Judge Winsor in Doe v. Austin et. al. declared there is no FDA approved vaccine available to the public.

Fake an EMERGENCY BIG ENOUGH-


you can steal an ELECTION, a NATION,

A n d a W O R L D !!!

and WE SAW THEM DO IT .

“Never Again!”

*********************

That little two word phrase is what Israel as a

People, and as a state say as an OATH

to each other.


Not just as a sacred oath to die for each

other . . . But as an OATH to those

who would attempt to destroy their people.
******************************^^^

We WILL WIN AGAINST THE evil thieves,

and we will even attempt to save those,

who in their ignorance have supported

the evil thieves that would steal our health and lives, our children,

and the future!

Yes that's what the news media is running with. They're saying "it's available" because "it's basically the same thing" as the current Pfizer EUA shot.

But Pfizer cannot be sued if you take the EUA shot and get hurt! And they don't have to provide an ingredient insert. And the other EUA things would be ILLEGAL. They're NOT. They're still around.

That means that the "approved" shot is NOT available.

Right!

Big Harma is so evil that they're willing to sacrifice the kids to their poison to avoid any and all liability. They'll sacrifice the whole damn planet.

asi8prn0knme98kl2,mfwij

Thread: Sorry I'm calling Israel vaxcd fake.. included a card read.

^^^

2 months old.

Fauci must pay for the crimes he has committed against God’s children. We have to keep up the conversation on holding that rat accountable. The earth and karma will rejoice righteously at his suffering.

They release stuff like this to calm an uprising

It will never be “approved “ as long as there are people who won’t take the shot. The can be held liable after full approval. They will not acknowledge ANY injuries because they could be made to stop giving them. Then there would be a mass hysteria worldwide from those who have taken it.
The fda has only “approved “ (eua) the monoclonal antibodies, Remdesivir and the jab. All other drugs are considered off-label use.

It’s funny that it is ok for a doctor to write a prescription for an antibiotic or steroid for covid which would technically be considered off label but others are practically forbidden (the ones that work). A steroid or antibiotic safety profile isn’t as good as ivm.

Now they have the pill that supposedly works that is getting ready to be approved. I thought if there were drugs that worked for a disease that a vaccine wouldn’t be approved.

You also may notice the drug makers do not advertise the shots. Why?
There is a reason....

We know you meant RFK Jr

Not sure if it was the whole province of BC or just Vancouver but I'll just say its the whole province thats (apparently) 90% vaccinated.

But no herd immunity yet?

Emergency?? Lol..for something 99.8% survivable???hahaha

its here get used to it .you will do whatever the powers that be want trust me

So legally they can't mandate a EAU drug and the DOD is illegally making them take it but they said who cares ...

Not sure if that is really true. Laws passed by Congress in 1986, The US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and it's amendments have created a court for compensation for vaccine injury if found true. The problem is this court favors the vaccine manufacturers more often than not. And you can go on to sue if you don't like the decision of the court, but are not likely to succeed. The bar has been set very high. The Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of vaccine manufacturers over childhood injury saying basically that lawsuits would inhibit vaccine manufacturers.

So, I really doubt if fear of lawsuits is the reason Pfizer hasn't made Corminaty available. I think the more likely reason is they don't want to release the list of ingredients or make data available because of national security issues. Think biowarfare.

Anyone else familiar with The Borrower's?

Wrong thread.

WOW! Excellent find OP!!! Thank you for sharing!!

They only lost the injunction. The case is still in the flurry of motions stage, with a repleading due on December 15th, discovery due by 5/9/2022, and a trial set for 9/14/2022 unless its been dismissed - I only saw data up to December 1st so I'd be curious to see a more current set of data and I don't want to pay PACER if I don't have to.....

Last Edited by Paul Drake on 01/06/2022 02:26 AM

This thread got me wondering. Is the PCR test FDA approved? According to goggle:

Featured snippet from the web
Is this test FDA-approved or cleared? No. This test is not yet approved or cleared by the United States FDA. FDA may issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, available alternatives.Nov 8, 2021

Verily COVID-19 RT-PCR Test - Patient Fact Sheet

Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Is this test FDA-approved or cleared? No. This test is not yet approved or cleared by the United States FDA. FDA may issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, available alternatives.Nov 8, 2021

www.fda.gov › media › download PDF

Verily COVID-19 RT-PCR Test - Patient Fact Sheet


Hmm.

Thats the irony of the whole situation - they want to say it's identical, basically the same thing, interchangeable, but in the same document explicitly state it is two legally distinct products. Can't have it both ways...... I'd like to see a court case that is standing on just that one document.

It is the media who has been implicated in every genocide studied over the recent past. They serve as the propaganda mouthpiece, the alibi and excuse cover for the genocide and the institution that sets up acceptance of atrocities and injustice against the intended target.
The media telling us cold weather increases strokes and strokes are normal in children is doing one thing: planting seeds in minds so that those minds don’t see the genocide in front of them/

There is zero righteousness in rejoicing with anybody's suffering.
If karma was true, we’d all die within five minutes.

Here's the Section 564:

Federal law generally prohibits anyone from introducing or delivering for introduction into interstate commerce any “new drug” or “biological product” unless and until FDA has approved the drug or product as safe and effective for its intended uses. See, e.g., FDCA §§ 301(a), 505(a), 21
U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 355(a); 42 U.S.C § 262(a). A vaccine is both a drug and a biological product. See FDCA § 201(g), 21 U.S.C § 321(g); 42 U.S.C.

§ 262(i)(1). Consistent with section 564, we will generally refer to it here as a “product.” See FDCA § 564(a)(4)(C) (defining “product” to mean “a drug, device, or biological product”).

Note: BIOLOGIC is not the same-as VACCINE.

A BIOLOGIC which uses a pathogenic mRNA creation process which stimulates intended and unintended affects / effects on the body's immune system which creates narrowly focused antigens as opposed to naturally occurring antigens produced in the course of a "normal" infection process.

The BIOLOGIC at best produces some protection which is not the same as immunization i.e. immunity. Where-in as immunity is to not transmit the disease where-as "protection" could transmit the disease.

There is a big difference.

Considering the entire internet's definition of "vaccine" have been amended to include the pseudo-biologic as another type of "vaccine," which it is not -- it's is a BIOLOGIC. Not a true vaccine which stimulates productions of antigens thus equating to total immunity.

There are huge errors in logic in the ideology that EUA = licensed COMIRNATY BIOLOGIC products which is separate from the EUA product. COMIRNATY is completely a virtual fabrication alleged to bait and switch the EUA product into which the only reason could be facilitating a mass vaccine mandate -- on it's face it is disingenuous and begs the question which also answers the same:

Bait-and-Switch was designed to cover-up allegedly for the fact that the EUA product and the virtual COMIRNATY "licensed" product which does not exist in reality is just a container for the other product to fit nicely in which bypasses normal checks and procedures which only a BLA approved facility can answer and provide documentation.

Why?

Because none of the EUA products allegedly have the necessary quality assurance paper trail documentation for purity due to not being manufactured in a BLA approved facility.

IMHO, just because the EUA was instituted does not override quality assurance and safety. By no means.

That is the essence of the Constitutionality of this entire issue.

On its face, it is improper and disingenuous and should be stricken, removed, and if it requires invalidating the EUA, then so be it.

That is the core of the rotten apple they've ask us to eat.

From a poisonous tree, even.

And the emergency use authorization is also invalid because there are effective treatments already available, which is exactly whey they keep lying about Ivermectin and HCQ.