Wait, wasn't this a "Conspiracy Theory" a month ago? Vaxxed way more likely to be infected | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79017631 United States 12/29/2021 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts? The name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here. So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80555734 United States 12/29/2021 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
GrimReaper20
(OP) User ID: 60953828 United States 12/29/2021 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Willfully BLIND & vaxxed & boosted! I swear it's nothing short of hilarious...like when you see every 5th car on the highway has some complete and total brain dead sheep driving alone AND WEARING A MASK...which btw, are PROVEN NOT TO WORK AGAINST VIRUSES! HAHAHAHA Those are the idiots running to the front of the line to get their HORSEPISS "vaccines" and boosters on command, lol. When they have to LITERALLY change the definition of "vaccine" when it's obvious they don't fucking work, you KNOW you've been duped. Cognitive dissonance...like listening to a Mother repeat over and over "I know my son...he wouldn't have killed those people" when they're caught on video killing those people, lol... "The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." Last Edited by GrimReaper20 on 12/29/2021 09:19 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80112049 United States 12/29/2021 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one Lol when you click on the link to the study in the article, it doesn't say that at all: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. No negative effectiveness. The study say vaccine work against omicron, just not as well as against delta. Basically your article is fake news Stop spreading lies. Click on the INLINE. TABLE in the study. It clearly does support this. |
GrimReaper20
(OP) User ID: 60953828 United States 12/29/2021 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts? Quoting: Anonymous CowardThe name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here. So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof. Ye Olde ad hominem attack, eh? (YAAAWN) [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79547642 12/29/2021 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just collating evidence for Original Antigenic Sin. Quoting: S-man 80597117 UK HSA [link to ibb.co (secure)] (from page 21: [link to assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (secure)] ) DANISH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] (From Page 6: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] ) SWEDISH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] (from page 33/34 of [link to papers.ssrn.com (secure)] ) DUTCH STUDY [link to ibb.co (secure)] from page 5: [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] ) ONTARIO, Canada [link to ibb.co (secure)] (From Alex Berenson Substack) QATAR STUDY: not strictly related; concerns infection susceptibility just after vaccination [link to ibb.co (secure)] From page 9 of: [link to www.nejm.org (secure)] This Qatari study above makes you wonder how we get massive waves of infection right after vax campaigns, right?? Not sure if clear: the above studies all seem to show NEGATIVE EFFECTIVENESS... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79547642 12/29/2021 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wonder what this plot will look like for the next few weeks!? - Young vaccinated were suffering huge case rates just before Christmas.. Quoting: S-man Negative Efficiency for 18-69 year olds. [link to ibb.co (secure)] as does this....(Negative effectiveness) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80112049 United States 12/29/2021 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wonder what this plot will look like for the next few weeks!? - Young vaccinated were suffering huge case rates just before Christmas.. Quoting: S-man Negative Efficiency for 18-69 year olds. [link to ibb.co (secure)] as does this....(Negative effectiveness) Funny how AC goes quiet after obviously not reading the entire study. Fear is dropping off this one. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78144711 United States 12/29/2021 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No one has any inner peace. All there seems to be is “righteous” hatred, anger, fear, cruelty and the rest of the evils. In todays world even monks probably have problems with inner peace. We are stuck in a bad cycle. Ps- I’m sure this was all by design. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79221027 United Kingdom 12/29/2021 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Uncle Gintel
User ID: 80806534 United States 12/29/2021 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The actual study found that vaccined people were more likely to get Omnicron over than Delta or Alpha because the new strain has mutated so much that it has worked around the vaccine. |
GrimReaper20
(OP) User ID: 60953828 United States 12/29/2021 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The hits keep coming with the scripted HORSESHIT COVID scam! [link to thehill.com (secure)] Good question earlier in this thread...when DO all these vaccines actually start working? After 9 boosters? 12? LOLOLOL...what idiotic robot sheep who actually got this mystery fluid jabbed into themselves! LOL ...and yes, I had COVID...it was like the mildest cold I've ever had that lasted all of about 2 days, then loss of smell for about 10 days. What did I take to overcome it? ...nothing |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30489486 United States 12/29/2021 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74402891 Canada 12/29/2021 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. well said! |
Magnus Flatus
User ID: 80654191 Canada 12/29/2021 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one At this point, we should consider the term: Conspiracy Scientist Their rate of accurate predictions has entered the scientific realm of accuracy. |
SkinnyChic
