PUBLISHED!!!! Vikings were in North America by 1021!

Obviously they established new trade routes, but 100% Columbus gets the recognition because he set up colonies

It's like American landing on the moon and planting a flag

This is the man that deserves the most praise today. He’d been ostracized over his beliefs on the Vikings. He’s the one that pushed this subject hard about 10 years ago. Scott Wolter.

Yale Harvard Cambridge had studies on in the 1980s

[link to curiosmos.com (secure)]



Also released today.


Conclusions

The results of the study showed that AD 1021 represents the only reliable date for when Vikings were present in America. Scholars noted that Icelandic sagas point to contact between Vikings and the indigenous peoples of North America. Probably, this could lead to the spread of pathogens, the introduction of various species of flora and fauna, as well as to the exchange of genes, which remains to be clarified in future studies.



From above paragraph. “1021 represents the only reliable date for when Vikings were present in America.”

Now that the first FACT has been proven beyond feelings, doubts and just old fashioned “ I knew that” , it is now forcefully accepted and the dominoes should tumble.

Norse didn't give the maps to the Spaniards.

Spaniards took South America. England North America.

And not just Vineland.

Vikings had a trade route in Mexico. They knew about the colored roads.

Spain had colonies in north America in Florida and Texas ... The french had colonies in north America.. so did the Dutch and English

All of medieval Europe was trying to get a piece of the pie

They have actual artifacts. There’s tale of a pristine sword in one of their collections but they couldn’t prove a Viking brought it. No one could prove anything without today’s technology. That’s why it’s such a great day! GLP fans were right again.

Again academia and mainstream media are not on the same page

Every single reputable University in the country has said that the Vikings discovered North America in the 11th century

Every single one

The discovery announcement last month of footprints almost 10,000 years older than previously thought of the oldest inhabitants 13,000 years ago. With the talk of trade routes used by Vikings into Mexico, makes me wonder if they were established for millennium.

[link to nypost.com (secure)]

Then you’re aware that they teach it wasn’t the Vikings first. The actual debate is if the Irish did it 2-300 years first. “ Voyage of St. Brendan the Abbot” is a story that tells a different version. The ivys believe it to be true. And they teach it. Doesn’t make it true till they can PROVE IT and not just believe it because of a diary.

Unfortunately, I wish people did listen to academia. They don’t. They despise it. Old people will continue to say Columbus. Young people will continue to say colonization. And the Indians of today were first ( they weren’t )

Ummm I have master's degree in early American history

There is not one University in the country that teaches that the Irish founded North America

You've at least been honest this entire time but now you're lying

Just because that's some people's opinion ..its absolutely not taught in any University

It is absolutely taught that the Norseman discovered Greenland and North America

We were in the Americas long before that.

We were in the Americas before the American Indians (you know the ones falsely called Native Americans) ever set foot in the Americas.


Thread: Scientists discover DNA proving original Native Americans were White

Of course you'll never hear about this stuff on TV or school or college.

Here’s a list of 25 huge news items that were believed by crackpots. Msm made fun of the conspiracy theorists. So did our government. Many KNEW these to be true but that’s NOT the same as proof. Many of these subjects were actually taught in universities as fake. All were true.

[link to bestlifeonline.com (secure)]

Must be way older than you. We learned about this in 8th grade Latin. It was taught at my podunk university and we staged a debate on it. Copy paste the title and you’ll find many not just believing it. They claim as fact. ( without proof ). Btw the debate didn’t include Vikings as that was thought too outside the box in 1980. The other side of the debate was Polynesians.

I also went to Irish catholic schools. I just thought this was a common LARP by Irish people claiming to be the first here. Maybe it’s true.

The Los Lunas, Hidden Mountain Decalogue Stone.

The writing is in Paleo-Hebraic, the same character shape of the letters as was in use during Solomon's Reign...

1 Kings 9:26
And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom.

27
And Hiram sent in the navy his servants, shipmen that had knowledge of the sea, with the servants of Solomon.

28
And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought it to king Solomon.

Ophir is an unknown location, but in the time of Solomon it was thought of as being overseas.

420 Talents

...

Last Edited by SonOfZion on 10/20/2021 10:46 PM

This discussion has me wondering. Yup. Africans claim they were first.

[link to howafrica.com (secure)]

The Chinese? Yup

[link to www.npr.org (secure)]

5 years ago <50%

Sixth Century — Irish Monks: This "theory" is actually more of a legend. A sixth-century Irish monk named Saint Brendan supposedly sailed to North America on a currach — a wood-framed boat covered with animal skin. His alleged journey is detailed in the ancient annals of Ireland. Brendan was a real historical figure who traveled extensively in Europe. But there is no evidence that he ever made landfall in North America.

In 1976, writer Tim Severin set out to prove that such a journey was possible. Severin built the Brendan, an exact replica of a sixth-century currach, and sailed along a route described by the traveling monks. He eventually landed in Canada.

