How they control all points of view using fear

We all know the surface layer after taking the red pill...

If you believe in voting "blue", you are told that those who vote "red" are rich and don't want to use their tax money to support those living off of the government.

If you believe in voting "red", you are told that those who vote "blue" are willing to sell our their liberties in exchange for some kind of social handout.

Here is an example:

If you want to get money from the government for let's say a disability, you are going to have to let them look in your bank account if they want to and if you have over a certain amount of money, they will turn off your check, for instance.

Let's say you want to get married and your spouse has a little money. Now, they are part of your household and if you get a check, you have to report all your household's income to the government. Your spouse might not be disabled and may not be reliant on the government, but their information now becomes invaded by the government and could effect your check, so...

People on disability who have a partner, as a result, may choose not to get married and not to report them as part of their household in order to allow them not to have to report to the government and give up their right to privacy.

As a result, the disabled person receiving a check, not only gives up their privacy to have less money than you can even survive on (meaning they need help from others), but those others who do help them out unreported can never marry them.

When you are married, you are seen as a strong unit, or a family, in society. When you are single, you are seen as alone, less stable, more transient.

In short, if you support the "blue" candidate, you perhaps are poor and want help from the government and are already willing to bend over in terms of privacy and the ability to have more strength in unity with another person (marriage) in exchange for barely enough funds to assist you in not perishing.

The person who votes "Red" sees this dynamic in action and hopes not to allow the government to continue to buy off many people in compromised situations for "blue" votes with measily amounts of money that gradually erode the rights of people which will lead to more and more rights gradually being taken away and a government that gradually gets more power over the population which leads to even more rights being taken away under coercion for "benefits".

This creates a continual fight between "left/blue" and "right/red". The two sides will never join together and see who is behind the curtain operating both red and blue candidates (controlled opposition) and therefore never put a true candidate up to bring the population together.

It is possible to simply award a reasonable amount of money, not a measily amount of money, to a disabled person without restricting their bank account, invading their privacy or coercing them not to get married. These rules do not need to be in place and are humiliating to the disabled and degrading to them creating a stigma against those with disabilities. A true candidate would allow for the ability to help those who are disabled and not invade the privacy of those individuals nor deprive them of a reasonable stipend that would make them still dependent on others to supplement them for survival. If this were done, neither the left nor the right would need to take issue with one another.

That is just the surface level of the left/right paradigm. We can go into abortion and hit level 2 and it will get real ugly real fast...so I am going to skip this subject for now and come back to it later.

On another level, we have the two sides of the vaccine mandates.

On the one hand, you have the view of the mainstream media for the most part (unless you count fox, but that is still controlled opposition and not a true counterpoint to the rest of the controlled media, just meant to look oppositional "to a point and no further"). The mainstream media will contend that a virus is a deadly affair and that a shot is a protector of life. Neither is true. Both are entirely false. A virus is not a deadly affair and I will expand in a minute on this point. And a shot is in no way whatsoever a protector of life and I will expand on this as well.

A virus, first of all, is not something that the lay person can see in order to prove its existence directly. For all any of us know, there may be no such thing as an airborne natural "virus" passed through the air from person to person that originated in some other animal somehow and just happened to get passed to a human and spread around the globe from person to person and kill people in its wake. There is literally no proof that anything like this ever happened ever. There are stories in history books written by those who are responsible for lying to us on every level and media propaganda and educational institutions designed to brainwash us that will say this is how it is, but none of us have any true evidence that it isn't simply a made up superstition and that we aren't all living in a giant cult we were born into. We simply wouldn't know the difference if we were because we have no frame of reference and normal is whatever you are born into even if it is all lies from birth to grave. Secondly, you don't know what killed anyone when someone is in a hospital or dies from a fever or something. You don't know what in the hospital might have been injected to kill them and you don't know what is causing the fever either. You can't see it and analyze it with your own eyes and hearing from an authority doesn't mean they aren't lying to you. Authority means nothing but somebody has the microphone because those controlling who gets access to the microphone want that person to say what they want to everybody and anybody else will be cancelled. That doesn't equal truth. That equals whoever is in power gets to be heard and whoever isn't in power doesn't get to be heard. That is ALL it means.

Okay, so now you have a lot of people scared to death of a virus and death, both of which could be complete bullshit, but it doesn't matter if it is bullshit because if they are scared out of their mind, the powers that be have achieved their objective. They now have one class of people -- let's call them group A, who are completely convinced of one reality and that reality scares the living shit out of them and they will do what they are told to alleviate that fear. So you have control established with fear.

