| Users Online Now: 2,074 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,883,033 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,783,129 | Threads Today: 756 | Posts Today: 15,825 |
| 10:44 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,074 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,883,033 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,783,129 | Threads Today: 756 | Posts Today: 15,825 |
| 10:44 PM | ||
NASA released photos of strange alien towers discovered on Mars, but they were quickly censored | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80015385  Canada05/23/2022 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82675033 Canada05/23/2022 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator  05/23/2022 02:23 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76897720  United States05/23/2022 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| DelusionsOfGranduer
User ID: 80555886 United States05/23/2022 02:29 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Super Saiyan
User ID: 81549323 United States05/23/2022 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81480701 United States05/23/2022 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA would NOT even release anything 'secret' to begin with. NASA is all lies. Astro-nut and all like him believe in the big lie. It's all BS. What THEY push as space is all mind garbage. If I show you half of the equation...and you think that is all you need to know and that is all there is to know, you aren't thinking for yourself. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80581632 No, I'm sorry. Just the written historical records prove what we know and understand today. I have spent over 35 years in aviation. I've been to 58k in altitude for instrument checks. At that height (which starts around 52K) the sky above is dark due to the lack of the suns reflection from the earth. The curvature of the earth is highly visible. The strangest thing is the horizon. It curves. You are able to see for miles and miles at that height. Even though the cabin is pressurized you can feel the effects. Just like scuba diving past to atmospheres. I don't know about NASA but, It's all real. The moon, stars our universe is all real. Cut and dry, we live on a globe (biosphere). We are held down by dark matter that we don't fully understand. I just want to know more about Sirius. Many questions there. when we read your post we all know youre lying about your profession, or lying about what youve seen because theres a lot of footage out now where people send up a high altitude balloon to heights above 120k feet. Guess what? zero curve. so to hear you say you can see one at half the distance is preposterous. Go back to sleep. No lies. None. I meant no disrespect. Just detailing what I have seen. i said those are your only options of which you are lying about. You can pick one. There is zero curve at 120k feet which you can easily check out. So if theres zero curve at 120k feet, you saying you can see a curve at 58k feet is preposterous. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80183952 United States05/23/2022 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Chinaman
User ID: 77082211 United States05/23/2022 02:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82362112 Canada05/23/2022 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and astro derails another thread with "wrong" spam. Check the ego, kid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82362112 Not ego, just facts. Don't like it? Don't make and don't support blatantly false claims like this: ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79816402 And life is but a dream! You make it sound like a Pleorama from the Chicago World’s Fair. Times change bro. Paradigms change. You ain’t so smart!  Lmfao if you actually had a scope and seen it, IT IS A PLASMA ORB! YOU’RE the one who “ain't so smart!” MORON Wrong. :Marsrotate: WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. None of the comments are mine. A blurry bigfoot pic doesn't make it real. |
| New Atlantis
User ID: 71482307 United States05/23/2022 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| New Atlantis
User ID: 71482307 United States05/23/2022 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Manufactured disinfo. Mars is a translucent light in the firmament dome, and nothing gets past the firmament. NASA pushes the globe hoax/psyop and the lie that we can go to "space" with stories like this -- structures on Mars, aliens on the moon, supposed spaceships spotted by "astronauts," etc. Last Edited by New Atlantis on 05/23/2022 02:46 PM "What you think, you become." - Buddha |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81246638  United Kingdom05/23/2022 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall. Now let's do some math based on the actual image, not the CGI render made by some random YouTuber. We have a lot of useful data here: Scaled pixel width: 2.87 meters Incidence angle: 42.23° [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] So the pixel scale is about 2.87 meters per pixel, the sun angle is 42.23 degrees from zenith or 47.77 degrees from the horizon. The shadow length is about 6.4 pixels at best for the middle and rightmost "tower" or 18.368 meters long. The height of the "tower" is tan(47.77 degrees)*18.368 meters = 20 meters. That is orders of magnitude smaller than the 4.8 km quoted in sensational articles like this: [link to www.firstpost.com (secure)] |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and astro derails another thread with "wrong" spam. Check the ego, kid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82362112 Not ego, just facts. Don't like it? Don't make and don't support blatantly false claims like this: ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80176690 Lmfao if you actually had a scope and seen it, IT IS A PLASMA ORB! YOU’RE the one who “ain't so smart!” MORON Wrong.  WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. None of the comments are mine. A blurry bigfoot pic doesn't make it real. Calling it "blurry" even though it's in perfect focus doesn't make you any less wrong. |
| Loup Garou