10th Century — The Vikings: The Vikings' early expeditions to North America are well documented and accepted as historical fact by most scholars. Around the year 1000 A.D., the Viking explorer Leif Erikson, son of Erik the Red, sailed to a place he called "Vinland," in what is now the Canadian province of Newfoundland. Erikson and his crew didn't stay long — only a few years — before returning to Greenland. Relations with native North Americans were described as hostile.

This much had long been known from the Icelandic sagas. But until 1960, there was no proof of Erikson's American sojourns. That year, Norwegian explorer Helge Ingstad and his wife, archaeologist Anne Stine Ingstad, unearthed an ancient Norse settlement. During the next seven years, the Ingstads and an international team of archaeologists exposed the foundations of eight separate buildings. In 1969, Congress designated Oct. 9 as "Leif Erikson Day."

15th Century — The Chinese: This theory is espoused by a small group of scholars and amateur historians led by Gavin Menzies, a retired British Naval officer. It asserts that a Muslim-Chinese eunuch-mariner from the Ming Dynasty discovered America — 71 years before Columbus. Zheng He was a real historical figure, who commanded a huge armada of wooden sailing vessels in the early 15th century. He explored Southeast Asia, India and the east coast of Africa using navigational techniques that were, at the time, cutting edge.

But Menzies, in his best-selling 2003 book, 1421: The Year China Discovered America, asserts that Zheng He sailed to the east coast of the United States, and may have established settlements in South America. Menzies based his theory on evidence from old shipwrecks, Chinese and European maps, and accounts written by navigators of the time. Menzies' scholarship, though, has been called into question. Many of his claims are presented "without a shred of proof," says historian Robert Finlay, writing in the Journal of World History. Indeed, most historians say the "China first" theory is full of holes.




Well well. It’s not so obscure after all

The Tel Dan inscription was written around 1000 BCE. Since the Los Lunas inscription uses the same script, it is safe to conclude that the Los Lunas inscription was written by a Hebraric people about 3,000 years ago. Other ancient Hebraic inscriptions have been found around the country including Tenessee and the Mississippi Valley.

ancient-_____.org/inscriptions/the-los-lunas-inscription.htm
​

_____ < the language of Israel

In the quote it occurs twice, changed to Hebraic, not banned yet

Last Edited by SonOfZion on 10/20/2021 11:09 PM

I was taught in 8th grade American History that Vikings were here first

Yea. We spent a whole page quibbling over semantics. The entire point of the article is we have as close to as actual proof you can get. Instead of most scholars agreeing on it, it’s now factual for scholars to disprove.

I believe the Americas were always a melting pot, and that the natives are not homogeneous, they each have different ties to different continents and peoples.

The oceans turn in great circles...

My ancestors were some of the first French in Nova Scotia, and according to research, we should be 11% native. They married native women, and gave them Christian names.

My guess would be that Amerigo was named after the Americas and not the other way around.

I believe that Europeans mined the Americas going way way back, and that it was a military secret.

I also think that the ancient Egyptians knew of the Americas, isn't there talk of New World things found with mummies? I forget exactly...like chocolate or cocaine or tobacco?

Last Edited by Eilonwy on 10/21/2021 08:47 AM

There is, somewhere on the interwebs or published in a book...
A guy went around New England and measured all the stone walls and did some math and made a very good case for them not being possibly built in the time period that the narrative allows.

You can't really copy them either. They have an air of ancientness that can't be duplicated.

In New England there are some strange artifacts like American Stonehenge in NH and Viking runes in Westford MA.

I often wonder if New England is prone to tidal waves, such as the type La Palma could instigate, and that possibly early pre-historical agricultural settlements from Europe were wiped clean.

Perhaps when the coast gets wiped out the remaining colonists just disappeared into the hunter-gatherer base of Natives.

The rocky walls of Martha's Vineyard look so much like those seen in the British Isles, with "lace tops" to peer through.

Last Edited by Eilonwy on 10/21/2021 08:36 AM

I also sometimes don't believe that the North Eastern Native Americans didn't have things like the wheel. The stories of them seem artificially primitive.

Well...anyone with a genetic predisposition of the HFE gene which renders the risk of hemochromatosis can thank the Vikings....

That’s some good stuff.

Interesting you bring up the Egyptians
Especially since the evidence definitely points to the Ancient Egyptians being white.



In particular there seems to be a strong connection to Ancient Egypt in the Grand Canyon.

I actually made a post about it in another thread a couple months ago.

Here it is.




I remember a thread that sadly deleted. In it someone mentioned a theory of the Grand Canyon possibly being an ancient mine or quarry.

The fact that so many areas of the Grand Canton are off limits really makes you so def what they're hiding.

Here's some blonde mummies found in Peru and stone head in Guatemala.

[link to youtube.com (secure)]

Sorry couldn't post the video on here, so click the link.