Now, take group B (that would be most of us, by the way). We believe that group A is brainwashed and those brainwashing them are going to depopulate the planet, take away everyone's rights and we are going to have to get completely not reliant on the grid for survival and take an attitude that the stupid will die if we don't want to stand up to this tyranny on their behalf so that we can hide out and wait and see if they die before we lock and load and decide to remove the powers that be from power because we don't want to strike pre-emptively against a power that seems so everywhere all at once and able to turn the population against us -- our safest move is to prepare and steer clear. So, they have, by design, created fear in us and an inability to rise up and take them out of power, because we believe they are so powerful by their ability to turn the group A against us, we are too fearful to act in any really meaningful way. Hence, they control both group A by fear to comply with all mandates and group B by fear of both group A and also those who brainwashed group A to the point where we may not comply with directives, but we will not launch an assault against the tyrants who are turning group A into a threat to us because we figure group A may die if we just wait and then they won't be a threat anymore.

As such, the powers that be have neutralized both group A and group B from taking them out of power at the same time as they are continually decreasing our rights and increasing their power.

They are geniuses at controlled opposition, ruling through fear and ensuring they are never challenged for power.

Next point:

If they are never challenged for power, they will inevitably always hold on to power.

Do you want someone who continually takes away your rights and is smart enough to stop you from taking them out of power to remain in power forever?

No, you do not want that.

So, why don't you act?

See above. They have controlled our actions.

We are re-acting to their actions instead of acting of our own accord. Why? Because we are reacting out of fear instead of acting out of love.

Love, you say, whatever do you mean?

I mean, you love your rights as dearly as you love your own life. You would never allow someone to enslave you and those are by definition "your rights".

There are only two enemies in this world of ours.

One is death. A person can deprive you of life if they kill you.

The next is enslavement. A person can deprive you of liberty if they enslave you. Any act that forces you to do something against your will is enslavement by definition and an assault on your liberty.

In this nation, we have a saying written in hemp and it says that we value 3 things which can not be taken away by man as each person is born with these 3 things :

LIFE

LIBERTY

PURSUIT of HAPPINESS

They are killing people with shots.

LIFE

They are taking away people's rights and choice to not take the shot.

LIBERTY

They are tricking people with fear so that we will not fight for our life and liberty.

PURSUIT of HAPPINESS

Our happiness is predicated on our self esteem, that we will act of our own conscience to protect our own life and liberty. That, by definition is what creates a feeling of value in one self and therefore a feeling of happiness for pursuing it. By making us not act in our own favor, we are acting against the pursuit of our own happiness.

These are the tenants that our very freedom lies upon and so it was penned into the very fabric of our constitution so that these inalienable rights would be remembered, defended and protected for time immemorial.]

I suggest you all arm the fuck up with weapons and ammo and make a pact with all the rest of us right here and right now that we all have a duty and an obligation to protect not just our own rights, but since just one person can not do this by himself or herself, we must make a pact with one another, right here and right now to protect each other from tyranny.

When men go to war and I have consulted with those that have, you will get the same answer to this question.

I have asked, "What was it like the first time you had to kill a man in war?"

And this is the answer I got.

Anyone who likes war is crazy. Nobody likes war. War is hell. The first life you take is hard. After that, you are just trying to save the life of the guy next to you and you really can't even see who the hell you are shooting; you are just busy trying to stop anyone from shooting your buddy and he is trying to stop anyone from shooting you.

That is exactly how wars are won.

You don't win a war by yourself. The honor that comes from serving is the sacrifice you make that you are there defending the honor and liberty and life of every other person by putting yourself in harm's way. You may give up your life in that pursuit, but your job isn't to do that. Your job is to make the enemy give up their life so that those you are protecting stay safe.

It is not against the law to stand up for your neighbor. That is called honor. You can't shut down a website for saying that. If you could, then there wouldn't be one website up on the internet with a copy of the constitution, because all I am doing is telling you what is in that constitution. I am telling you the birth story of this nation.

In the hopes that there is never a death story of this nation, I bring to light the birth story of this nation and hope that we will be willing to stand up together (we can't do this alone) and join forces with all our brothers and sisters here and everywhere else who fight for liberty and remove tyranny wherever it may rear its ugly head, from this country and any other where it may threaten to overtake us again. That is our prime directive; to protect life at all costs, life and liberty.

I am armed up and ready to protect and defend the constitution. If you are able, I encourage you to do the same.

The more of us do it and aren't afraid to say it, the sooner we may have the strength in numbers to put this demon, this "powers that be" to rest 6 feet under where its destiny must lie if we are to continue to be free and leave this world free for the next generation that comes after we are gone.