held the man at gunpoint outside the gas station, as the father headed inside to tell the clerk to call 911. But that’s when the suspect began wrestling the woman for her gun. He managed to disarm the woman and pointed her own gun in her direction. But her husband soon raced outside the gas station and fired at the suspect out of fear he’d shoot his

So "her room" is in a gas station?

You will soon be receiving red for linking retardation. Theres enough here already.

What about peeing in another mans house watching him jack off?

Does he deserve to get shot?

I'm not happy.

If the participle or participial phrase comes in the middle of a sentence, it should be set off with commas only if the information is not essential to the meaning of the sentence.

- Sid, watching an old movie, drifted in and out of sleep.

- The church, destroyed by a fire, was never rebuilt.

Note that if the participial phrase is essential to the meaning of the sentence, no commas should be used:

- The student earning the highest grade point average will receive a special award.

- The guy wearing the chicken costume is my cousin.

[link to owl.purdue.edu (secure)]

Come on man ... this is GLP. Reading comprehension is not something that many GLPer's can do. Go with the flow and leave that kind of thinking process behind.

Actually its an article from FOX NEWS!!

Lawyer's yall ain't.

Deadly force is not justified when ones own life is not potentially in danger.

Creepy, yes. Deadly force, no.

He did exactly what he should have done.

Stop defending pedophiles and criminals

In Texas, if you believe there is a life threatening danger, you may use deadly force in defense of others.

You have the luxury of playing Monday morning quarterback. He found a man outside his daughter's window. In that situation, it is reasonable to assume the man had intent to commit harm. I'd be very surprised if the father is even charged, let alone convicted.

Stop molesting the Constitution.

And stop pretending like you are the appointed defender of children. You are just using the children to build an excuse to ignore the Constitution and be able to shot whoever you want to.

I thought you guys were conspiracy theorists.

If I was to shoot someone I suppose accusing them of being a pedo would garner me the most sympathy, right?

SAD that you are all so naiive!

As sick as it is you can't just shoot people for being a Peeping Tom ad masturbating. They have to be a direct threat or in the process of stealing your property to shoot them in most cases.

At best the father should have held him at gun point and called the police. Hopefully, the father will get a lenient jury or a suspended/light sentence. After all killing the creep was a crime of impulse and passion.

the father needs to be charged for aggravated assault and attempted murder

you can't shoot somebody for looking into a window