Comirnaty Vax IS approved ?

It's 'approved' but completely unavailable. In the meantime, we're supposed to continue with the other ones under extended EUA. Of course, next to no one understands that and they're not supposed to.

Furthermore, FDA wants a study on the effects on the heart caused by Cormirnaty to be completed by Oct 2025.

It's all bait and switch, and lies.

Last Edited by Nexus-9 on 09/11/2021 09:03 AM

Okay, that makes more sense.

I am not a lawyer but the approval letters are very short and I cannot see how anyone can misconstrue that the August 23rd letter to Eliza Harkins in any way approved the existing Pfizer mRNA injections. It explicitly states that the Emergency Use Authorization is being extended. But the current administration is playing the charade that it is approved and now it can mandate the use of it.

[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]

Again, although I am not a lawyer I do spend an inordinate amount of time looking at legal documents. I have expected legal challenges to the mandating of an EUA shot, but none have been formed.

?

Comirnaty is a Pizer jab product that has gotten "provisional" approval outside the US in some locations. That said, Comirnaty is virtually identical to the experimental version in the US and distributed in a majority of western countries.

Since it is largely the same, let's take a peek at some of the known ingredients of the secret sauce:

Contains graphene oxide, mrna vaccine for covid-19 (BNT162b2) does induce the body, with RNA, to begin replicating a "protein" for the virus. The "protein" circulates throughout the body and collects in a variety of organs, and is able to cross the blood-brain barrier.

While it's largely the same, they do maintain a legal distinction and I will milk that legal distinction at every opportunity. Speaking of which, they have sneakily removed the 'legal distinction' language from the approval document without any note of revision. Imagine that.