Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,928 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 483,941
Pageviews Today: 768,323Threads Today: 316Posts Today: 4,746
08:22 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80250966
United States
12/03/2021 11:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Ivermectin does not reduce risk of severe illness from COVID-19

The Institute for Clinical Research (ICR) NIH today announced findings for the Ivermectin study (I-TECH) in 500 hospitalised patients with Stage 2 or 3 COVID-19. This multi-centre open-label randomised controlled trial evaluated a 5-day course of ivermectin (0.4mg/kg/day) plus standard of care (IVM group), compared to standard of care (SOC group) according to Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) guidelines for COVID-19 patients at 20 government hospitals and MAEPS 2.0 Quarantine and COVID-19 Treatment Centre (PKRC).

The trial was conducted by infectious disease physicians and clinicians who were actively involved in COVID-19 management in collaboration with the Institute for Clinical Research (ICR), National Institute of Health (NIH). The main outcome of the I-TECH study was to see if ivermectin administered during the first week of illness prevented deterioration to severe COVID-19 Stage 4 or 5 among hospitalised patients aged 50 years and above with at least one comorbidity.

ICR Director, Dr Kalaiarasu M. Peariasamy, said the I-TECH findings showed that patients in the IVM group compared to SOC group had similar rates of progression to severe COVID-19 disease at 21.2 percent and 17.3 percent respectively (OR 1.29 [95% CI 0.82-2.02]; p = 0.30). For the same primary outcome, the mean time to progression was 3.0 days for the IVM group compared to 2.9 days for the SOC group, but the difference was not statistically significant; p=0.68.

According to the Principal Investigator of the I-TECH study, Dr. Steven Lim Chee Loon, Infectious Disease Specialist at Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, there were no significant differences found in terms of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, symptom recovery, blood parameters and chest x-ray resolution in both groups. The odds of complete symptom recovery by Day 5 of enrolment between IVM and SOC groups were very similar and not statistically significant; p=0.77.



[link to outbreaknewstoday.com]

Last Edited by Fraust66 on 12/04/2021 01:22 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81140137
United States
12/03/2021 11:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

Who believes the gubbermint at this point?
Carbonous

User ID: 78803786
United States
12/03/2021 11:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Lim Chee Loon? Lol...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

Who believes the gubbermint at this point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81140137


The randomized clinical trial was not conducted by " the gubbermint" and it was peer reviewed by independent experts.
Sir Vaccinesalot

User ID: 81126091
12/03/2021 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
then why was the CDC and Who passing it out all over India?
Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance!

Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80992307
United States
12/03/2021 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Read the 2nd comment at the link.

That study is shit, caca, bunk.

P of 0.3. Lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81140137
United States
12/03/2021 11:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

Who believes the gubbermint at this point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81140137


The randomized clinical trial was not conducted by " the gubbermint" and it was peer reviewed by independent experts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77435054


bsflag

Lol, experts huh?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81019890
United States
12/03/2021 11:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
lol
fucking lying morons

ivermectin is not supposed to "reduce the risk of severe illness from covid"
vitamin d3 does that

IVERMECTIN JUST KILLS THE VIRUS.
Sir Vaccinesalot

User ID: 81126091
12/03/2021 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Read the 2nd comment at the link.

That study is shit, caca, bunk.

P of 0.3. Lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80992307


thanks, thoroughly debunked
Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance!

Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes."
Albion Moonlight

User ID: 81416637
United States
12/03/2021 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Doubtlessly a mistake to give it to an intubated man who then leaves the Hospital cured.
Albion Moonlight
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2527777
United States
12/03/2021 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

Who believes the gubbermint at this point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81140137


The randomized clinical trial was not conducted by " the gubbermint" and it was peer reviewed by independent experts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77435054


NATIONAL Institute for Health.


No $3.50 for you.
Sir Vaccinesalot

User ID: 81126091
12/03/2021 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
OP is a chinese troll
Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance!

Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76625601
12/03/2021 11:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Notice the words chelated zinc were never included nor were the words zinc ionophore even considered as part of this b8g pharma shill study

bsflag
Updated
User ID: 76625601
12/03/2021 11:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Notice the words chelated zinc were never included nor were the words zinc ionophore even considered as part of this big pharma shill study

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76625601


vendetta
d1k

User ID: 71070744
Canada
12/03/2021 11:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
LOL

"Howard
NOVEMBER 8, 2021 AT 11:53 AM
A study is useless if the p value is greater than 0.01

When p=0.30 it means there is a 30% chance that the results were just random luck.

Basic university statistics course."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
OP is a chinese troll
 Quoting: Sir Vaccinesalot


Oh, well THAT proves it!.

laugh
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Notice the words chelated zinc were never included nor were the words zinc ionophore even considered as part of this b8g pharma shill study

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76625601


You're thinking of hydroxychoroquine. Zinc was the magic fairy dust that made that effective.
It’s Too Late

User ID: 78813817
United States
12/03/2021 11:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
How can you “reduce the risk of severe illness” when the test subject has already been hospitalized by covid?????

Aren’t the results predetermined by the control?
Previously I’m with Trump.
I will not comply
Molon Labe
".....Shall not be infringed."
I'm pro guns.
I'm pro life.
I'm saved by the blood of Jesus Christ.
Respect veterans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68186499
Canada
12/03/2021 11:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Y'all demand they take you seriously and investigate the use of the stuff, then when they do y'all refuse to accept their findings.

Brilliant.

Fanatics are odd.

jihad
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81019890
United States
12/03/2021 11:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Notice the words chelated zinc were never included nor were the words zinc ionophore even considered as part of this b8g pharma shill study

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76625601


You're thinking of hydroxychoroquine. Zinc was the magic fairy dust that made that effective.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77435054


hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and quercetin
all 3 have the same effect
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81019890
United States
12/03/2021 11:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Y'all demand they take you seriously and investigate the use of the stuff, then when they do y'all refuse to accept their findings.

Brilliant.

Fanatics are odd.

jihad
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68186499


retard3d kanak
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78704550
United States
12/03/2021 11:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

bsflag

bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Still waiting for a peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with hundred of patients showing that Ivermectin is effective in reducing the risk of severe illness from COVID-19.
Carbonous

User ID: 78803786
United States
12/03/2021 11:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
I got a bunch of 6mg Ivermectin and 200's of HCQ in the mail today...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

bsflag

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78704550


Yes, that was a very compelling argument against the validity of this RCT.

I'm convinced.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68186499
Canada
12/03/2021 11:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Y'all demand they take you seriously and investigate the use of the stuff, then when they do y'all refuse to accept their findings.

Brilliant.

Fanatics are odd.

jihad
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68186499


retard3d kanak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81019890


I'd rather be a tard and have my own Mind, than be some npc doofus following fakenews propaganda.

Yea, good luck with that, buddy! At least I am happy.

hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77398348
United States
12/03/2021 11:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
There were 13 deaths - 3 for ivermectin and 10 for control. This is a huge reduction that you failed to mention. IVM is more effective for early treatment. Once the patient is already in hospital, it is not very effective to prevent the progression.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77435054
United States
12/03/2021 11:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
How can you “reduce the risk of severe illness” when the test subject has already been hospitalized by covid?????

Aren’t the results predetermined by the control?
 Quoting: It’s Too Late


That's not how the RCT was conducted. Read the paper.

Ivermectin (or placebo) was given to patients early, in the first week of illness.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68186499
Canada
12/03/2021 11:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Fanatics.

1dunno1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76625601
12/03/2021 11:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
Notice the words chelated zinc were never included nor were the words zinc ionophore even considered as part of this big pharma shill study

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76625601


You're thinking of hydroxychoroquine. Zinc was the magic fairy dust that made that effective.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77435054


hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and quercetin
all 3 have the same effect
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81019890


Exactly hence the part about "ZINC IONOPHORES"

bert-facepalm
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76625601
12/03/2021 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New peer reviewed randomised clinical trial with 500 patients: Ivermectin does not reduce the risk of severe illness from COVID-19
bsflag

bsflag

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78704550


Yes, that was a very compelling argument against the validity of this RCT.

I'm convinced.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77435054


I guarantee youre vaxxinated

retards2





GLP