|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Where did God come from?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
Archaeopteryx is one of many transitional dinosaur/birds. There are many transitional fossils, no matter how much you stick your head in the sand and ignore them.
Do you understand that there isn't a single land animal in the Cambrian?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80131628 Archaeopteryx is a bird, not a transitional dinosaur/bird. It has teeth, fingers, and a reptilian tail. If I remove the feathers from archaopteryx, you would never call it a bird. I have tested Creationists on this, and they can't tell the difference between an archaeopteryx and a raptor. Your problem with the cambrian explosion is a huge number of animals arising at the same time. That debunks the theory of evolution. The fossil records contradict you.
The bible puts creation in stages.
Quoting: Just†Me It's not 'my problem.' It seems to be yours. The cambrian spans millions of years. No land animals exist. It doesn't debunk evolution at all, that's just your baseless assertion. For evolution to work, you need to demonstrate a TREE where species gradually morph into various shapes and you cant. The tree is a diagram that accounts for billions of years of events. You can't literally demonstrate the tree. That makes no sense. However, the entire fossil record, and the field of phylogenics are entirely consistent with the tree of life. All the evidence is consistent with the tree of life. Instead the cambrian explosion shows different types of life arose at the same time in a very short lifespan in the history of earth. You can pretend like this doesnt debunk evolution all you want, but it does. Quoting: Just†Me No, it doesn't debunk evolution. Only an ignorant person would say this. Millions of years is not a very short time span. And just because we haven't found every generation of organism, doesn't mean they didn't exist. 99% of life doesn't fossilize at all, and prior to life evolving skeletons, they wouldn't leave even less fossil evidence. Yes, that is also consistent with evolution theory. Why do toothless birds still have the genes for teeth? and tails? Why would God put useless genes into his creation, Unless those genes were being used in the past? Again, If I remove the feathers of Archaeopteryx, you couldn't tell it apart from other theropods. It's skeleton is closer to a dinosaur than any modern bird. Go compare for yourself.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
