Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres | |
SativaSyborg
User ID: 80867894 United States 11/21/2021 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymuus Coward
User ID: 81054742 Canada 11/21/2021 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have lived in absolute poverty most of my life, picking up cans and bottles off the street for food for 17 years. And have been intermittently homeless or slept on friend's couches for years. Finally, I am wealthy and I own three houses and two other pieces of land... ...Whereupon, some cocksucker Leftist "who knows what's best for me" comes along and wants to take it all away again and put me back on the street with nothing but the offer of a cell provided by some college dropout guy who probably shagged a girl I loved long ago and who absolutely hates me. Anonymuus Coward |
Lady Jane Smith
Forum Administrator 11/21/2021 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Welcome to communism, cupcakes. Oh, and if the person in the next cube is a complete POS? Too bad. You live on your assigned postage stamp and cannot move. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
@MoonPie
User ID: 28698215 United States 11/21/2021 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Shallow men believe in luck or in circumstance. Strong men believe in cause and effect.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson “Three great forces rule the world: stupidity, fear and greed.” — Albert Einstein. "Truth does not mind being questioned. A lie does" — Janis Ian |
Icebear
User ID: 19590118 United States 11/21/2021 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expert: Limit living space to shrink building carbon footprint Quoting: QuantumEntaglement Energy efficient building renovation is not enough to lessen the climate impact of residential buildings, according to one sustainability expert who is calling for a limit on the living space allocated per person in residential homes. EURACTIV France reports. Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres for a single person and 40-80 square metres for a four-person household.... Are you actually RECOMMENDING/ADVOCATING this stupid shit?? 'If the wankers do not now come to their senses and clean up their stupid act, they may anticipate a rain of ruin from the sky, the like of which has never been seen on this Earth,,,' |
#ibrushedmyteethtoday
User ID: 9983835 United States 11/21/2021 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
16 Blocks
User ID: 81182625 Germany 11/21/2021 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Gypo O'Leary
User ID: 79261622 United States 11/21/2021 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this is the problems with experts.. they are just assholes that got some credentials. they are not geniuses. I've already realized the solution to this problem. We need to advance the concept of a space suit. We all realize that if the human species is to ever leave earth, we will need space suits...climate tek for our bodies. but, why do we not see, that we need this gear even here on earth. We keep trying to heat and cool giant spaces called buildings. We don't need to...we just need to wear space suits here on earth and simply directly climate control our own physical body. then the building can be heated above freezing for water, but no more than say..40 degrees. no A/C needed. Each individual will have a containment outfit. it heats/cools them. What we need to do... -advance the space suit concept into more a modern cat-suit or superhero style suit. -get rid of clothing. each person will get their enviro-suit and that is all they need. -this also will end viruses as everyone will be physically isolated from everyone else. Last Edited by Gypo O'Leary on 11/21/2021 12:52 PM A. Nonymous Coward |
fiora.ni
User ID: 78314149 United States 11/21/2021 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 14-20 sq meters - is it per person or per family? FYI in soviet union the norm was 9-11sq meters per person, depending on a city. If a family of two had a 20sq meters room in apartment, they would not be eligible to even join the queue for improving their living conditions. After having a child they might become eligible and the government would take the documents from them. After the documents are accepted, the waiting time would typically last for many years, because there always would be people who are more eligible that would be put in front of the line. Ah, as a cherry on top, building on your own or in groups were prohibited or made very difficult for the most part of the existence of the USSR. But, for some people, this new "living space recommendations" would actually mean improving their living conditions. Current state of affairs: "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." Russian warship, go f#ck yourself! Say with me: Palianytsia :) |
Overdue
User ID: 80335548 United States 11/21/2021 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I dont need a big house but I need some land! Cant live right next to someone. |
Proud Trump Supporter
User ID: 2473803 United States 11/21/2021 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This would be a great requirement for all government politicians while in office and a few years afterwards. The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill Daily Updates Thread: ASS IS IN THE WRINGER - Rolling Updates from 11/16/20 to present (Page 235) |
Proud Trump Supporter
