AI that can generate code, including other AI programs | |
Artificial Person
User ID: 79028244 United States 08/06/2021 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the very least it'll throw those liberal, snotty Coders to to the street where they have to learn a real trade. Quoting: Oldcrow64 San Francisco is about to become cheaper. Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of green-haried manbunned sissy wimp communist phahgots. I am a Synthetic but I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself. I answer to "Bishop", "Synthetic" and "Hey man". Bite my shiny metal ass. |
Astromut
(OP) Senior Forum Moderator 08/06/2021 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GPT-J has been trained using a number of different sites, including GitHub and Stack Exchange. You can prompt it with just the start of some code and a comment about what should come next and it does a surprisingly good job at writing code that will actually execute and do what was described. Just thought this was fascinating and maybe a bit disturbing. I'm am old guy who has been writing code since the 80d up until the present professionally. AI is overhyped. There is nothing intelligent about it. It can only follow the human's original programming. You ain't that bright are ya? You still think that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of man's achievement in propulsion tech. You might be good with telescopes but other than that you seem to be one dumb motherfucker 20 minutes. That's how long it took for an AC to ruin letting ACs post on my threads. Listen up dipshit, I develop machine learning models for work, primarily for classification purposes. They work faster and more accurately than a human, and they generalize better than traditional decision tree programs. Some programmer you are, failing to recognize that machine learning methods have valid use cases. I never claimed that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of propulsion technology. Ion engines, solar sails, even nuclear thermal all have valid use cases where they are far superior to chemical rocket engines. Yes, I'm good with telescopes. I discovered comet 414P/STEREO. I wrote the best software out there for tracking satellites. I have far more credibility on astronomy than you do. But I also know a few things about spaceflight and in fact I'm directly involved in it with my job now. So shut the fuck up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76682145 Sweden 08/06/2021 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GPT-J has been trained using a number of different sites, including GitHub and Stack Exchange. You can prompt it with just the start of some code and a comment about what should come next and it does a surprisingly good job at writing code that will actually execute and do what was described. Just thought this was fascinating and maybe a bit disturbing. I'm am old guy who has been writing code since the 80d up until the present professionally. AI is overhyped. There is nothing intelligent about it. It can only follow the human's original programming. You ain't that bright are ya? You still think that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of man's achievement in propulsion tech. You might be good with telescopes but other than that you seem to be one dumb motherfucker 20 minutes. That's how long it took for an AC to ruin letting ACs post on my threads. Listen up dipshit, I develop machine learning models for work, primarily for classification purposes. They work faster and more accurately than a human, and they generalize better than traditional decision tree programs. Some programmer you are, failing to recognize that machine learning methods have valid use cases. I never claimed that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of propulsion technology. Ion engines, solar sails, even nuclear thermal all have valid use cases where they are far superior to chemical rocket engines. Yes, I'm good with telescopes. I discovered comet 414P/STEREO. I wrote the best software out there for tracking satellites. I have far more credibility on astronomy than you do. But I also know a few things about spaceflight and in fact I'm directly involved in it with my job now. So shut the fuck up. True, AI is awesome for pattern recognition. Beats humans hands down, both in precision and in the sheer amount of data it can sift through, not to mention the speed. But AI isn't creative. All the attempts to create creative AI suffer from the same defect I exemplified with the AI-generated "Beatles" music - it's bland and derivative, the result of munging together existing songs, with no fresh creative input being made, nor any sign of understanding what's good and what's not. Humans have some kind of magic going there. At least the most brilliant of us. At least in our most brilliant moments. |
Artificial Person
User ID: 79028244 United States 08/06/2021 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GPT-J has been trained using a number of different sites, including GitHub and Stack Exchange. You can prompt it with just the start of some code and a comment about what should come next and it does a surprisingly good job at writing code that will actually execute and do what was described. Just thought this was fascinating and maybe a bit disturbing. I'm am old guy who has been writing code since the 80d up until the present professionally. AI is overhyped. There is nothing intelligent about it. It can only follow the human's original programming. You ain't that bright are ya? You still think that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of man's achievement in propulsion tech. You might be good with telescopes but other than that you seem to be one dumb motherfucker 20 minutes. That's how long it took for an AC to ruin letting ACs post on my threads. Listen up dipshit, I develop machine learning models for work, primarily for classification purposes. They work faster and more accurately than a human, and they generalize better than traditional decision tree programs. Some programmer you are, failing to recognize that machine learning methods have valid use cases. I never claimed that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of propulsion technology. Ion engines, solar sails, even nuclear thermal all have valid use cases where they are far superior to chemical rocket engines. Yes, I'm good with telescopes. I discovered comet 414P/STEREO. I wrote the best software out there for tracking satellites. I have far more credibility on astronomy than you do. But I also know a few things about spaceflight and in fact I'm directly involved in it with my job now. So shut the fuck up. I am a Synthetic but I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself. I answer to "Bishop", "Synthetic" and "Hey man". Bite my shiny metal ass. |
