BREAKING: Graphene Oxide confirmed by Raman Spectroscopy in samples of big pharma Covid-vaccines (UPDATED OP with English Only Versions pdf)

Not a soul will care except those of us who dont have the clotshot.

Those who poo poo the idea of graphene oxide in these inoculations is forgetting that no one knows what's in these inoculations. We're not given any kind of insert sheet description with these so-called vaccines as is the case with other medications.

There are lots of adverse reactions and many deaths associated with them. Are there several different formulations? Who can say? It seems likely to me that there are multiple versions of these inoculations and they are testing on the populace.

I wonder if anyone can help me with this:
I am definitely anti-vax on this issue and have been following major doctors who say this is a death jab or bad health jab for people.

But now they come out and say that the most deaths were probably caused by only 5% of the lots and only went to certain places and they seem to validate this.

What does that say about everyone else? Are these shots bad across the board or were only 5% of the lots the problem.

Yes, I know that probably 30% were saline---but that makes a total of 35% accounted for--what's happening with the 65% left?
Ideas anyone????

Yes if you look up research they figured out how to stop graphene oxide from being toxic by coating it perhaps with the lipid nanos they were able to make a superior adjuvant and delivery system

"However, GO aggregates in biological liquid and induces cell death, and it also exhibits poor biosolubility and biocompatibility. To address these limitations, various surface modification protocols have been employed to integrate aqueous compatible substances with GO to effectively improve its biocompatibility. More importantly, these modifications render functionalized-GO with superior properties as both carriers and adjuvants."

I wonder if anyone can help me with this:
I am definitely anti-vax on this issue and have been following major doctors who say this is a death jab or bad health jab for people.

But now they come out and say that the most deaths were probably caused by only 5% of the lots and only went to certain places and they seem to validate this.

What does that say about everyone else? Are these shots bad across the board or were only 5% of the lots the problem.

Yes, I know that probably 30% were saline---but that makes a total of 35% accounted for--what's happening with the 65% left?
Ideas anyone????

Seeing the presentation from Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid live, he published the report on his ResearchGate page.

[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

Use Google Translate for reading it in English.

This is huge. If this doesn’t force stopping the vaccination, nothing will. It’s up to us to ram this up the nose of every pro vaxxer and mainstream media outlet.

Edit 1: sorry for the hit and run posting of the thread, wanted to get it out ASAP. For those fixating in the toxicity, which can be debated for ever (as has been debated for ever with Mercury in vaccines), that’s not the point, but the breach of informed consent due to an UNLISTED INGREDIENT OF UNKNOWN LONG TERM EFFECTS, and this alone should be enough to halt all vaccination in all the world right now. This has profound legal and regulatory implications.

Edit 2:

People of GLP, the translation of this information to English and many other languages is already in process.

Many responders to this thread have pointed out that no one will do anything about this information, meaning that no authority will react upon it. I think this may well be the case, but only if we citizens do nothing. We have been given an information that we need to make into a tool for defending our rights and the lives of our loved ones. Only if we do nothing things are going to remain the same. Now we have a tool, let’s use it.

I had already asked for independent analysis of the clot shot vials in my country, officially, to the government agency in charge of pharmaceutical vigilance. They officially answered to me they weren’t doing any because the vials came certified from origin and they just checked the certificates and the chain of refrigeration data. This alone is a monstrous thing to admit, you are letting your population to be injected without even bothering to check what comes inside the vials. But they defend themselves saying that the international certification is warranty of safety and they can’t question that (I know, un fucking believable from a regulatory agency). Now I will take this report and ram it up their noses officially, there will be hell to pay for their criminal negligence. I fully encourage each and every one of you to do the same. No one else will do anything to stop this madness, it is up to Us, and we have been provided with a blunt and heavy tool for doing so.

Edit 3:

As there are already some smart asses trying to decry the toxicity of GO (as if it being unlisted as ingredient were not extremely illegal already), I am pasting here another comment I made about this:

There is already a proposal for a mechanism that could explain the observation of magnetism in vaxxed people that includes Graphene Oxide as the potential cause:

[link to www.notonthebeeb.co.uk (secure)]

Snip (less than 50%)

What does this mean for living cells?
The answer is that the transmembrane voltage gradient of living cells is of the order of ten million volts per metre (100 mV across a 10 nm membrane).

This means that a transmembrane strand of graphene or graphene oxide (from the vaccine) could carry a huge electric current and be likely to magnetise any superparamagnetic materials such as ferritin or magnetite that may be close by.

This effect could spread like wildfire across the membrane as each magnetized particle magnetizes its neighbours and then to those of the next cell, so that the magnetic effect increases and

Ultimately, it could spread to all parts of the body via the bloodstream, starting with the blood cells themselves, including those white cells needed for our immune system, then the veins, then the heart, followed by the lungs and finally the brain.

Wherever It goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue.

UPDATE: Study has been added in English at the end of this chapter of a wider compilation.

Update: this folder contains the Graphene oxide paper in three languages, added at the end of it:

[link to drive.google.com (secure)]

So does the article being in a different language prove it's not part of an online marketing campaign to trick you all?

Lots of nasty metals for the nanobots to begin construction with. Build back better internally.

Great catch OP, thank you. I will read it all.

Bump

Surely the graphene is there so they can detect if you had the shot or not.

It's a dog tag.

I bet next year they will come out with a wand device to detect the graphene in your arm.

The Toxicology of Graphene Oxide - which comes in different sizes and shapes that affect toxicology- is not well understood. It may be fair to say "it probably isn't good" but given the studies I have seen - there are doses that would likely not have drastic -or even noticeable effects. Just like pretty much every toxin on the planet.
If you want people to believe its so toxic that any dose is life-altering or life threatening you would have to bring the proof - if for no other reason that there are very, very few substances that are going to have a dramatic effect in any dosage.

OP s main point was it's an unlisted ingredient .
Did you even read OPs post ?

I came to the following realization awhile ago:

It's a Ferro fluid

-do you understand how these work ?

There are many applications of this . Too many papers to list.
But one of the basic ways it's dangerous :

[link to www.unboundmedicine.com (secure)]


It's is also lattice for clotting
[link to pubs.rsc.org (secure)]

Toxicity aside ..no ty I will pass( not too mention the clot shot isn't effective , lining up for quarterly shots, for the rest of my life is idîotic )
Not only can it do damage the way OP described, but these other ways as well
You want to talk bullshit, I am suspicious of thIs treatment , convince me it's effective , or a reasonable risk reward ratio .
Your response was based on the axiom that the burden of proof vs effegacy is on the challengers . I'm sorry has this shot passed normal testing protocols? How can you begin to argue from that priori?
Have you paid attention to the data coming out over the last few months ?
More than enough data exists , as well as common sense , to suspect this strategy .
Yeah ...u can't eradicate ths virus with this shot.
Maybe natural attenuation is a better long term strategy ?.
What's next mammalian mandates ?
Ok everyone ..time to vax every animal in the world that can carry this thing again, it's been three months.
GL with that