User ID: 83270917 United States05/23/2022 02:49 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another work for the marks. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83101166 Keep chasing your tails while they continue to launder billions of your generational wealth. If the US weren’t so infested by so many parasites the real, legal population would have been living like princes and princesses as the Saudis do. The truth is such a sad, sad thing. Just because YOU don’t believe in the Rougarou; or the Loup Garou, don’t make you safe; No ! The Constitution is a blend of 'moral certitude' -- which is one of the reasons that criminals are determined to be rid of it and We the People must be even more determined to defend it. "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine The only thing the Illuminati fears is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord gives us more time! The End is near and time is short! A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. ~Proverbs 18:2 For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle" - James Keller Checkd, Keked, and Rekt! #Kids2 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83318003 Canada05/23/2022 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall. Come on Astro. You know that if you know the angle of the sun you can estimate height from the shadows. Could you try it using the original info? |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall. Come on Astro. You know that if you know the angle of the sun you can estimate height from the shadows. Could you try it using the original info? I already did. If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall. Now let's do some math based on the actual image, not the CGI render made by some random YouTuber. We have a lot of useful data here: Scaled pixel width: 2.87 meters Incidence angle: 42.23° [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] So the pixel scale is about 2.87 meters per pixel, the sun angle is 42.23 degrees from zenith or 47.77 degrees from the horizon. The shadow length is about 6.4 pixels at best for the middle and rightmost "tower" or 18.368 meters long. The height of the "tower" is tan(47.77 degrees)*18.368 meters = 20 meters. That is orders of magnitude smaller than the 4.8 km quoted in sensational articles like this: [link to www.firstpost.com (secure)] Last Edited by Astromut on 05/23/2022 02:54 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70672621 United Kingdom05/23/2022 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76605887 United States05/23/2022 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mars is a mere plasma orb in the sky. The Earth is flat and stationary… Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77614436 What are your thoughts on the moon? Plasma too? Genuinely want to know as I’ve seen theories on this, but they are few. There aren’t many theories because both are documented to be rocky planetary bodies. We have sent many to the moon to walk on it and return material here to earth, and we have many probes operating today on Mars. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83386842 United Kingdom05/23/2022 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70672621 United Kingdom05/23/2022 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 meters tall, in a row. on the satellite imagery. this should wake everyone up. either humans have been to mars or some other lifeform has. these certainly are not natural formations. Astro, can you tell us what the clusters of "lights" are in the craters on the greyscale satellite image? |
| luisaywhitehat
User ID: 83250337  Germany05/23/2022 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 05/23/2022 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 meters is an upper limit. The resolution of the image itself is scarcely better than 3 meters. They're also not even, the left one is shorter. They are not the ridiculous tall pointy towers the YouTuber faked in CGI. Last Edited by Astromut on 05/23/2022 03:01 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70672621 United Kingdom05/23/2022 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 meters is an upper limit. The resolution of the image itself is scarcely better than 3 meters. They're also not even, the left one is shorter. They are not the ridiculous tall pointy towers the YouTuber faked in CGI. When you saw this image, i'm sure you saw it back in 2019... what did it make you think? did it change your outlook on life on mars? |
| ElephantInTheRoom
User ID: 80823226 United States05/23/2022 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 20 meters is an upper limit. The resolution of the image itself is scarcely better than 3 meters. They're also not even, the left one is shorter. They are not the ridiculous tall pointy towers the YouTuber faked in CGI. Wouldn't it be funny if it were the tops of ancient sky scrapers basically sunk into the sand over the millennia? Or it could just be a geological formation that's boring. :) the mystery is what intrigues us all. TheElephantInTheRoom |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70672621 United Kingdom05/23/2022 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Sundecoder
(OP) User ID: 56736532 Germany05/23/2022 03:06 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it's censored, why can I still find the image no problem? Quoting: Astromut [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] [link to asimov.msss.com (secure)] Not sure where the 3d isometric image comes from, but this other site lists the same image as a CGI representation of what some unnamed youtuber thinks the towers look like... "The three mysterious towers discovered on the Martian surface is been represented using Computer Generated Imagery (CGI)YOUTUBE SCRENSHOT" [link to www.ibtimes.co.in (secure)] Found the YouTuber responsible. Posted 6 years ago on YouTube. He openly admits this is CGI he made himself based on how he interprets the image. Translated from spanish in google: "4:03 we have prepared a 3-d animation 4:05 so that you understand more or less how 4:10 are these mounds an animation that 4:12 you are watching right now watch 4:15 that we interpret that they have 4:18 that shape" So no, the 3d image doesn't come from NASA, it comes from this random youtuber who is assuming they're that tall. Thanks Astro, your input is apreciated, like always! Believe Nothing - Question Everything |
