Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,190 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 680,217
Pageviews Today: 1,191,209Threads Today: 506Posts Today: 8,507
02:13 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79930863
United States
07/21/2021 11:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Revelation is quite ambiguous.

John of Patmos had a psychedelic vision. Possibly drug induced. Even if directly from God, its still coming through a fallible human conduit.

And prophecy is like looking through a foggy window.

Is it possible that the mark of the beast received on the "right hand" or the "forehead" was in fact a covering of the face and a shot in the arm?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73992218
United States
07/21/2021 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
No religitard. Hand equals deeds. Forehead equals thoughts.

You are marked by your thoughts and deeds.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79930863
United States
07/21/2021 11:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
No religitard. Hand equals deeds. Forehead equals thoughts.

You are marked by your thoughts and deeds.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73992218


And the prevention from buying and selling part?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80365281
United States
07/21/2021 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Jab and taking the forehead temp.
T-Man
Entitled title

User ID: 78270630
Netherlands
07/21/2021 11:45 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Revelation is quite ambiguous.

John of Patmos had a psychedelic vision. Possibly drug induced. Even if directly from God, its still coming through a fallible human conduit.

And prophecy is like looking through a foggy window.

Is it possible that the mark of the beast received on the "right hand" or the "forehead" was in fact a covering of the face and a shot in the arm?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79930863


imagine having a vision about the future that has all sorts of things youve never seen before, like a facemask or a injection.
must be super weird!

sorry, kinda random thought
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78726751
United States
07/21/2021 05:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Biblical prophecy isn't fallible. It's specific and it's exact. If it's not, we're commanded to ignore the prophet, and possibly execute them, depending on whether they meant to intentionally mislead or not.

And there's ZERO evidence of any entheogen use anywhere in the Bible.

The Bible specifically says people will receive a mark in their hand or forehead. No logical person, even on drugs, could somehow misconstrue vaccination in the LEFT ARM (normally the left arm) with a mark in the RIGHT HAND. Vaccines are given in the left arm by default because 90% of the population uses their right, and the arm can be sore for several days afterwards.
Stumpknocker

User ID: 80630158
United States
07/21/2021 05:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Biblical prophecy isn't fallible. It's specific and it's exact. If it's not, we're commanded to ignore the prophet, and possibly execute them, depending on whether they meant to intentionally mislead or not.

And there's ZERO evidence of any entheogen use anywhere in the Bible.

The Bible specifically says people will receive a mark in their hand or forehead. No logical person, even on drugs, could somehow misconstrue vaccination in the LEFT ARM (normally the left arm) with a mark in the RIGHT HAND. Vaccines are given in the left arm by default because 90% of the population uses their right, and the arm can be sore for several days afterwards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78726751


Name of an enzyme in the VAX is Luciferase, which would tie it to the name of the beast as stated in Revelations. It doesn't say it is tattooed or how the name is revealed. It may require some type of scanning on your forehead or right hand to be evident.

I am simply saying that this is a possibility. A possibility that is probable enough to add this to the numerous reasons I don't want a jab.
"I have never understood why it is greed to want to keep the money you've earned, but not greed to want to take somebody else's money"-- Thomas Sowell

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing!
Lime Flavoured Redux

User ID: 72776969
United Kingdom
07/21/2021 05:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Well, except for the fact that 90% of people are jabbed in the left triceps, and masks cover your mouth and nose...
GLP Effect

User ID: 79214079
United States
07/21/2021 05:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Biblical prophecy isn't fallible. It's specific and it's exact. If it's not, we're commanded to ignore the prophet, and possibly execute them, depending on whether they meant to intentionally mislead or not.

And there's ZERO evidence of any entheogen use anywhere in the Bible.

The Bible specifically says people will receive a mark in their hand or forehead. No logical person, even on drugs, could somehow misconstrue vaccination in the LEFT ARM (normally the left arm) with a mark in the RIGHT HAND. Vaccines are given in the left arm by default because 90% of the population uses their right, and the arm can be sore for several days afterwards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78726751


hesright
Pray this prayer to blind Satan:
[link to flameoflove.us (secure)]
Pinochet'sChopperPilo​t

User ID: 79881278
United States
07/21/2021 06:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Revelation is quite ambiguous.

John of Patmos had a psychedelic vision. Possibly drug induced. Even if directly from God, its still coming through a fallible human conduit.

And prophecy is like looking through a foggy window.

Is it possible that the mark of the beast received on the "right hand" or the "forehead" was in fact a covering of the face and a shot in the arm?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79930863


No. If you are going to take the bible literally then take the whole thing literally. Or do you pick and choose which parts of the bible you take literally in order to twist it towards your needs. It was pretty clear about it being in the right hand or forehead.
Come on and take a free ride.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79930863
United States
07/21/2021 06:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Biblical prophecy isn't fallible. It's specific and it's exact. If it's not, we're commanded to ignore the prophet, and possibly execute them, depending on whether they meant to intentionally mislead or not.

And there's ZERO evidence of any entheogen use anywhere in the Bible.

The Bible specifically says people will receive a mark in their hand or forehead. No logical person, even on drugs, could somehow misconstrue vaccination in the LEFT ARM (normally the left arm) with a mark in the RIGHT HAND. Vaccines are given in the left arm by default because 90% of the population uses their right, and the arm can be sore for several days afterwards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78726751


The evidence is the psychotropic plants found growing on Patmos.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79930863
United States
07/21/2021 06:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Revelation is quite ambiguous.

John of Patmos had a psychedelic vision. Possibly drug induced. Even if directly from God, its still coming through a fallible human conduit.

And prophecy is like looking through a foggy window.

Is it possible that the mark of the beast received on the "right hand" or the "forehead" was in fact a covering of the face and a shot in the arm?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79930863


No. If you are going to take the bible literally then take the whole thing literally. Or do you pick and choose which parts of the bible you take literally in order to twist it towards your needs. It was pretty clear about it being in the right hand or forehead.
 Quoting: Pinochet'sChopperPilot


Another literalist and absolutist.
Pinochet'sChopperPilo​t

User ID: 79881278
United States
07/21/2021 09:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Revelation is quite ambiguous.

John of Patmos had a psychedelic vision. Possibly drug induced. Even if directly from God, its still coming through a fallible human conduit.

And prophecy is like looking through a foggy window.

Is it possible that the mark of the beast received on the "right hand" or the "forehead" was in fact a covering of the face and a shot in the arm?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79930863


No. If you are going to take the bible literally then take the whole thing literally. Or do you pick and choose which parts of the bible you take literally in order to twist it towards your needs. It was pretty clear about it being in the right hand or forehead.
 Quoting: Pinochet'sChopperPilot


Another literalist and absolutist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79930863


Either the prophecy was literal or it was not. What you are doing however is picking which parts you parts you like to suit your arguement.
Come on and take a free ride.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80640775
United States
07/21/2021 11:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Jab = right hand, Mask = forehead
Hmm

I jab left, cross right

Follow that up with a spinning back kick

Jab jab cross





GLP