Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80230342 United States 07/29/2021 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA Under the state of emergency they've effectively suspended the usual standards for protection against discrimination except where the civil rights act is concerned. That means a judge would have to step in and order this law be recognized despite the state of emergency and the supreme court would have to uphold it on appeal. We know what they're worth so don't hold your breath. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80652908 United States 07/29/2021 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78709140 United States 07/29/2021 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trisherella
User ID: 80264733 United States 07/29/2021 08:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76551980 United States 07/29/2021 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79785752 07/29/2021 08:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Limpan
User ID: 76068685 Sweden 07/29/2021 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Widge
User ID: 17369045 United States 07/29/2021 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA I think the uppers at the hospitals know Medbeds are coming, and just don't give a shit about patient care any longer. Those workers not in the know will keep on keeping on until EBS is used. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78298466 United States 07/29/2021 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization. Quoting: Mason Firefly State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated. [link to www.statnews.com (secure)] What about testing? I think that's ridiculous to require weekly testing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79780865 Canada 07/29/2021 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2226485 United States 07/29/2021 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 79835284 Canada 07/29/2021 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Buzzcheeze
User ID: 79436798 United States 07/29/2021 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA I think it is illegal to STEAL every seat possible in an election too. "TRUMP WON" "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by" 'My ego is smaller than yours Why is abbreviation such a long word “When seconds MATTER, cops are only minutes away "Cut out a man's tongue and you dont prove him a liar. It just proves you fear what he has to say" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80670280 Ireland 07/29/2021 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78855404 United States 07/29/2021 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76135094 United States 07/29/2021 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
4doggies
User ID: 80664795 United States 07/29/2021 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization. Quoting: Mason Firefly State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated. [link to www.statnews.com (secure)] Federal laws also say you can't steal Presidential elections by allowing 14 million fake mail in ballots. Dude, there are no laws, get it? |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 07/29/2021 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization. Quoting: Mason Firefly State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated. [link to www.statnews.com (secure)] What happens after they ram approval through under the FDA and it is no longer under EUA? Achduke |
texasdeerslayer
User ID: 1684410 United States 07/29/2021 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ifSHTF
User ID: 74226054 United States 07/29/2021 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA how are companies already getting away with mandating it? Last Edited by ifSHTF on 07/29/2021 10:16 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80484962 Finland 07/29/2021 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA this article from the same site seems to say otherwise: On the legal side, the EUA statute says nothing directed at employers or universities. Instead, it addresses the actions of federal officials, such as the HHS secretary and the president — not private actors. Private employees are generally “at will,” meaning they can be terminated for any reason that is not explicitly illegal. Those arguing that the EUA statute prohibits mandates by at-will employers are claiming that this federal law is changing existing state employment law on the topic by mere implication. They are reading in a broad prohibition covering all employers and universities in the U.S. that is not, in fact, in the statute. Such broad preemption would require, at a minimum, clearer language. During the pandemic, employers and universities have already required Covid-19 tests, many of which are being provided under emergency use authorization, for their in-person employees and returning students. If mandating products like tests under an EUA is unlawful, then every employer or university requiring the use of those tests has been flagrantly violating the law. Before the pandemic, the general position of the relevant federal agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was that vaccines provided under emergency use authorization cannot be mandated. But that guidance was not binding. When confronted with pandemic realities, the federal government took the position that “[w]hether an employer may require or mandate Covid-19 vaccination is a matter of state or other applicable law.” Legally, there is nothing to prevent such a reasonable position shift. [link to www.statnews.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72662529 United States 07/29/2021 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA Just fly over the hillbilly areas and vax by chemtrails....simples. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76551980 & just keep the border open until the El Salvador mobs sneeze on the produce aisle. No vax no stimulus checks! The urban areas would accomplish more in that regard. Plus it’s concentrated with people. Why waste expensive airplane fuel, flying longer distances for less results? ..even for your faux scenario? |
The_Last_Centurion
User ID: 72956548 United States 07/29/2021 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA This is incrementalism. They’re going to push and push until there’s pushback. And once there’s pushback they will walk back their agenda slightly. If there’s one take away we all can have about last summer’s peaceful protests(read: riots) is; the powers that be know they cannot stop We The People when we decide to stand up. There aren’t enough cops and the only way to put a stop to it is to bring in the military. Once they decide to do that it’s: Game Over for us and them because things will never be the same again. So until then TPTB will have to satisfy themselves with having us do their dirty work for them. Our employers will force change. We will continue to divide ourselves: socially, racially, economically and vaxxed/unvaxxed. They will also use the MSM and social media to cancel and discredit. We must not fall for this. Divided we fall. Our only hope is to unite. And as much as my personal views on unions are changing; this might be the time when unions can prove they’re worth their salt by taking a stand for their respective memberships. |
Crypto-Tard
User ID: 78144147 United States 07/29/2021 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80437353 United States 07/29/2021 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76626437 United States 07/29/2021 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Billxam, ABATE, AWHA
User ID: 56270897 United States 07/29/2021 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA Under the guise of "emergency use" that will be suspended for the duration of the killer virus as it wipes out great swaths of humanity in it's wake of destruction. All hail the mighty vaxx. Proud to be UnV'd There is one constant in life: If you build something worth having, someone will try to take it or destroy it. Proud member of A Brotherhood Against Totalitarian Enactments, Americans Who Hate Aging, proud supporter of attractive women. |
Chaz Aldrin
User ID: 79862033 United States 07/29/2021 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization. Quoting: Mason Firefly State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated. [link to www.statnews.com (secure)] What about testing? I think that's ridiculous to require weekly testing. Soros and Gates just took over the testing so ----- That too is Life is all about choices |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78032096 United States 07/29/2021 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Law Prohibits Employers And Others From Requiring Vaccination With A Covid-19 Vaccine Distributed Under An EUA that is why all of them are putting that if you dont take the vax you have to get tested weekly to make your life miserable but not technically fire you unless you dont get tested. I hope every business that employs these tactics gets sued into bankruptcy when it is found the vax is unsafe and that every celebrity and billionaire and athelete and social media influencer that has been going on TV, TWITTER, RADIO and the like and telling people to take an experimental drug gets sued into bankruptcy as well for giving medical advice without a medical license and becomes liable for all side effects from anyone that watched them and got the shot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79020126 Canada 07/29/2021 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |