HUUUGGGEEEE Phizer STUDY CUT SHORT... CLINICAL TRIALS DOT GOV

They dont need to do any studies since every government around the world allowed the vaccines manufacturers to have NO LIABILITY at all.

So why carry out expensive and long studies when you dont have to.

They've been given a green light to injure and kill as many as they want and no one can sue them or hold them accountable. Its an investors wet dream.

I just read every word of the FDA approval letter to Pfizer. Be very aware of the exact syntax of the words chosen in that letter. Words mean things, every word.

The letter approves of:

1. The MANUFACTURING.

2. Timetable for long term effects data gathering. Most have the time table of 2024 for completion.

3. Nowhere does the letter state the product is approved for patient USE or medical authority USE.

Well said…. Succinct and spot on.

Bought off, like in the scI-fi movie Utopia.

Dollars over safety=government and pharmaceutical.

and people still dont rise up lmao its amazing, Americans have become weak.

Too many are starting to figure it out and making others aware.

So scandalous! Rules and laws and normalcy have been replaced with this clown world madness. The planet has been taken over.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

The killed off group?

A doctor tried to sell me with excitement about the FDA approval this morning...

Someone at the FDA is brilliant. They just opened the door for thousands upon thousands of lawsuits. Vaccine mandates will be gone in six months, I'd give that 3 to 1 odds.

Yes it is totally misleading: the article refers to trials of the Moderna vax, not the Pfizer one. Still an issue for them but nothing to do with today’s FDA announcement - unless (which I expect) there is evidence presented to show the Pfizer trial is a joke too.

They also specify approval for “protection against” C19, which it was never intended to do

Yup.
Exactly.
This is why they are in a panic.

Stay calm my friends.

Oh they will be held accountable all right.
Don’t you worry.

On the last line it's called an "RNA Vaccine". So they can say it's actually a vaccine.

No. The unvaxxed group with no COVID deaths. Really bad optics when compared to a vaxxed group with serious injuries and deaths.

Pfizer is a manufacturer and does not treat patients. So I would not expect to see authorization for them to use it.

I don't know how the authorizations work, though. Does the FDA issue another authorization for physicians to administer it? How do they authorize flu shots to be administered by non-medical sites like CVS with no doctor present?

Last Edited by oniongrass on 08/23/2021 03:06 PM

Added to the wayback machine.



/web/20210823191143/ [link to clinicaltrials.gov (secure)]

And no where in the insert sheet is there anything of what is in the poison they call a vax. All who have lost members should sue the hell out of them and PF.
This will spark a war on them. Are they ready?

FDA approves drugs for specific (on-label) use. FDA does not control who administers approved drugs. The FDA approval letter states the on-label use of the drug.

If they lower the population, they can seize all the dead people's stuff. Free real estate up for grabs, no one to defend it.

More subtle than a neutron bomb.

Yup because by then everyone would know the clot shots are bad. This is why they rammed it out in 6 months.

For the record, 2023 was already pretty short test period. Normally it is 10 to 12 years.

They made it 6 months. This tells us THEY KNOW ITS bad.

It's modern day equivalent of Jim Jones kool aid, but it's a slow kill.

I like the way you think outside of the box.

Yeah they are definitely laughable idiots. But "science" right?! Lmao fucking unscientific unprofessional retards need to die sooner than later!

bump

LOL! And you expect the same courts that put pedo Joe at 1600 Penn. to side with you? Dream on.

Exactly.

Of all things they made up, this was always the least credible. You can cut red tape and R&D time but no way to speed this up without a time machine.

So cancel it so it doesn't provide any favorable results and can now only harm the urgent need to mandate.

Cause it's "safe."

L-O-L.

Which brings me my next question.... informed consent... those blank inserts in the current " va xx ines" should list ALL potential side effects and ALL ingredients.....not the crap on the CDC approved informational sheet....I want to see the insert now!!!!