Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers?

Users Online Now: 2,196 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 1,113,418
Pageviews Today: 1,859,174	Threads Today: 764	Posts Today: 13,372
06:09 PM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers?
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? It's been a thought provoking needle in my cranium for weeks now. How is it connected to the agenda, what's the angle? This is also assuming the vaxx is deadly for everyone. The only theory I have at this point is that it's somehow connected to the ELE side of the depopulation agenda (also assuming depop possibly is the ELE). If we are facing an ELE then I can see them wanting as few babies and toddlers to take care of as possible in the aftermath, where as children under 12 are far easier to care for, are closer to breeding age and of course prime age for the elite pedo fucks running the show. Your thoughts?

Anonymous Coward User ID: 18562714 United States 08/11/2021 08:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? It’s safe for the mother. The fetus don’t count as a human. It’s about the fact that no children die from covid so there is no benefit to them. EUA requires there be a clear benefit.
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? for air time
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? It’s safe for the mother. The fetus don’t count as a human. It’s about the fact that no children die from covid so there is no benefit to them. EUA requires there be a clear benefit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18562714 The vaxx is deadly, for EVERYONE.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18562714 United States 08/11/2021 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? It’s safe for the mother. The fetus don’t count as a human. It’s about the fact that no children die from covid so there is no benefit to them. EUA requires there be a clear benefit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18562714 The vaxx is deadly, for EVERYONE. Quoting: Daniel's Window Maybe so. That hasn’t clearly been established yet.
BRIEF User ID: 79662918 United States 08/11/2021 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? Unborn human babies have no rights! EVIL!! I never forgive and I never forget I am a licensed firearm holder. I will, under protection of law, use lethal force if attacked.
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? It’s safe for the mother. The fetus don’t count as a human. It’s about the fact that no children die from covid so there is no benefit to them. EUA requires there be a clear benefit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18562714 The vaxx is deadly, for EVERYONE. Quoting: Daniel's Window Maybe so. That hasn’t clearly been established yet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18562714 I meant to add, IMO.
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 08:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? Unborn human babies have no rights! EVIL!! Quoting: BRIEF Sometin fucky goin on, for sure Brief.
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? Guessing this isn't a proper topic for the morning crowd, too much before your coffee? C'MON MA'AN!
PinkOrchid- AUDIT,AUDIT,AUDIT. User ID: 35888511 Australia 08/11/2021 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? Most under 12 haven't reached pubity. That give you a clue? Reproduction Warning proceeding to read this may cause anxiety, poster is indemnified if you proceed. I can't give you the ultimate truth ,it's all a matter of perspective and spin. So I empower you with the gift of discernment. SEE THE TRUTH , KNOW THE TRUTH, FEEL THE TRUTH

Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80105356 United States 08/11/2021 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Meat for the Beast: Why is the vaxx promoted as unsafe for children under 12, yet safe for pregnant mothers? Most under 12 haven't reached pubity. That give you a clue? Reproduction Quoting: PinkOrchid- AUDIT,AUDIT,AUDIT. I mentioned that in the theory, actually.
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP