| Users Online Now: 1,407 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 473,241 | |
| Pageviews Today: 618,494 | Threads Today: 193 | Posts Today: 2,577 |
| 05:26 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,407 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 473,241 | |
| Pageviews Today: 618,494 | Threads Today: 193 | Posts Today: 2,577 |
| 05:26 AM | ||
Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 30489486  United States12/29/2021 07:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ThePassenger
 User ID: 81690844  France12/29/2021 07:36 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80196381  Belgium12/29/2021 07:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta. Basically your article is fake news |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78008151 12/29/2021 07:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78579410 United States12/29/2021 07:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80096158 United States12/29/2021 07:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| 7seals
User ID: 80513033  Tajikistan12/29/2021 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Save Your Souls Right Now by Accepting the Invitation to the Kingdom of Heaven The BOOK of Seven Seals is opened: [link to disk.yandex.ru (secure)] The BOOK7S consists of a sheet black on one side and white on the other. The sheet (view from top) rolled up in S manner: it is the Ying-Yang symbol. So lines of the BOOK7S are written within and on the backside Rev 5:1 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1481539 United States12/29/2021 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80414145 United States12/29/2021 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta. Basically your article is fake news op is a liar or moron |
| Deplorable Zenobia
User ID: 81107037 United States12/29/2021 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how my local news I go to for weather has under their Fact or Fiction section this very claim. At the end of a very long 'news piece' bottom line was 'we rate this to be mostly not true.' Well, that's different since most of their lil' so-called fact checkers come up w/ 'we rate this to be pants on fire.'  Last Edited by Deplorable Zenobia on 12/29/2021 07:53 AM And thought struggles against the results, trying to avoid those unpleasant results while keeping on with that way of thinking. That is what I call 'sustained incoherence.' ...David Bohm “How, O Zenobia, hast thou dared to insult Roman emperors?” ...Aurelian, 44th Emperor of the Roman Empire |
| Wake up men
Star fleet is taking enrollments User ID: 81307556  Australia12/29/2021 07:53 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| GrimReaper20
(OP) User ID: 60953828 United States12/29/2021 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Some additional info blowing holes in the bottom of the "vaccines are safe & effective" boat: The European Journal of Immunology nonetheless demonstrates that natural immunity from prior infection is both durable and longer-lasting than vaccinated immunity, although elderly patients may benefit less from this form of immunity. [link to beckernews.com (secure)] Lancet Report (medical journal) - NOT a pandemic of the unvaxxed [link to noqreport.com (secure)] |
| sunwatcher
User ID: 81672926  Brazil12/29/2021 07:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta. Basically your article is fake news op is a liar or moron You've read just the "Abstract" section. If you had read the FULL TEXT you'd find, early in the text: "By comparison, both vaccines showed higher, longer-lasting protection against Delta. The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE" The study compared vacines' effectiveness against Delta and Omicron. Concluded they protect LESS against Delta and hence a negative protection margin (more likely to be infected with Omicron than with Delta). And stated that, due to this, boosts are needed to take the "protection" level for Omicron to the same for Delta. Nothing new but... WHO is the "moron" now? I'm becoming an expert in identifying bikes'n'boats thanks to GLP |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80588263 United States12/29/2021 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. Its typical though. Most people do that. Forget covid and just look at political party ideology. Conservatives refuse to hear anything from Demonrats and vice versa. Its not what people say, but WHO says it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81131544  South Africa12/29/2021 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81509491  Japan12/29/2021 08:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pasteboard.co (secure)] |
| S-man
User ID: 79737261 12/29/2021 08:11 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just collating evidence for Original Antigenic Sin. Quoting: S-man 80597117 UK HSA [link to ibb.co (secure)] (from page 21: [link to assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (secure)] ) DANISH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] (From Page 6: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] ) SWEDISH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] (from page 33/34 of [link to papers.ssrn.com (secure)] ) DUTCH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] from page 5: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] ) ONTARIO, Canada [link to ibb.co (secure)] (From Alex Berenson Substack) QATAR STUDY: not strictly related; concerns infection susceptibility just after vaccination [link to ibb.co (secure)] From page 9 of: [link to www.nejm.org (secure)] This Qatari study above makes you wonder how we get massive waves of infection right after vax campaigns, right?? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81027998  Canada12/29/2021 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| S-man
User ID: 79737261 12/29/2021 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wonder what this plot will look like for the next few weeks!? - Young vaccinated were suffering huge case rates just before Christmas.. Quoting: S-man Negative Efficiency for 18-69 year olds. [link to ibb.co (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81027998 Canada12/29/2021 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81455144 United States12/29/2021 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | their kids are dropping dead, their parents are dropping dead but they don't let that distract them from working for the people who murdered their children, they got to obey and get er done. but it's also because there is such perfected ignorance that they know NOTHING to contradict ANYTHING the media tells them. if yOU try to tell them the media is lying, who are YOU to tell them this? they instantly disagree with anyone who disagrees with 'power' |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81027998 Canada12/29/2021 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81509491 Japan12/29/2021 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was another document that was made inconvenient to find by the UK government. I had to try multiple excel programs to get it to load properly and it was formatted to chop 1/3 of the page to make it harder to read but this is the main course pieced together. I don't know if it applies as ADE or premeditated murder but it is certainly provocative... [link to pasteboard.co (secure)] |
| Quantum Joker
User ID: 68357957 Canada12/29/2021 08:20 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was reading on twitter the vaxxed were still justifying getting the shots by saying the unvaxxed were the ones in the ICU's. I know that goes against data from the uk and what Alex Berenson published last week. For the government of Ontario, they do say that of covid cases, the majority are unvaxxed. I'd have to look at data from each hospital to verify if that was true, which I didnt do. But I did look at ICU usage. Filling up the ICU's were: 30% of ICU's were free 7% in icus were covid cases 63% were non covid related cases Of course,they are not to say it,but vax injuries could be a big part of that 63%. "We must be clear that when it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry."--NIELS BOHR |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81512813 United States12/29/2021 08:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from the study Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80474288 it does not say what the op claims at all Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. However, the VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months. The VE is re-established upon revaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (54.6%, 95% CI: 30.4 to 70.4%).  Good catch. The anti vaxtards are the dumbest sheep of all. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81027998 Canada12/29/2021 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| SagoP
User ID: 79438412 United States12/29/2021 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81027998 Canada12/29/2021 08:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81396210  United Kingdom12/29/2021 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta. Basically your article is fake news They are questioning the negative affectivness in the comment section of the article. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78316435 United States12/29/2021 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
