DEFAMATION BY IMPLICATION: The Associated Press 'Strawmans' Project Veritas

TAKE THEM DOWN!

YOU BETTER LAWYER UP BIG PHARMA!

- - - - - -

This is exactly why we're so divided. Journalism is dead - they all have an agenda. When the facts don't fit the agenda, journalists use a series of fallacies and minutia to nitpick the truth and assert their narrative.

People are forced to choose. The critical thinkers pursue the truth, and the lazy people obey the media narrative. Ironically, the media is the loudest voice decrying the "division" in the country, when of course they are causing it through lies, slander and libel.

The AP is too big to sue out of existence (and has nation-state fiat backing), but I hope PV can get enough of a settlement to cover a lifetime of operations. Still, justice is dead, so the odds of that happening are exactly 0.

It’s dead because we all carry cell phones. Do I want to see the cell video on Fox? No. I just want to see the unedited video. Make my own mind up. All of us do know how to think. That’s why media is dying. Those people don’t produce anything for society. The only need for media and journalists is actual breaking news for information to help people. That’s it.


So instead of learning how to code, they invent shit for clicks.

I don't agree with that one bit. James Okeefe, John Solomon and Sarah Carter prove how critical investigative journalism is, especially today. They also prove how big of a market there is for real journalism.

CNN's doubling down on propaganda despite plummeting ratings proves it's not about clicks - they're not funded by viewers. They have an agenda.

At the very least, journalism's traditional role is to sort through all of the noise in everyday life to decide what's newsworthy. That's before considering the importance of investigative journalists digging deep and finding the truth.

Last Edited by Depluribus Unum on 10/21/2021 12:13 PM

Never forget that o Keefe's LATEST Facebook "whistleblower" is a shill demanding more censorship, more of people being visited by law enforcement for stuff they say online, and "internet id's"

Okeefe isn't your fucking friend, he's a muck raking asshole

shutup and stop lying,
That was not 0'keefes whistleblower
she got a 60 minutes special and a senate meeting.

Veritas whistelblowers get no such treatment.

What I'm saying is that we have to be careful with whistleblowers all around.

ESPECIALLY if they're telling us what we want to hear.

There's a level of fuckery present everywhere that's just off the charts and believing we can't be manipulated is the first step in us getting manipulated.

That wasn't O'Keefe's whistleblower. She was as legit as Ballsey Ford or Ciaramella. That was a Facebook/CIA plant to give the emerging tyranny an excuse to greenlight mass censorship.

They exploited the "whistleblower" label because real whistleblowers have become the most respected form of information ever since the MSM abandoned journalism.

Last Edited by Depluribus Unum on 10/21/2021 01:42 PM

That's why we have to rely on the leaked raw documents. The Gelman emails speak for themselves, just like the Hasbro videos, the border policies, and Olzchewski's audio recordings.

Credible people say "Don't believe me, look at the documents."

Unfortunately, critical thinking is a lost art. The sheeple prefer to listen to Siri and Alexa, and their short attention spans would never allow them to fact check anything. So long as tech oligarchs control the content, nothing will change

Sue them! Stop talking and sue!!!

As far as I know, Pfizer has not put their ingredients out, I do know they had protein from some source. Why did they change it at right before they manufactured it? This is also out there; this is what I want to know. I would take it for all the tea in China, who are all on the board of Pfizer.

Testing with a murdered child from the womb is the same thing as using it in the vaccine in my beliefs.

Last Edited by hankie on 10/21/2021 03:00 PM