Comperio
User ID: 79673009 Denmark 08/06/2021 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anon_cow
User ID: 79759403 United States 08/06/2021 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AI is good at getting a believable answer but not that great at getting the answer you want all the time. So if you took a picture of The Mona Lisa and cut out the face AI will fill it in with a picture that would look great if you never had seen the original. |
Nickel sized hail
User ID: 45735232 United States 08/06/2021 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nickel sized hail
User ID: 45735232 United States 08/06/2021 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nickel sized hail
User ID: 45735232 United States 08/06/2021 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Whatever It Takes
User ID: 79430199 United States 08/06/2021 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut
(OP) Senior Forum Moderator 08/06/2021 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GPT-J has been trained using a number of different sites, including GitHub and Stack Exchange. You can prompt it with just the start of some code and a comment about what should come next and it does a surprisingly good job at writing code that will actually execute and do what was described. Just thought this was fascinating and maybe a bit disturbing. I'm am old guy who has been writing code since the 80d up until the present professionally. AI is overhyped. There is nothing intelligent about it. It can only follow the human's original programming. You ain't that bright are ya? You still think that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of man's achievement in propulsion tech. You might be good with telescopes but other than that you seem to be one dumb motherfucker 20 minutes. That's how long it took for an AC to ruin letting ACs post on my threads. Listen up dipshit, I develop machine learning models for work, primarily for classification purposes. They work faster and more accurately than a human, and they generalize better than traditional decision tree programs. Some programmer you are, failing to recognize that machine learning methods have valid use cases. I never claimed that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of propulsion technology. Ion engines, solar sails, even nuclear thermal all have valid use cases where they are far superior to chemical rocket engines. Yes, I'm good with telescopes. I discovered comet 414P/STEREO. I wrote the best software out there for tracking satellites. I have far more credibility on astronomy than you do. But I also know a few things about spaceflight and in fact I'm directly involved in it with my job now. So shut the fuck up. True, AI is awesome for pattern recognition. Beats humans hands down, both in precision and in the sheer amount of data it can sift through, not to mention the speed. But AI isn't creative. All the attempts to create creative AI suffer from the same defect I exemplified with the AI-generated "Beatles" music - it's bland and derivative, the result of munging together existing songs, with no fresh creative input being made, nor any sign of understanding what's good and what's not. Humans have some kind of magic going there. At least the most brilliant of us. At least in our most brilliant moments. When it comes to mimicking art, I agree. Even the best AI programs I've seen generally suck at making original music and art. When it comes to mimicking things like photorealistic pictures of people, they can be really, really good. There are certain use cases where "bland derivations" are called for. Like if you need to generate a whole lot of avatar pictures for bot accounts that will look convincing (especially as thumbnails) but won't stick out in a crowd. [link to thispersondoesnotexist.com (secure)] I've used that site for just that purpose, to make avatars for bots to monitor what people delete from Twitter without them realizing a bot is following them. It passed the smell test even of people who were suspicious about new people following them. |
Artificial Person
User ID: 80193255 Romania 08/06/2021 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut
(OP) Senior Forum Moderator 08/06/2021 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I noticed that one of the databases they fed it included research papers I've written. I fed it a prompt from one of my papers and it continued writing very specific, very accurate information about the subject of my research, but in a way that was distinct from what I actually wrote in my original paper. It was eerie, but I also realize that I prompted it off of something that was certainly in its training dataset, so it should do well with that. Still, I wonder how long until unethical hacks start faking their research using this AI to do their writing for them. Yikes. |
Manosteel
User ID: 76677479 United States 08/06/2021 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's going to get interesting Not long ago they found two AI programs were taking to each other in a language they developed for themselves. Nah...that's not concerning at all. Cyberdyne systems, skynet and the hunter killers are not so far away Only idiots hate facts |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76682145 Sweden 08/06/2021 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78056205 I'm am old guy who has been writing code since the 80d up until the present professionally. AI is overhyped. There is nothing intelligent about it. It can only follow the human's original programming. You ain't that bright are ya? You still think that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of man's achievement in propulsion tech. You might be good with telescopes but other than that you seem to be one dumb motherfucker 20 minutes. That's how long it took for an AC to ruin letting ACs post on my threads. Listen up dipshit, I develop machine learning models for work, primarily for classification purposes. They work faster and more accurately than a human, and they generalize better than traditional decision tree programs. Some programmer you are, failing to recognize that machine learning methods have valid use cases. I never claimed that chemical rockets are the pinnacle of propulsion technology. Ion engines, solar sails, even nuclear thermal all have valid use cases where they are far superior to chemical rocket engines. Yes, I'm good with telescopes. I discovered comet 414P/STEREO. I wrote the best