One juror shook his head to the lawyer for the guy with a camera's closing statements. When this lawyer pointed it out (how we knew) he suggested the jury needed to take a break. Then I believe the juror can be heard yelling out that was not the case, and the lawyer immediately knew what it meant: his message was not getting through to this juror. It looks like that guy hired the cheapest lawyer he could afford, and it looks like at least 1 guy on the jury is going to be steadfast in convicting the guy with the camera.

So I don't think it's going to be an acquittal of him at least.