That thread was obviously posted by someone trying to establish preemptively that when Graphene oxide was confirmed, it wasn’t anything to be concerned about. This is absolutely debatable, and as I have already stated, by comparison with the already admitted use of mercury in jabs, because of the amount on each dose, it’s said to be safe.

And we could be debating about the toxicity of Graphene oxide till hell freezes as there’s a push for making it’s use widespread. Again, as a pint of comparison, No one disagrees that Mercury is toxic, but in small amounts and localized use, is officially considered as “enough safe” and people that strongly disagree, even with evidence in hand, is broadly dismissed. We can be sure the same will happen with GO (and is already happening, because there’s an ongoing push for Graphene oxide to be used and deployed widespread). And this is why it’s completely important to focus on the breach of informed consent and the seriousness of a violation of the obligation to report all ingredients exhaustively. This is where this whole scam can be torn apart.