|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Uncle Doctor Intel - Doctor I know dropped a truth bomb about vax injuries, firsthand experience
|
|
Poster Handle
|
BarbaricYawpSounder |
|
Post Content
|
...
The entire POINT here, which you seem to miss, is the dangers were unknown because ONLY limited testing had been conducted in the rush to market. THAT is why people should have been wary...because in Feb, precisely zero significant data sets existed to prove ANYTHING in either direction. You are trying to state the opposite and your agenda in this conversation is sketchy.
Unless you provide links to the Feb. data you speak of, I will just ignore your future comments, which have been quite rude.
Quoting: BarbaricYawpSounder You certainly have a strange attitude. If you're so concerned with evidence, then you should start at the beginning which is how was the SARS CoV2 virus identified (isolated, purified, replicated and proven to cause the symptom set called "COVID 19"). The answer to that is it wasn't. There is no SARS CoV2 virus. COVID 19 is nothing but other illnesses being labeled COVID. It's a psyop. So, that said, why in the hell would anyone take a "vaccine" for something that doesn't exist? In no way does the post you addressed discount the possibility you stated. There is some evidence to suggest this is a possibility. Both things can be true simultaneously...ever consider that? Sorry but I'm not following. What "both things"? My point is that the entire discussion about whether to take the clotshot should really be moot if there no malady for which the clotshot was allegedly developed to prevent. This is very much a "19 Arabs with box cutters" type of problem, meaning that if the initial information is garbage, then all that proceeds from that initial info is also garbage. Yes, but ... if the end goal is a vax with political motives (insert your choicee of motive here), it makes sense that you'd need to have a "pandemic" first...correct? Not agreeing with your assessment of the virus being fake and/or mischaracterized influenza... not disagreeing, either... I suppose your idea is a possibility. But if your determination turns out to bevtrue, it does not discountvanything I have written here. Fake orcrwal, either way... are people dying from a vax that does not work? Yes, at least according to my personal gp. Did they rush an untested "vax" to market? Yes, at least as far as we know. Hope that better clarifies what I was trying to say.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
