Open letter on the campaign by the City of Vienna "Allocation of vaccination appointments"

A magnificent open letter from an unvaccinated Austria citizen to vaccination program project office, which is sending letters to unvaccinated people informing a certain Covid vaccination date reserved to them.

So this guy, Gerald Styl wrote an epic open letter, sent to them and shared publicly.

The letter is in German so i post here excerpts from g-translation. The links for g-translate and the original letter is at the bottom.
_____________________________________________________

I belong to that unvaccinated part of the Viennese population who received an invitation to a vaccination appointment in a vaccination street in the last few days. Since this letter is full of untruths and rejections, I have decided to publicly formulate my anger and displeasure about it and contact the project manager Covid-19 of the City of Vienna, Ms. Dr. Ursula Karnthaler to deposit.

------

Doctor Ursula Karnthaler!

First of all, I would like to thank you very much for your touching concern for my health, which now clearly culminates in the fact that you have made an appointment for me for medical treatment with a doctor I trust in a vaccination street. In such facilities - as I hear - the clarification talk and anamnesis are particularly conscientious.

However, since your letter is full of legal, medical and moral reprehensibility, I feel compelled to respond to it personally and not simply dispose of it unread in the nearest paper container (you know, waste separation is important!).

At the outset, I can assure you that I see myself in a position to arrange and attend health appointments myself if necessary. Fortunately, I do not (yet) need the caring support of the City of Vienna or any other institution for such a project. In this respect, I can only describe your letter as personal harassment.

...

Since you strongly recommend a COVID vaccination in your letter, there is probably also a violation of Section 6 of the Arzeimittelgesetz, which prohibits unauthorized advertising of medicinal products.

Furthermore, I can ask you whether I can contact you personally in the event of a vaccine damage and whether I can hold you liable for all damage and disadvantages I suffer. This question will have to be clarified from a legal point of view, since you are personally drawing this letter.

----

Regarding the content and the reasoning of your letter, with regard to the dangerousness of this virus, I would like to remind you that international studies, such as those by the well-known scientist John PA Ioannidis from Stanford University and many others, show an infection fatality rate of Cover COVID globally with 0.15%. (1) The risk of ending up in an intensive care unit and dying is therefore extremely low for a healthy person without obesity, diabetes or other previous illnesses - thank goodness -. In view of the high number of dangerous side effects of this gene therapy, which can no longer be denied - a vaccination per se creates sterile immunity by definition, which is not the case here - this “vaccination” can only be discouraged.The harm far outweighs the benefit, even in the elderly, such as the work of Kostoff, RN et al. (2021) makes it very clear. (2) I will come to the side effects of the vaccination, which are outright concealed in your letter, a little later.

Regarding your so-called solidarity argument, which is used again and again without any meaning from different sides, I would like to invite you to an interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci of the Center of Disease Control (CDC), who did not appear to be an anti-vaccination agent, as you will probably know. He states that vaccinated people spread the virus in the same way as unvaccinated people.

...

How to use all psychological tricks (vaccination lotteries, price competitions, free meals) to blunt pressure (discrimination, exclusion from public life, work ban through the 2G rule, etc.) to get the population to accept a drug that does not even have a final approval by the authorities can actually only be explained by criminal energy. As a COVID-19 project manager, you should know that the substances from MODERNA are scheduled for approval in 2022, BioNTech in 2023 and ASTRA ZENECA in 2024. All of these substances have only a conditional approval in Europe and an emergency approval in the United States.

...

You don't need to be a great expert on the subject of the protective effect to justifiably cast doubt on it. If the population was initially persuaded to be fully immunized and protected after two partial vaccinations, the booster vaccinations are now urgently recommended, and even mandatory, if you do not want to lose your vaccination status. In other countries with a high vaccination rate (such as Israel) the fourth partial vaccinations are due. This alone shows the very limited effectiveness of these substances.

...

The increasing number of vaccination breakthroughs in Austria was also confirmed by AGES in November of this year. In weeks 41 - 44, 13,363 symptomatic cases were counted, 9,297 of them with breakthrough vaccination, that is 69.57% !! (8th)

...

So if you speak of a safe vaccination in your letter to the unvaccinated Viennese population, this can only be described as a cynical untruth and comes very close to the criminal act of §146ff STGB:

"Anyone who intends to unlawfully enrich himself or a third party by deceiving someone by deceiving facts about an act, toleration or omission ... is to be punished."

The pharmaceutical industry lobby will certainly be grateful for your letter. In any case, I and many other Viennese are not.

Gerald Styll (end of the letter)
_______________________________________________________

I took only some parts of the letter (50% rule). There is more in the links below.
translation link:
[link to tkp-at.translate.goog (secure)]

original link:

[link to tkp.at (secure)]