Just so you guys know, I’m a lawyer in NYC and the scotus ruling is pointless.
OSHA has no bearing on 32BJ. 32BJ forced vaxx is acting based on an arbitration award and then the memoranda negotiated with RAB (lawyers who represents thousands of residential bldgs in nyc) and then the NYC law.
See how that works?
It’s all theatre. Enjoy your graphene.
Quoting: It’s all theatre 77112757 There are many places where the unions said "no" and the government backed down.
It's like you Qtards get paid to miss the entire point
Similar to how the entire point of the orange trojan horse puppet PSY-OP, is for Trump to condition the citizenry into submission, by forcing us to play their rigged game, by their rigged rules, after passing unconstitutional laws for decades, to paint us into this tyrannical corner we find ourselves unconstitutionally quarantined in, with a diaper on our face, while the same thin blue crooked line, that has been protecting these corrupt politicians for decades, shits all over the Constitution, for our safety, and their protection
Notice how the Qtards are trying to spin this as a win
You clapping like a hive mind, shit for brains seal? Lol
Learn to read, fuck wad.
You do what Robert Barnes, top attorney, said:
1. You get it in statement, policy statement writing. Because these guys are slippery eels, if they lay you off and say its because of the vaxx requirement but its actually not in writing as their policy, then in court they say you were incompetent and lie.
2. You find out what their insurance and health insurance coverage is, for the experimental vaxx? In case of injury and death.
Often these companies don't even know the half of it, and rely in CNN.
Many folded when those 2 demands were put in.
3. Then you demand they speak with their malpraciticing corporate lawyers to see why they're giving illegal advice, since Supreme Court just insured we can sue and appeal and own your company? Do they have Big Pharma as clients?
Again many companies withdraw demands at this point.
4. Then you demand a religious exemption and point out that the SC ruling assured that the mandates are illegal but in the health care field, ROBUST RELIGOUS AND MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS WERE GRANTED IN THE JUDGEMENT.
You tell them the legal definition of a religious exemption is a strong moral belief that cannot be questioned or refused, and cannot have any penalty such as unpaid leave attached or loss of job security as it is religious discrimination, and you give an example: Buck Versus Bell of the 1920's started the Eugenics era that saw many poor women sterilized and bodily integrity destroyed. Hitler praised the decision and based his eugenics on it. WW2 overturned that with robust laws and the Nuremburg Code, and informed VOLUNTARY consent, and you believe in execution of those who violate it very strongly and that is international law, so its an extremely strong moral belief.
ONLY THE STUPIDEST COMPANIES CONTINUE, AND THEY'RE LAW SUITS.
