VIDEO: Ludwig von Mises vs. Karl Marx (Capitalism vs. Socialism)

https://imgur.com/a/6B4H6Ro

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

https://imgur.com/a/85CtArg

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

Karl Marx was a front man. Communism was created by British Intelligence to destroy its enemies and solidify British control of international banking. I mean that's something you should know before you take many of his ideas seriously. They were made to destroy countries and that's what they did. It's sad but the British picked Marx because he was as close to a living grotesque anti-Semitic caricature as they could find. In his role as front man for communism/socialism, he was meant to be offensive and infuriating and condescending to basically everyone to the point that it would be familiar to fans of pro wrestling how he proudly wears the character of a blatant heel, i.e. he even played it up to make his bosses happy.

The Soviet Union was industrially dysfunctional leading up to WWII because of Marx's objectively scientifically wrong ideas about manufacturing and industrial policy etc. The US had to send Dr Armand Hammer to help them fix up their industrial production in order to beat Hitler.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Communism/socialism was also in part made to destroy the great enemy of aristocracies: liberty. Universities were bought off and liberty was replaced with libertarian. Libertarian means the government doing nothing. Liberty is the government doing things for the common good and shared benefit to all. If a socialist policy seems to actually work, it's most like a liberty in socialist disguise, and socialism taking credit for liberty.

Karl Marx was a front man. Communism was created by British Intelligence to destroy its enemies and solidify British control of international banking. I mean that's something you should know before you take many of his ideas seriously. They were made to destroy countries and that's what they did. It's sad but the British picked Marx because he was as close to a living grotesque anti-Semitic caricature as they could find. In his role as front man for communism/socialism, he was meant to be offensive and infuriating and condescending to basically everyone to the point that it would be familiar to fans of pro wrestling how he proudly wears the character of a blatant heel, i.e. he even played it up to make his bosses happy.

The Soviet Union was industrially dysfunctional leading up to WWII because of Marx's objectively scientifically wrong ideas about manufacturing and industrial policy etc. The US had to send Dr Armand Hammer to help them fix up their industrial production in order to beat Hitler.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Communism/socialism was also in part made to destroy the great enemy of aristocracies: liberty. Universities were bought off and liberty was replaced with libertarian. Libertarian means the government doing nothing. Liberty is the government doing things for the common good and shared benefit to all. If a socialist policy seems to actually work, it's most like a liberty in socialist disguise, and socialism taking credit for liberty.

As Thomas Piketty has analyzed Capitol in the 21st century -

inflation favors the holders of substantial capitol simply because they can afford the economic advisers needed to outperform the working class's return on investments.

Thus the rich get richer during inflation.

Slow growth economic policies favor the holders of substantial capitol because the return on Capitol is higher than the growth in savings. Therefore the rich get richer during slow growth.

Who stands for inflation and slow growth? liberals.

Sure. You can roll back all socialist precepts. Ditch all labor laws.

Drop all requirements for employers to provide safe work environments.

Drop all requirements for wages. You all can work for.25 cents an hour or less.

Drop all restrictions on employer usury.


Why stop there though. Go for the big socialist ideologies!

Eradicate ownership of private property.

Eradicate the Bill of Rights!

"We the people" sounds pretty socialistic. Kill it.

The choice of socialism or capitalism isn’t actually a choice when the people of a country don’t have control over the currency they use. We will get whatever economic system the controllers of the currency want us to have.

Not in all cases.
Under Hitler for example...

Both were non-gentiles.

Capitalism and Communism. Just the two sides of the non-gentile coin of control over the gentiles.

Capitalism is control of money from above and Communism is control of revolution from below pretending to oppose each other.

Capitalism and Commun!$m are two sides of the same coin.
Commun!$m - State sponsored and enforced Usury
Capitalism- Bank sponsored and enforced Usury

Either way you end up fucked.

National Socialism is the only way.

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]
[link to imgur.com (secure)]


[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]
[link to imgur.com (secure)]

National Socialism is the only way.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom
brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only
whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of
voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later
as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system
involved."
~Ludwig von Mises, 1929
Chapter XX: Interest, Credit Expansion, The Trade Cycle, § 8
: The Monetary or Circulation Theory of the Trade Cycle



“We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences
of ignoring reality.”
~Ayn Rand

So why aren't you enjoying it?

Marxism ordered and written by J syndicate operative
with one goal - destruction of free enterprise ( capitalism )
meaning destruction of Western Civilization and enslaving humans.

.
.
.
.
...


...




Realistically the ultimate form of society will be a hybrid of socialism and capitalism with set in stone checks and balances that cannot be corrupted or subjected to fraud...