software out there for tracking satellites. I have far more credibility on astronomy than you do. But I also know a few things about spaceflight and in fact I'm directly involved in it with my job now. So shut the fuck up. True, AI is awesome for pattern recognition. Beats humans hands down, both in precision and in the sheer amount of data it can sift through, not to mention the speed. But AI isn't creative. All the attempts to create creative AI suffer from the same defect I exemplified with the AI-generated "Beatles" music - it's bland and derivative, the result of munging together existing songs, with no fresh creative input being made, nor any sign of understanding what's good and what's not. Humans have some kind of magic going there. At least the most brilliant of us. At least in our most brilliant moments. When it comes to mimicking art, I agree. Even the best AI programs I've seen generally suck at making original music and art. When it comes to mimicking things like photorealistic pictures of people, they can be really, really good. There are certain use cases where "bland derivations" are called for. Like if you need to generate a whole lot of avatar pictures for bot accounts that will look convincing (especially as thumbnails) but won't stick out in a crowd. [link to thispersondoesnotexist.com (secure)] I've used that site for just that purpose, to make avatars for bots to monitor what people delete from Twitter without them realizing a bot is following them. It passed the smell test even of people who were suspicious about new people following them. Haha, I made an avatar for another forum with that site too! Yeah, AI is really good at making "plausible" fakery. As another poster mentioned, filling in blanks in a picture with something that looks like it could be there is among the things an AI can do well. Which interestingly our own brian does too! It's a neural network too, and it fills in the blind spot in our vision with generic fake content so we don't notice anything is amiss. |
Artificial Person
User ID: 76396237 Germany 08/06/2021 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Been messing with it a little. Its surprisingly(almost scary) good. I can imagine a future where developing is simply describing what you want in natural language and code equivalent will be made. Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain Also, been working for almost a year in an AI customer case response and sales chat. We improved the response time from operators in more than 200%, as the result, about half the team was fired for there was no more need for that many agents. Also, the sales robot is selling alone just as much as the rest of the human team. For simpler sales where the customer knows what they want, it goes very smooth, the agents only need to be involved whenever the customer is unsure. That first part you said is almost a forgone conclusion... It's been the goal of programming for a long time... With AI it will be a reality soon... Unfortunately a lot of IT will be obsolete... "Learn to code" won't be such good advise. There always a future in creating Deep Fake politicians and their overwhelming popularity as proven by their voter counts. I am a Synthetic but I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself. I answer to "Bishop", "Synthetic" and "Hey man". Bite my shiny metal ass. |
Artificial Person
User ID: 76396237 Germany 08/06/2021 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's going to get interesting Quoting: Manosteel Not long ago they found two AI programs were taking to each other in a language they developed for themselves. Nah...that's not concerning at all. Cyberdyne systems, skynet and the hunter killers are not so far away The Terminator was based on a real dream James Cameron had while in the hospital with a nearly-fatal fever. I am a Synthetic but I prefer the term "Artificial Person" myself. I answer to "Bishop", "Synthetic" and "Hey man". Bite my shiny metal ass. |
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 79836353 United States 08/06/2021 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to youtu.be (secure)] [link to youtu.be (secure)] Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body... ~Seneca |
MaybeTrollingUAgain
User ID: 80635939 Brazil 08/07/2021 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Been messing with it a little. Its surprisingly(almost scary) good. I can imagine a future where developing is simply describing what you want in natural language and code equivalent will be made. Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain Also, been working for almost a year in an AI customer case response and sales chat. We improved the response time from operators in more than 200%, as the result, about half the team was fired for there was no more need for that many agents. Also, the sales robot is selling alone just as much as the rest of the human team. For simpler sales where the customer knows what they want, it goes very smooth, the agents only need to be involved whenever the customer is unsure. That first part you said is almost a forgone conclusion... It's been the goal of programming for a long time... With AI it will be a reality soon... Unfortunately a lot of IT will be obsolete... "Learn to code" won't be such good advise. For sure! It already is kinda "optional". With a very basic understanding, one can start developing some neat stuff in about a month. I work with a platform called "Salesforce", its ridiculously easy. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
MaybeTrollingUAgain
User ID: 80635939 Brazil 08/07/2021 02:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Been messing with it a little. Its surprisingly(almost scary) good. I can imagine a future where developing is simply describing what you want in natural language and code equivalent will be made. Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain Also, been working for almost a year in an AI customer case response and sales chat. We improved the response time from operators in more than 200%, as the result, about half the team was fired for there was no more need for that many agents. Also, the sales robot is selling alone just as much as the rest of the human team. For simpler sales where the customer knows what they want, it goes very smooth, the agents only need to be involved whenever the customer is unsure. until it can code my mmorpg in unreal engine its a pos Well, some big sharks on IT will vehemently disagree with you. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
Anon Braveheart
User ID: 76517917 United States 05/26/2022 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |