Supreme Court ruling for medical workers allows for religious and medical exemptions

That's if the medical field follows the ruling.

The pattern is that if exemptions are granted, and usually they are not, even the ones granted are limited and rescinded over time and the request for jab or be terminated with no other option. They inevitably determine that the exemptions are not justified for no reason other than they decide your reasons are no longer legitimate to them.
That's what I've seen over and over.

Now that's it's an official ruling you have grounds to sue.

Its actually Federal, and worded right in the decision AND ROBUST.

Its a different kind of win. It means, that any discrimination can be taken to court and appealed if a bad judge doesn't realize the precedent is set.

Religious Mandate is the way to go, its a strong moral belief legally.

SUCH As the right to personal integrity and sovereignity over your body.

SUCH as purging the Bell versus Buck decision that the US Supreme Court made in the 20's that had forced sterilization for decades on poor women and that Hitler loved, and published praise of in the newspapers and based his eugenics program on.

It was repudiated after WW2, and the Nuremburg Code tried and even executed those retroactively in the past who followed those corrupt laws, and promoted as safe and good experimental horrendous devices and procedures upon people without informed voluntary consent.

It is a HUGE STRONG MORAL BELIEF. Freedom, personal sanctity of your body, and strong robust informed voluntary consent that has tied into the laws, no retaliation permitted, not put on leave without pay.