Why is orgasm never discussed in the bible ?

Pretty sure King David had an orgasm bagging another man's wife.

You're an amazing poster, OP. Everyone always asks the stupid questions, but you my friend ask the most important ones.

The palm sisters you go to bed with must love you.

Like everything else in history, it was probably 'sanitized'.

I'm pretty sure all of the folks mentioned in the bible had orgasms...

but then again, why isn't it discussed ? For almost everything else there is some godly opinion. Even the hairs on the heads of peeps. But the orgasm, such an intrinsic part of being human, nada..

I think this to be strange.

it's is discussed ...

Onan had to marry his late brother's widow ... Onan didn't want to get children w/ her, so he shot his wad on the ground ... God didn't like Coitus Interruptus, that was end of Onan's story, or Onan, he dead ... the term onanism comes from that

I know about Onan, but that's not what I mean. What I mean goes more into the direction of technicalities, the energies experienced during orgasms, the life-giving-godly-energy, the WHYs ? Why beat around the bush in regards to such a godly process ?

You need to study history. The concept of orgasm was first recognized by Theodor Orgasmus in 432 A.D.

interesting, thank you

those energies are discussed in satanic, heathen religions and teachings, like Tantra ... they don't belong to Bible

do you have any link ?

Brilliant. What a fine mind you have.
/s

why not ?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I guessed so... pathetic

Yes it is stop trolling this poor people

Because the orgasm is the single most intense inner emotion that it literally cannot be discussed or written about. Never in history has there ever been a subject so taboo that there can be no conversation about it.

in the OT, Patriarchs, Patriots and Prophets are fighting all the time against pagan fertility cults and their sex rituals, temple prostitution, knocking down phallic Asherah poles etc ... sex was the enemy

why was that so ? is this exactly why it would not have been important to clearly specify this topic of orgasm ? to prevent disputes and war about it ? to lay out the truth about it ?

err: isn't this exactly why the orgasm should have been clearly discussed and truth be told about it... after all it's part of the 'be fruitful and multiply'-command.

Nice question…didn’t the guy that studied the Dead Sea scrolls suggest that the New Testament was all about mushrooms, cocks and sex parties?

procreational yes, recreational no

It’s in Levi 15

Cuz it's the book of cockblock.

John Allegro wrote the book the Sacred Mushroom and the Cross, but there was nothing about sex in that if memory serves

yes that is what is being said. but even when only for procreational, still the the thematization of the orgasm is omitted.

"Song of songs" should be rated X

It talks about oral sex A LOT.

Titties, pubic hair, etc

Pretty sure they got off too

and the two shall become one flesh’; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh. Mark 10:8

It's possible there are allusions or allegories that are not apparent outside of the original language it was composed in.

The scribes were known to insert puns in a number of methods to accomplish this.

Immaculate Conception is immaculate because there is no sex ivolved. Sex is our punishment.