Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,243 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 548,881
Pageviews Today: 878,842Threads Today: 353Posts Today: 5,592
09:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79017631
United States
12/29/2021 08:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show:

[link to www.wnd.com (secure)]

"The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative.

The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts?

The name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here.

So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80555734
United States
12/29/2021 09:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Omnicron hasn't even been around for 3 months so how do they know this?
GrimReaper20  (OP)

User ID: 60953828
United States
12/29/2021 09:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Willfully BLIND & vaxxed & boosted!
I swear it's nothing short of hilarious...like when you see every 5th car on the highway has some complete and total brain dead sheep driving alone AND WEARING A MASK...which btw, are PROVEN NOT TO WORK AGAINST VIRUSES! HAHAHAHA

Those are the idiots running to the front of the line to get their HORSEPISS "vaccines" and boosters on command, lol.

When they have to LITERALLY change the definition of "vaccine" when it's obvious they don't fucking work, you KNOW you've been duped.

Cognitive dissonance...like listening to a Mother repeat over and over "I know my son...he wouldn't have killed those people" when they're caught on video killing those people, lol...

"The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

Last Edited by GrimReaper20 on 12/29/2021 09:19 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80112049
United States
12/29/2021 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show:

[link to www.wnd.com (secure)]

"The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative.

The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all:

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination.


No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta.


Basically your article is fake news
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80196381


Stop spreading lies. Click on the INLINE. TABLE in the study. It clearly does support this.
GrimReaper20  (OP)

User ID: 60953828
United States
12/29/2021 09:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts?

The name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here.

So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


Ye Olde ad hominem attack, eh? (YAAAWN)

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79547642
12/29/2021 09:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Just collating evidence for Original Antigenic Sin.

UK HSA
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
(from page 21: [link to assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (secure)] )

DANISH STUDY
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
(From Page 6: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] )

SWEDISH STUDY
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
(from page 33/34 of [link to papers.ssrn.com (secure)] )

DUTCH STUDY
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
from page 5: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] )

ONTARIO, Canada
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
(From Alex Berenson Substack)

QATAR STUDY: not strictly related; concerns infection susceptibility just after vaccination
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
From page 9 of: [link to www.nejm.org (secure)]

This Qatari study above makes you wonder how we get massive waves of infection right after vax campaigns, right??
 Quoting: S-man 80597117

 Quoting: S-man


Not sure if clear: the above studies all seem to show NEGATIVE EFFECTIVENESS...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79547642
12/29/2021 09:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Wonder what this plot will look like for the next few weeks!? - Young vaccinated were suffering huge case rates just before Christmas..
Negative Efficiency for 18-69 year olds.
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
 Quoting: S-man

 Quoting: S-man


as does this....(Negative effectiveness)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80112049
United States
12/29/2021 09:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Wonder what this plot will look like for the next few weeks!? - Young vaccinated were suffering huge case rates just before Christmas..
Negative Efficiency for 18-69 year olds.
[link to ibb.co (secure)]
 Quoting: S-man

 Quoting: S-man


as does this....(Negative effectiveness)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79547642


Funny how AC goes quiet after obviously not reading the entire study. Fear is dropping off this one.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78144711
United States
12/29/2021 09:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
No one has any inner peace. All there seems to be is “righteous” hatred, anger, fear, cruelty and the rest of the evils. In todays world even monks probably have problems with inner peace. We are stuck in a bad cycle.

Ps- I’m sure this was all by design.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79221027
United Kingdom
12/29/2021 09:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


Open your mouth Timmy....let me spoon feed you some more bullshit.
Uncle Gintel

User ID: 80806534
United States
12/29/2021 09:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
This was already debunked as antivaxx click bait.



The actual study found that vaccined people were more likely to get Omnicron over than Delta or Alpha because the new strain has mutated so much that it has worked around the vaccine.
GrimReaper20  (OP)

User ID: 60953828
United States
12/29/2021 09:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
The hits keep coming with the scripted HORSESHIT COVID scam!

[link to thehill.com (secure)]

Good question earlier in this thread...when DO all these vaccines actually start working? After 9 boosters? 12? LOLOLOL...what idiotic robot sheep who actually got this mystery fluid jabbed into themselves! LOL

...and yes, I had COVID...it was like the mildest cold I've ever had that lasted all of about 2 days, then loss of smell for about 10 days. What did I take to overcome it?

...nothing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30489486
United States
12/29/2021 09:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Depends on the vax....

You really think China is giving it's citizens mRNA?
 Quoting: SagoP


Maybe not but the 3 yr old Argentina girl died from the chyna sinopharm vax anyway.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74402891
Canada
12/29/2021 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd.

