The ancient Tartaria Tablets - the origin of writing

To watch later

Thanks!

bump

for later

Thx for adding

I'll add tomorrow other videos with English subtitles on subject if I find good ones.


But bottom line is all other scripts including proto cuneiform, ancient Hbrew, old Indus Valley script, ancient Spanish script, Nordic runes... All of them when you go back to their oldest form you'll see it s the same type of symbols just that a few thousands year later

An example of how other newer scripts are in fact derived from vinca script


[link to qph.fs.quoracdn.net (secure)]

Falling asleep. Can’t watch right now. But I agree with others. Bump for later!

Here you have Phoenician and vinca, identical again

https://twitter.com/_/status/985634042036080640

HA...Adam and Eve had knowledge of writing...from the beginning. That's how records were passed down, so the Moses, several thousand years later, could write Genesis. He, Moses, had the records saved on the Ark by Noah.

Ya therefore now you know where Garden of Eden was

Interesting.

This is from the Turdas-Vinca culture of the Middle Neolithic in Southeastern Europe.

There are some anthropomorphic figurines that have been discovered from these sites as well.

The script itself is generally believed to be a proto-Sumerian writing though that finding has been controversial and debated since the tablets were first discovered.

The tablets were baked at a museum which made carbon 14 dating them impossible however the other finds from Tartaria, such as the figurines, can be dated to a time prior to Sumerian cuneiform writing.

Thanks for sharing. I really enjoy this type of research. Writing this out, though redundant, should assist me to retain this information.

Check this as well. You can use Google to translate in English.
It s about a much older artefact dated around 26.000 bc

Which is the first known proof of matemathical thinking

3 + 6 = 9

[link to www.dacia.org]


Maybe you re familiar with Tesla and his 3 6 9 obsession

And of course Tesla was born in the same region from where all these come from :)

As for proto-Sumerian given vinca-turds predates everything else which have striking similarities with it

And geographically balkans are in the center relative to Spain and Scandinavia on one side and middle east all the way to India on the other side, it just expanded from center

Thanks for posting this again. I never find the time to watch.

They re not too long :) first one has like 10 mins

like I'd tell you if I did

don't ask why not either

Jon Levi
Mud floods
Great reset
Worlds Fairs
Destroying antiquitech

Thank me later

No need to tell. I already know. :)

some of the earliest modern humans found in europe is from the same area, and funny while they were cave nighbours, one of them has afinity with later ice age europeans, while the other has afinity with asians and native americans



""Oase 2" belongs to the same basal subclade of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup N as "Oase 1". When compared against all DNA samples on record, "Oase 2" and "Oase 1" share the closest genetic affinity with each other. "Oase 1" and "Oase 2" appear to be from related, but not necessarily identical populations.

"Oase" 1 shows an affinity for Ice Age Europeans that is not found in "Oase 2", while "Oase 2" is closer to Asians and Native Americans. "Oase 1" shows a genetic affinity for "Peştera Muierii 2" that is not found in "Oase 2". After "Oase 1", the next closest genetic affinity for "Oase 2" among ancient DNA samples is Tianyuan man. Neither "Oase 2" nor "Oase 1" are particularly close genetically to any modern human populations. "

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]