White dots on a black background. About an hours work in videoediting software. At most.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1473577 Nope. True photos from a simple woman posted by a moderator in a local newspapers' website...taken the day of my 60th birthday without me knowing her nor this moderator, or her and him knowing my visions (4 + 1 angels in a cathedral for example).
Besides, the light intensities would be higher for the lights above the cathedral, or those on the right side above the building. Indeed, why would someone make UFOs up if one would barely see them?
Seriously?
YT "Haiti UFO", a verifiable fake. Now compare that to white dots dancing on a black screen. Easy as pie.
But, if there are shots from multiple angles of this "Orleans UFO", that puts a different complexion on the whole thing. So, are there any such photos or vids? No? Thought so.
Let me be clear!
The three photos in the OP of the 4+1+1 lights in the night sky, including the one on the right side above the building, are NOT a definitive proof of ET ships. You neither can prove that they are not.
My point is to put these images in the context of what I say since years for Orléans, France, related to the biblical End Times that recent and continuous news seem to confirm since two weeks, as the title of this thread and my interpretation of the Bible prophecy are all about. (along with the calculation of the 7 churches' period and the 70 years of the Queen ER II in Isaiah 23).
I would have loved to find other footage of this DEC 10 2021 UFO (unidentified Flying Objects) event seen from different perspectives. But I didn't find any. Given the brightness of the streetlights, and the short time of this UFO appearance, this is not surprising that no one else took a photo, or rather didn't share it.
I looked at the Orléans webcams, but it was impossible to correctly use the
'history' function at a normal time speed. So, these UFOs could have been over the cathedral without being observable. One hour flows in a matter of seconds in such a timelapse technique (what the
'history' actually is), i.e. a sequence of frames at set intervals to record changes that take place slowly over time. In other words, the video is changed into a series of images to spare gigaoctets day after day.
It is not because you can fake a photo that a specific photo is faked, especially when there are so weird accurate coincidences with private visions of mine, for the date and the lights' specifics (number and location).
You surely have noted that the slow way these lights moved can't be named
'dancing lights' for even the photographer said that she didn't see them moving. She saw that once she compared her photos, like we can do ourselves.
Of course, to answer to another poster after you, these lights can NOT be reflections of streetlights on the camera lens for 1) none corresponds to them (not bright enough, no locations match, no movement match), and 2) the light on the right side wouldn't exist (too close from the roof).