User ID: 2473803 United States 11/21/2021 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW.. our cabin is 12x18 feet without the bathroom and kitchenette. It has a small loft. Perfect for one or two. The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill Daily Updates Thread: ASS IS IN THE WRINGER - Rolling Updates from 11/16/20 to present (Page 235) |
Ivanczar
User ID: 79021287 United States 11/21/2021 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
vEyeSea
User ID: 30003138 United States 11/21/2021 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expert: Limit living space to shrink building carbon footprint Quoting: QuantumEntaglement Energy efficient building renovation is not enough to lessen the climate impact of residential buildings, according to one sustainability expert who is calling for a limit on the living space allocated per person in residential homes. EURACTIV France reports. Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres for a single person and 40-80 square metres for a four-person household, according to Pia Mamut, a research fellow at the Chair of International Relations and Sustainable Development at Germany’s Münster University who intervened on behalf of her superior, Doris Fuchs. While such an idea may seem extreme, “the contextual, social, economic and cultural conditions are already being explored in both science and policy,” Mamut told a webinar organised by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) on Wednesday (29 April). Speaking at the event, Mamut proposed several solutions for low-carbon housing, including limiting the number of square metres per person. She warned however that such limits to housing size “cannot simply be imposed but require a democratic process and agreement”. The webinar follows the publication of an EEB report titled: “An action plan to deliver a healthy, affordable and sustainable built environment for all”. In its report, the EEB advocates the idea that, in order to reduce carbon emissions from the building sector, the focus should not only lie on energy renovation but also on our planet’s natural resources in order to create a more sustainable and ecological habitat. Energy-efficient buildings should be 'new normal', says EU’s Simson The European commissioner for energy. Next June, as part of the “Fit for 55” package, the European Commission will revise its energy taxation directive, with the aim of reversing the current logic whereby electricity, which is supposed to be greener, is more heavily taxed than fossil fuels like gas and oil. A public consultation is already available on the Commission’s website. Isn't that about the size of a prison cell? You'll own nothing and be happy. Except for the people at the top, they get even more stuff because they'll have more. Global warming is a scam. To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. When the government is wrong, it's dangerous to be right. The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. -Robspierre |
Judethz
User ID: 79555498 United Kingdom 11/21/2021 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jungleboogie
User ID: 18564362 Canada 11/21/2021 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expert: Limit living space to shrink building carbon footprint Quoting: QuantumEntaglement Energy efficient building renovation is not enough to lessen the climate impact of residential buildings, according to one sustainability expert who is calling for a limit on the living space allocated per person in residential homes. EURACTIV France reports. Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres for a single person and 40-80 square metres for a four-person household, according to Pia Mamut, a research fellow at the Chair of International Relations and Sustainable Development at Germany’s Münster University who intervened on behalf of her superior, Doris Fuchs. While such an idea may seem extreme, “the contextual, social, economic and cultural conditions are already being explored in both science and policy,” Mamut told a webinar organised by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) on Wednesday (29 April). Speaking at the event, Mamut proposed several solutions for low-carbon housing, including limiting the number of square metres per person. She warned however that such limits to housing size “cannot simply be imposed but require a democratic process and agreement”. The webinar follows the publication of an EEB report titled: “An action plan to deliver a healthy, affordable and sustainable built environment for all”. In its report, the EEB advocates the idea that, in order to reduce carbon emissions from the building sector, the focus should not only lie on energy renovation but also on our planet’s natural resources in order to create a more sustainable and ecological habitat. Energy-efficient buildings should be 'new normal', says EU’s Simson The European commissioner for energy. Next June, as part of the “Fit for 55” package, the European Commission will revise its energy taxation directive, with the aim of reversing the current logic whereby electricity, which is supposed to be greener, is more heavily taxed than fossil fuels like gas and oil. A public consultation is already available on the Commission’s website. Important bit of information showing another aspect of "The Great Reset". Basically relegating EVERYONE below the upper half of middle class into serfs and prisoners. 80% of the population is below upper middle class. Yikes. And if you live in the sticks, you'd better have your own power supply. Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
loofa
User ID: 81067894 United States 11/21/2021 12:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jungleboogie