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81524907


well said!

bump
Magnus Flatus

User ID: 80654191
Canada
12/29/2021 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show:

[link to www.wnd.com (secure)]

"The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative.

The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


At this point, we should consider the term: Conspiracy Scientist

Their rate of accurate predictions has entered the scientific realm of accuracy.
SkinnyChic

User ID: 80548993
United States
12/29/2021 09:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79017631
United States
12/29/2021 09:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts?

The name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here.

So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


Ye Olde ad hominem attack, eh? (YAAAWN)

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


You must not understand your own link, there was no fallacy. There's no need to attack the argument when it's coming from a source meant to mislead to begin with.

In the same way I wouldn't spend my time arguing with a drunk, or an insane homeless man. They don't care about facts, only getting people to see things their way.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79017631
United States
12/29/2021 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd.

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81524907


well said!

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74402891


Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance.

OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data.
Uncle Gintel

User ID: 80806534
United States
12/29/2021 09:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd.

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81524907


well said!

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74402891


Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance.

OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79017631



They never read the actual data.
Cap'n Slick

User ID: 79823269
Canada
12/29/2021 10:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


Would like to but there are 3 vaxed blocking the way for each “un”.
Cap'n Slick
BigSister

User ID: 81069379
United States
12/29/2021 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd.

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81524907


WND is controlled opposition as most of alt-media are. It's the same "cabal" speaking out of both sides of their mouth saying different and contradictory things to different people, so that people are left unsure or confused. Always half-baked stories for the purpose of leaking a little bit of truth yet still supporting "the narrative". The only reason they are NOW saying the vaccines are effective for 3 months is so they can push boosters and making way for permanent vaccine mandates. They've been wanting this almost since I can remember, since I was at least 16. Otherwise they wouldn't be saying it.

Truth is the vaccines aren't effective at all except for what is not what the public wants: to slowly weaken and reduce the population with generous amounts of "plausible deniability".

Last Edited by BigSister on 12/29/2021 10:10 AM
Your BigSister has some sage advice and opinions to offer characterized by wisdom, prudence, and good judgment through reflection and experience if you will receive it.
VampPatriot

User ID: 81682498
United States
12/29/2021 10:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


s0p-lafr22


Not seeing piles of dead unvaxxed, but seeing vaxxed dropping dead by the tons.
Sic Semper Tyrannis.

The F in Communism stands for Food.

"FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.
WAR IS PEACE.
STAYING APART BRINGS US TOGETHER." NWO Mantra
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4803585
United States
12/29/2021 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


Keep pushing your vomit loon.



crazyjak
Jereome
User ID: 80165861
United States
12/29/2021 10:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


Please explain that to my dead cousin that died recently in the hospital from Covid and she was FULLY vaxxed.

So stfu.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78664335
United States
12/29/2021 10:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


There’s a medRX study as the basis.
Logan Five

User ID: 78110001
Finland
12/29/2021 10:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show:

[link to www.wnd.com (secure)]

"The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative.

The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


See, it's safe and effective because derp.

derp2
Deep Sleep Sandman.
"Build Back Better" is a lie!
There is no "renewal"!
Logan Five

User ID: 78110001
Finland
12/29/2021 10:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731


Keep pushing your vomit loon.



crazyjak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4803585


I'm going to borrow that.
cheers
Deep Sleep Sandman.
"Build Back Better" is a lie!
There is no "renewal"!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70642091
United States
12/29/2021 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show:

[link to www.wnd.com (secure)]

"The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative.

The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people."

The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one
 Quoting: GrimReaper20


"Largest Flock of sheep"


....and largest group guinea pigs!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80170150
United States
12/29/2021 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
from the study
it does not say what the op claims at all

Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. However, the VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months. The VE is re-established upon revaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (54.6%, 95% CI: 30.4 to 70.4%).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80474288


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81688090


Good catch. The anti vaxtards are the dumbest sheep of all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81512813


super ultra mega "protection"

wow you vax tards will sure buy anthing....

Nothing does it say about "infection".

They are pulling the same TDS bs in journals by cleverly using words with no scientific meaning.
GrimReaper20  (OP)

User ID: 60953828
United States
12/29/2021 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected
highly reputable source you gronk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80534266


I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd.

[link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)]

The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81524907


well said!

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74402891


Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance.

OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79017631


DERRRrrrRRRRr:

[link to news.yahoo.com (secure)]

LOLOLOL...double jabbed no longer good enough! HAHA...WHAT FUCKING IDIOTS!

Enjoy your collapsing immune systems, folks!

"The Prime Minister said the “overwhelming majority” of those in ICU with the virus had not had a third jab and 2.4 million eligible adults already double-jabbed are yet to come forward."

Last Edited by GrimReaper20 on 12/29/2021 10:41 AM





GLP