Breaking - ABC WHPB "The President Would Declare a National Emergency-Would The Military help?" Then Feed Cuts to La Palma 2.5 min

Well they have two choices; they can make it up as they go along or they can follow documented guidance and policy.

Wow that was creepy.

I was just on a YouTube channel with a live feed of the La Palma volcano and I asked what they thought of the Jen Psaki press conference cutting to a live feed of the volcano...

Without warning they put me in "timeout" which takes away my ability to post during the live chat.



Last Edited by notinfallible on 10/14/2021 12:00 PM

LOL.

I think of the phrase:

"Don't mistake malice for incompetence."

The East Coast deserves a big wake-up call, but Cumbre Vieje blasting into fragments likely won't be it.

However, some technicians at ABC or elsewhere (hackers?) may have purposefully inserted that segment in as a goof, to mock the sociopathic slimeballs occupying the White House and elsewhere.

Probably a warning by the DS, “If you don’t do as we say, well, then...”

What’s the channel name?

West coast China,North China,east coast tsunami,bomb or frequency triggered,South isis, un and islam through out the country. Lovely just lovely.
Wakey little chitlins time to get up.

Volcanoverse

Volcanoverse

Sorry... should have quoted the question that I answered.

Ok thanks

Transcript:

Is there any consideration that the President would declare a national emergency, have the military help with this kind of thing, or get money from the National Defense Fund to try to help these companies that are now having to work overtime hours with labor shortages?

MS. PSAKI: Well, we are continuing to press and look for ways that we can address the bottlenecks in the supply chain, and this is an important and vital step. We want to, of course, give the time to implement it, to your point, but we will continue to look for any additional steps we can take to ease the burden on families across the country.

Q And then, if the President has also pointed to this situation as a good reason to pass the bipartisan hard infrastructure bill, why then did he not push for a vote on that bill when he had a chance a couple of weeks ago so that this time could be truncated a little bit?

MS. PSAKI: Well, because you need the majority of people in Congress to vote for something in order to sign it into law. And also because, as it relates to addressing a range of issues in our economy — as much as wages are up and unemployment are down, we — unemployment is down — we also recognize there are longer-term issues we want to address, including inflation.

And that is something — while it is going to come down next year, and those are their predictions — the Build Back Better agenda, the President’s economic agenda will help bring that down. That is what 17 Nobel laureates have told us and have told all of you. So, he wants his entire agenda passed, and that’s what he thinks will be good for the economy long term.

And you, of course, need the majority of votes in both Congresses to get that done.

Go ahead.

Q In sort of a summary of this: You know, Presidents get blame or credit for a whole range of things that they may not have direct control over.

MS. PSAKI: Yeah.

Q Is there a sense in the White House here that the President could be blamed for a frustrating holiday season or shopping season if these goods don’t flow? Is that an active concern that’s motivating some of these steps?

MS. PSAKI: Well, I think, Kelly, what’s motivating some of these steps is the President wants to get — ensure the American people are able to order goods, they’re able to get toys delivered to their home, they’re able to go to the grocery store and be able to afford meat and any goods that they want.

He understands and we all understand that daily cost — as much as wages have gone up, as much as unemployment has gone down, as much as a lot of progress has been made on the economy — he understands these are issues that are impacting people in their day-to-day lives.

I also — in response to an earlier question, you know, we can’t overpromise here. And I’m not going to do that from here because there are a lot of issues in the global supply chain. We knew that from the first day. That’s why he set up this task force. That’s why this has been a top priority. And we’ve been attacking those issues one by one, because we know they have different challenges and different solutions.


[link to www.whitehouse.gov (secure)]

I believe it was the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 that not only allows for a military response to a national emergency, but, let's the military define autonomously what the response will be, and more ominously, lets the military define what a national emergency is, or, constitutes - again, autonomously, or, without civilian governmental input. We live under a military dictatorship

I'm not sure either, but then, respectfully, this is GLP...

It would be all but impossible to generate one that large with a bomb. In fact, it would require a line of bombs detonated simultaneously to generate a local tsunami.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

If you got a job at a national news channel, the pinnacle of jobs, would you risk it skimpy to "mock" others?

No, it was ether someone at ABC who was trying to warn us, OR the feed was hacked.

As one would split stones.

This!! It's like we are living a movie.

2001

I'm leaning toward this. It's the least scary. My mind can't take much more world craziness.

Fucking bad ass! The deep states emergency broadcasting system is in full swing!!!

Which reporter asked the question "Is the President ready to declare a national emergency?", right before it cut to La Palma? If that reporter works for ABC, then they knew the question was coming up in advance, and the cut was intentional.

I would theorize that ABCNEWS had put in a voice recognition setting that IF from the white PRess Room the words "President declare National Emergency" was ever spoken It would cut immediatly to their live shot of La Palma.

This is exactly what happened.


But this time there was no emergency.....as nothing has happened yet...but....IT does show that there may be some advanced knowledge of impending doom that we are not privy to that they know About...

Thank You ABCNEWS!

No bombs needed these days. Thats so cavemanish.
Todays global weapon of choice in case you havent figured it out yet, is particle beam weapons! Newsome Knows!

Its how you know things are going hot, because one side is on their last leg and have never been more desperate.

Not anymore, every thing has a 'soft switch' and is really on all the time in some state waiting for the user to hit a button.

Last Edited by Reebl on 10/14/2021 12:43 PM

If the military takes over the trucking, how is that different from them seizing all the goods?
We can just trust it will all go to Walmart...

Well, guess what, meet the new “greeters” at the health-pass/ration gates...

All done a little bit at a time so the sheep follow the narrowing chute.

I guess this would be their only warning, foreshadowing is all it takes to see the signs