User ID: 80548993 United States 12/29/2021 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79017631 United States 12/29/2021 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do realize that's essentially a right-wing tabloid site, full of bullshit and opinions, but no facts? Quoting: Anonymous CowardThe name even screams fake news, it's nearly the same as the UK tabloid that's always tricking people here. So yes, it was a conspiracy, and still is, because a tabloid isn't proof. Ye Olde ad hominem attack, eh? (YAAAWN) [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] You must not understand your own link, there was no fallacy. There's no need to attack the argument when it's coming from a source meant to mislead to begin with. In the same way I wouldn't spend my time arguing with a drunk, or an insane homeless man. They don't care about facts, only getting people to see things their way. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79017631 United States 12/29/2021 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. well said! Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance. OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data. |
Uncle Gintel
User ID: 80806534 United States 12/29/2021 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. well said! Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance. OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data. They never read the actual data. |
Cap'n Slick
User ID: 79823269 Canada 12/29/2021 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BigSister
User ID: 81069379 United States 12/29/2021 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. WND is controlled opposition as most of alt-media are. It's the same "cabal" speaking out of both sides of their mouth saying different and contradictory things to different people, so that people are left unsure or confused. Always half-baked stories for the purpose of leaking a little bit of truth yet still supporting "the narrative". The only reason they are NOW saying the vaccines are effective for 3 months is so they can push boosters and making way for permanent vaccine mandates. They've been wanting this almost since I can remember, since I was at least 16. Otherwise they wouldn't be saying it. Truth is the vaccines aren't effective at all except for what is not what the public wants: to slowly weaken and reduce the population with generous amounts of "plausible deniability". Last Edited by BigSister on 12/29/2021 10:10 AM Your BigSister has some sage advice and opinions to offer characterized by wisdom, prudence, and good judgment through reflection and experience if you will receive it. |
VampPatriot
User ID: 81682498 United States 12/29/2021 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731 Not seeing piles of dead unvaxxed, but seeing vaxxed dropping dead by the tons. Sic Semper Tyrannis. The F in Communism stands for Food. "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH. WAR IS PEACE. STAYING APART BRINGS US TOGETHER." NWO Mantra |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4803585 United States 12/29/2021 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jereome User ID: 80165861 United States 12/29/2021 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78664335 United States 12/29/2021 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Logan Five
User ID: 78110001 Finland 12/29/2021 10:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one See, it's safe and effective because derp. Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Logan Five
User ID: 78110001 Finland 12/29/2021 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please explain this to the thousands of unvaxxed dying in hospitals across the USA. I'm sure it will be a relief. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81690731 Keep pushing your vomit loon. I'm going to borrow that. Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70642091 United States 12/29/2021 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You couldn't have SCRIPTED a bigger clown show: Quoting: GrimReaper20 [link to www.wnd.com (secure)] "The study shows that after three months, the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5% more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people." The vaxxed are the largest flock of sheep in the history of mankind...totally swindled from day one "Largest Flock of sheep" ....and largest group guinea pigs! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80170150 United States 12/29/2021 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from the study Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80474288 it does not say what the op claims at all Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination. However, the VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months. The VE is re-established upon revaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (54.6%, 95% CI: 30.4 to 70.4%). Good catch. The anti vaxtards are the dumbest sheep of all. super ultra mega "protection" wow you vax tards will sure buy anthing.... Nothing does it say about "infection". They are pulling the same TDS bs in journals by cleverly using words with no scientific meaning. |
GrimReaper20
(OP) User ID: 60953828 United States 12/29/2021 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't know enough about wnd to trust them. Seems like all media is super biased at this point. But there is the link to the actual study right there in the article so we can evaluate for ourselves. In a world where the entire media apparatus has been corrupted it doesn't seem reasonable to just stick with the sources you've always liked because they have used their reputations to bamboozle everyone. Gotta verify everything. Anyway, here's the link to the study itself sanitized and purified of any association with wnd. [link to www.medrxiv.org (secure)] The funny and tragic part is that you could have gone there yourself and clicked the link but you didn't because you don't think wnd is reputable and thus cut yourself off from information. well said! Did you not bother to read the data, or not understand it? The study in OPs link actually says the exact opposite. It shows protection offered by the vaccine, and a decline in effectiveness as time passes. Nowhere does it say you become more likely to be infected or negative resistance. OP doesn't know how to read data, and sheep will follow their bias without confirmation of data. DERRRrrrRRRRr: [link to news.yahoo.com (secure)] LOLOLOL...double jabbed no longer good enough! HAHA...WHAT FUCKING IDIOTS! Enjoy your collapsing immune systems, folks! "The Prime Minister said the “overwhelming majority” of those in ICU with the virus had not had a third jab and 2.4 million eligible adults already double-jabbed are yet to come forward." Last Edited by GrimReaper20 on 12/29/2021 10:41 AM |