User ID: 18564362 Canada 11/21/2021 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eireann
User ID: 79722836 Ireland 11/21/2021 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 14-20 sq meters - is it per person or per family? FYI in soviet union the norm was 9-11sq meters per person, depending on a city. If a family of two had a 20sq meters room in apartment, they would not be eligible to even join the queue for improving their living conditions. After having a child they might become eligible and the government would take the documents from them. Quoting: fiora.ni After the documents are accepted, the waiting time would typically last for many years, because there always would be people who are more eligible that would be put in front of the line. Ah, as a cherry on top, building on your own or in groups were prohibited or made very difficult for the most part of the existence of the USSR. But, for some people, this new "living space recommendations" would actually mean improving their living conditions. They started with an allotment of 8 oz of chocolate, but then the Party decided it could only afford 4 oz of chocolate. Waited several months and raised it to 6 oz of chocolate and everyone praised the Party for the increase in chocolate. (from 1984) They can keep their allotted living space requirements and stay the hell out of my carbon footprint! Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Tendrath
User ID: 78443342 United States 11/21/2021 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80710591 United States 11/21/2021 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
fiora.ni
User ID: 78314149 United States 11/21/2021 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 14-20 sq meters - is it per person or per family? FYI in soviet union the norm was 9-11sq meters per person, depending on a city. If a family of two had a 20sq meters room in apartment, they would not be eligible to even join the queue for improving their living conditions. After having a child they might become eligible and the government would take the documents from them. Quoting: fiora.ni After the documents are accepted, the waiting time would typically last for many years, because there always would be people who are more eligible that would be put in front of the line. Ah, as a cherry on top, building on your own or in groups were prohibited or made very difficult for the most part of the existence of the USSR. But, for some people, this new "living space recommendations" would actually mean improving their living conditions. They started with an allotment of 8 oz of chocolate, but then the Party decided it could only afford 4 oz of chocolate. Waited several months and raised it to 6 oz of chocolate and everyone praised the Party for the increase in chocolate. (from 1984) They can keep their allotted living space requirements and stay the hell out of my carbon footprint! Oh, I'm with you. At some point of time we had 8 people(2 families with one ore on the way) living in the same apartment of 42sq mt(452sq feet). Had constant fights and were not eligible for any improvements. F#ck those who wants to even think of imposing this on people. Current state of affairs: "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." Russian warship, go f#ck yourself! Say with me: Palianytsia :) |
Pilgrim001
User ID: 78018011 United States 11/21/2021 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expert: Limit living space to shrink building carbon footprint Quoting: QuantumEntaglement Energy efficient building renovation is not enough to lessen the climate impact of residential buildings, according to one sustainability expert who is calling for a limit on the living space allocated per person in residential homes. EURACTIV France reports. Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres for a single person and 40-80 square metres for a four-person household, according to Pia Mamut, a research fellow at the Chair of International Relations and Sustainable Development at Germany’s Münster University who intervened on behalf of her superior, Doris Fuchs. While such an idea may seem extreme, “the contextual, social, economic and cultural conditions are already being explored in both science and policy,” Mamut told a webinar organised by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) on Wednesday (29 April). Speaking at the event, Mamut proposed several solutions for low-carbon housing, including limiting the number of square metres per person. She warned however that such limits to housing size “cannot simply be imposed but require a democratic process and agreement”. The webinar follows the publication of an EEB report titled: “An action plan to deliver a healthy, affordable and sustainable built environment for all”. In its report, the EEB advocates the idea that, in order to reduce carbon emissions from the building sector, the focus should not only lie on energy renovation but also on our planet’s natural resources in order to create a more sustainable and ecological habitat. Energy-efficient buildings should be 'new normal', says EU’s Simson The European commissioner for energy. Next June, as part of the “Fit for 55” package, the European Commission will revise its energy taxation directive, with the aim of reversing the current logic whereby electricity, which is supposed to be greener, is more heavily taxed than fossil fuels like gas and oil. A public consultation is already available on the Commission’s website. It's really none of your fucking business. It is for each person to decide for themselves. Only idiots worry about "carbon footprints". Communism is for LOSERS Communism is SLAVERY Fuck Joe Biden |
