Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,398 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 216,476
Pageviews Today: 384,470Threads Today: 194Posts Today: 2,809
04:30 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Comirnaty Package Insert Reveals All
Poster Handle Beware of the Dogma
Post Content
Direct from the Comirnaty package insert...

[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]

5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis
Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days
following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females
and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.
Although some cases
required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had
resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential longterm
sequelae. The CDC has published considerations related to myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination,
including for vaccination of individuals with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis
( [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

5.5 Limitation of Effectiveness
COMIRNATY may not protect all vaccine recipients.


13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of
male fertility. In a developmental toxicity study in rats with COMIRNATY there were no vaccine-related
effects on female fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].



Obviously they are well aware of myocarditis, pericarditis, otherwise they wouldn't have included it in the insert. They also admit that vaccine "may" not work. It is quite obvious that there have not been sufficient studies to rule out carcinogenicity, genotoxicity etc. They admit that they have no idea what it does to fertility in males. They admit that female fertility has only been briefly and incompletely studied in rats (no long term).

And all this is for the one that has actually been "approved". Of course there is much more in the insert that reveals the absolute lack of proper safety evaluation. But you can research the Pfizer EUA insert as well...

[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]


Bottom line. There is absolutely no justification for this being mandated. There really isn't any justification for administration at all, as there is nothing here that demonstrates that the risks outweigh the benefit, especially for a supposed illness, with an IFR of .15 or less for the majority of individuals. Never has the groundwork been better laid for a health disaster of unimaginable proportions. Every day this continues only demonstrates that there is truly no rule of law. But I guess most of you already knew that.
 Quoting: Beware of the Dogma


There is not a vaccine on the market that does not have section 13.1 in the insert disclosures.

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
[INSERT VACCINE HERE] has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of fertility.
 Quoting: Nitehawk


That isn't an a valid argument in mandating or coercing them, or a precedent they would want advertised. Past crimes don't provide blanket immunity for future crimes.

Many are aware of the problems around informed consent that have been occurring long before Covid. Just ask any parent with a child injured or killed by a vaccine. Utilizing ignorance and propaganda and owing to the fact that most childhood vaccines are far "safer" than these "genetic therapy" jabs, these career criminals have kept their deaths and injuries hidden before, but they just blew it wide open, when they went for broke in trying to inject everyone.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP