OP, I think that you’re correct in your assertions, but as I posted on your other thread that you’ve linked above, the “leaked” document doesn’t have any reliable provenance. I’m not saying it isn’t authentic, but there’s no proof that it is, either.

It pays to be careful at this stage of the game, as mis- and disinformation is flying thick and fast around this subject; “the fog of war” being near-impenetrable at times.