BREAKING INTEL: Russia Expected to Use Tactical Nuclear Iskander Missiles on 1st Strike of Ukraine!

Ukraine is reacting “seriously” to UK Foreign Office allegations that Moscow has plans to invade the country and install a puppet government, a senior government adviser has said, adding that Kyiv is resisting Russian efforts to destabilise its government and economy.

The extraordinary Foreign Office claims that Moscow may topple the government and install Yevhen Murayev, a former MP who controls a pro-Russia television station, were met with shock and some scepticism in Ukrainian political and media circles on Sunday.

[link to www.theguardian.com (secure)]

They can be used with a conventional warhead

They should use it on NATO HQ instead.

Though this would be dumb, if your going to use nukes, use It on the real threats not some shithole like Ukraine where the real enemies can nuke you in retaliation for Ukraine

Last Edited by VampPatriot on 01/23/2022 03:57 PM

This is some genuine grade A, unadulterated, sour smelling BULL-SHIT!

They also carry conventional warheads, FYI

a nuke sends a message.

my expectation has been tac nukes at the start,
it changes everything.

Well the US justified use of Nuclear weapons to save American Lives

fixed

Last Edited by Pentagonal#Triangle on 01/23/2022 04:08 PM

Sounds like some classic CIA fearmongering and false flag tactics. But thanks as always doorbert.

Total Horse Manure.

I was there were Zero-Star option.

It's an Q operation, produced by the CIA. You're right. It's 100% bullshit.

Russia Russia Russia…

… you guys are still buying Russia as the big bad guy?

If they do that Biden might whisper at them. That will show them!!!

Who the duck writes this shit? No one is 'tactical' nuking anything.. ever. LOL.

So either Russia installs a sock puppet or NATO does meanwhile the fallout fucks up everything.

This is what the US and NATO are facing.

This is NOT a fucking game.





[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Well thats just stupid.

Iskander first strike will be conventional warheads and targeted at hangars, fuel depots, ammo depots, radar stations, and most importantly command and control centers.

They have big fat warheads designed to smash alot of shit in one hit.

Putin isnt gonna use nukes right out of the gate.

Why would Russia nuke Ukraine that makes no sense

I second that notion.

Stupid to consider that for a nano second.

They are conventional weapons. Accurate, fast and very deadly. Used for HQ command posts and fixed targets. If used, say bye bye to airfield towers, aircraft on the ground, and underground bunkers. Isk-K are cruise, and Isk-M are ballistic but both with a unique variable trajectory and extremely fast and hard to defeat.

Why on earth would they do that ? Plenty of their own would get fried.
This is the final straw. This is Peppa Pig !!!
Apparently the British PM [ in about as sticky a situation domestically as he can be in ] has decided to stir the shit. He is big mates with the Ukranian PM. He is bigging it up as a warlord now, he wants NATO to go in.[ So far NATO not keen.] To try and save his own pig skin.
Do these people ever learn anything ?
Tony Blair was the last British PM to go to war on a lie. His name is infamy here. He got a gong from the Queen in the New Year Honours and MILLIONS !!!! signed a petition against it.
POLITICS - LAST REFUGE OF A SCOUNDREL

Looks like that tiny M.Eastern country with a blue and white flag is running the head line feed. Maybe THEY can get Iran into the narrative as well.

one tactical nuke could take out dozens of tanks
and it forces NATO to disperse their army, they'll
be scrambling to reduce concentrated buildup etc.

.

As someone has pointed out they can be used for conventional warheads.

Russia doesn't need a nuke first strike to do what they are going to do.

Sh*ts doomy.

It's not, Iskander isnt solely a nuclear ballistic missile its more likely to be used with a conventional warhead