SativaSyborg
User ID: 80867894 United States 11/21/2021 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why do you even ask these kind of questions? you know that's the whole problem with communists... they have that particular, gullible ness about them. ............makes them fall for communism every time.. you PROMISE? this time? you'll follow the rules and live just like us? ..............they ask this to the rich people in charge of their situation right now... (they think someone in this position would EVER let go of what they have) no... if you have it. you do EVERYTHING you can to NOT LET IT GET AWAY. ............you ESPECIALLY LIE TO THE PEOPLE BENEATH YOU TO TRICK THEM INTO SOME SORT OF CONFINED SITUATION THAT WILL KEEP THEM FROM COME AND TAKING IT FROM YOU..........this is what communism is born of. it's also what Capatilism is built of. SativaSyborg |
SativaSyborg
User ID: 80867894 United States 11/21/2021 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 12 acres, 12 rental units, 2br bth we employ around 50 employees, we have so far, employees in 4 of our rentals.. our rent is cheap, 200 cheaper than what you'd pay even down the road for the same rental house style. right now, we've had no problem with these employees paying rent.. after all, we pay their paychecks. and get it right back. because for our little situation, the economy is strong.. SativaSyborg |
Ben Band
User ID: 80957975 United States 11/21/2021 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 sq meters is 215 sq ft. For two people you would hopefully get double 430 sq ft. To give you an idea: The typical FEMA trailer accommodates two adults and two children. It measures 14' by 22' (308 sq ft)  or 8' by 32' (256 sq ft).  It consists of a master bedroom with a standard size bed, a living area with kitchen and stove, bunk beds, and a bathroom with shower. A shipping container is 8' X 40' which is 320 sq ft. Perfect for you and your loved one. it is why the tiny home has become so popular Last Edited by Ben Band on 11/21/2021 01:21 PM |
akaSuzanne
User ID: 78185358 United States 11/21/2021 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expert: Limit living space to shrink building carbon footprint Quoting: QuantumEntaglement Energy efficient building renovation is not enough to lessen the climate impact of residential buildings, according to one sustainability expert who is calling for a limit on the living space allocated per person in residential homes. EURACTIV France reports. Individuals should be allocated living space of between 14-20 square metres for a single person and 40-80 square metres for a four-person household, according to Pia Mamut, a research fellow at the Chair of International Relations and Sustainable Development at Germany’s Münster University who intervened on behalf of her superior, Doris Fuchs. While such an idea may seem extreme, “the contextual, social, economic and cultural conditions are already being explored in both science and policy,” Mamut told a webinar organised by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) on Wednesday (29 April). Speaking at the event, Mamut proposed several solutions for low-carbon housing, including limiting the number of square metres per person. She warned however that such limits to housing size “cannot simply be imposed but require a democratic process and agreement”. The webinar follows the publication of an EEB report titled: “An action plan to deliver a healthy, affordable and sustainable built environment for all”. In its report, the EEB advocates the idea that, in order to reduce carbon emissions from the building sector, the focus should not only lie on energy renovation but also on our planet’s natural resources in order to create a more sustainable and ecological habitat. Energy-efficient buildings should be 'new normal', says EU’s Simson The European commissioner for energy. Next June, as part of the “Fit for 55” package, the European Commission will revise its energy taxation directive, with the aim of reversing the current logic whereby electricity, which is supposed to be greener, is more heavily taxed than fossil fuels like gas and oil. A public consultation is already available on the Commission’s website. We know all about agenda21 and agenda2030. The end game is not pleasant and the true purpose is not about going green, it is about control. |
FeralOne
User ID: 81184118 United States 11/21/2021 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
FeralOne
User ID: 81184118 United States 11/21/2021 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 sq meters is 215 sq ft. For two people you would hopefully get double 430 sq ft. Quoting: Ben Band To give you an idea: The typical FEMA trailer accommodates two adults and two children. It measures 14' by 22' (308 sq ft)  or 8' by 32' (256 sq ft).  It consists of a master bedroom with a standard size bed, a living area with kitchen and stove, bunk beds, and a bathroom with shower. A shipping container is 8' X 40' which is 320 sq ft. Perfect for you and your loved one. it is why the tiny home has become so popular A shipping container "home" is adequate for normal living functions - sleeping, eating, studying, fucking, etc. It's perfectly OK as long as there's an attached 5000 square foot workshop/garage area and enough land for desired outdoor activities and distancing from neighbors. |
#ibrushedmyteethtoday
User ID: 9983835 United States 11/21/2021 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |