Kentucky wants to criminalize free speech

Ass backwards Kentucky. No gambling, unless its lottery or betting on a horse race. No legal cannabis medical or otherwise. Worst roads I have ever had the displeasure of using. Tolls to use the bridges to get to Indiana. If you can't tell I absolutely hate the shit hole called Kentucky. Doesn't surprise me they want to criminalize free speech. Their governor Beshear is the biggest cry baby bitch. Corrupt to the core.

Shot down and did not go up for a vote. If all you know of Ky. is the Louisville area, no wonder you don't like it. The rest of the state is with you on that. The bluegrass and eastern areas are top notch if you wear man pants.

You are alive today. This is something.

You may be able today to go to a cafe and eat outdoors, but don't let your guard down. Tomorrow will be worse.

Americans must be totally obsessed with freedom now.

Every conversation, thought, and action must be spent looking for loopholes, resisting, and prepping.

The elites want to kill you.

How could care you about anything else?

Western Kentucky is another gem.

Much like DC, no one in Kentucky pays attention to the man supposedly in charge.

There is no sanity in the USA anymore.

How can you deal with Americans when they look you in the eye and say that the US had TSA groping in 1776?

they dont have teeth to brush! fuckem ,,least they let us know where they stand.

Who's gonna determine the offensive gestures? Snopes? Google?

See how stupid this gets?

FREE SPEECH IS A THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY!!!


Last Edited by Festus J. Hoggbottom, III on 04/25/2022 08:23 PM

Americans said that they hated freedom 100 years ago because the environment was dirty, there were murders, and medicine was dangerous, but the US is now a police state and the environment is still dirty, there are still murders, and medicine is still dangerous.

Mitch Mcconnels state

I legit hope kentucky is the first to get nuked if putin goes through with it.

Not it's not lol it's a shithole

Admit it.

There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

If there is no victim, there is no crime.

We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of freedom?

Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

Who wants to live in a prison?

Think. Question everything.