| Users Online Now: 2,359 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,422,778 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,375,675 | Threads Today: 952 | Posts Today: 16,938 |
| 10:10 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,359 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,422,778 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,375,675 | Threads Today: 952 | Posts Today: 16,938 |
| 10:10 PM | ||
VIDEO: "Destroying Flat Earth Without Using Science" (in Less Than 6 Minutes) | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83408015 05/24/2022 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The image that you see inverts... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72709349 What does this mean? I don't understand what you are saying... Here you go. [link to imgur.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83406101  Australia05/24/2022 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83408015 05/24/2022 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Professor dave is a joke lol. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799472 I have a video of someone thats actually knowledgeable who ends up contacting one of the worlds leading astrophysicists. Then through a series of questions and examples, she herself cant explain the topics he talks about with her. You can tell as she thinks about it, she is even realizing it doesnt make sense. You can tell from her voice shes internally struggling with the topics because its making her question what she thinks she knows. Yeah. Mark Knight of the WaykiWayki channel. He tied that astrophysics "perfesser" up in knots. Her cog dis was exploding!  I saw this. After he made a fool of her she tried to get him to sign a non disclosure agreement etc. He literally proved that these so called physicists and astrology experts are total hecklers and frauds. It was beautiful to behold. She wasn't some nobody either. She was world "renowned ". |
New Atlantis
 User ID: 70799828  United States05/28/2022 05:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| A Healer User ID: 83322341  United Kingdom05/28/2022 05:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83404124 United Kingdom05/28/2022 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Professor dave is a joke lol. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799472 I have a video of someone thats actually knowledgeable who ends up contacting one of the worlds leading astrophysicists. Then through a series of questions and examples, she herself cant explain the topics he talks about with her. You can tell as she thinks about it, she is even realizing it doesnt make sense. You can tell from her voice shes internally struggling with the topics because its making her question what she thinks she knows. Yeah. Mark Knight of the WaykiWayki channel. He tied that astrophysics "perfesser" up in knots. Her cog dis was exploding! I saw this. After he made a fool of her she tried to get him to sign a non disclosure agreement etc. He literally proved that these so called physicists and astrology experts are total hecklers and frauds. It was beautiful to behold. She wasn't some nobody either. She was world "renowned ". That video is massively shadow banned to the point you can't find it via YouTube, you have to do a Google video search: OOF! She must have been RAGING FOR DAYS after that. It's over for the globe Earth deception. It lasted at least 70 years, but it's over. Get on the right side of the river already, space cadets. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83404124 United Kingdom05/28/2022 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| S.O.S.
User ID: 82507630 United States05/28/2022 05:37 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave"Professor" Dave LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL Govt (CIA/Army/Navy/KGB) docs in “Government Documents Admit Flat Earth” [link to youtu.be (secure)] Globbers look up in trying to prove the world is a globe. They should be looking down at the Earth they stand on. How stars work in the FE model: [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83404124 United Kingdom05/28/2022 05:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82094356 United States05/28/2022 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mother Maggie
User ID: 83417648 United States05/28/2022 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the pressure of cold space makes hot things round.. end of story.. thats all you need once again. I have destroyed flat earth in the 10 sec it took me to write this Last Edited by Mother Maggie on 05/28/2022 05:46 PM Yea though I walk thru the valley of gross inability to recognize the absurd ..lies...propaganda and dark shits... I will fear it all NOT.. for THOU ART WITH ME. AND JESUS SAID ON THE CROSS.. FORGIVE THEM FATHER.. THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83458455 United Kingdom05/28/2022 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? Answer just one question? : Using science, Can an open atmosphere be next to a vacuum without a closed environment? As in atmosphere, hypothetical door, open door vacuum! |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? Answer just one question? : Using science, Can an open atmosphere be next to a vacuum without a closed environment? As in atmosphere, hypothetical door, open door vacuum! Around a mass of sufficient size? Yes. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79799033 United States05/28/2022 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? That alone doesn’t necessarily make him wrong, but he is wrong. |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? That alone doesn’t necessarily make him wrong, but he is wrong. Then it should be easy for you to debunk the claims that he made in that video. Well? Get to it. Chop chop. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77118299 United States05/28/2022 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: bob1810 "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? That alone doesn’t necessarily make him wrong, but he is wrong. Then it should be easy for you to debunk the claims that he made in that video. Well? Get to it. Chop chop. Gonna debunk that the ocean is level? That's 101 stuff and has been for years and NOTHING from ANYONE. Stop resisting the truth like some 9/11 official story idiot in 2002. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77118299 United States05/28/2022 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: bob1810 "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? Answer just one question? : Using science, Can an open atmosphere be next to a vacuum without a closed environment? As in atmosphere, hypothetical door, open door vacuum! Around a mass of sufficient size? Yes. When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then it should be easy for you to debunk the claims that he made in that video. Well? Get to it. Chop chop. Gonna debunk that the ocean is level? That's 101 stuff and has been for years and NOTHING from ANYONE. Stop resisting the truth like some 9/11 official story idiot in 2002. It is level, meaning the surface is equidistant from the center mass of the Earth. |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Answer just one question? : Using science, Can an open atmosphere be next to a vacuum without a closed environment? As in atmosphere, hypothetical door, open door vacuum! Around a mass of sufficient size? Yes. When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. Yep. We call it the Earth. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77708126 Australia05/28/2022 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Midnight Oil
User ID: 71761145 United States05/28/2022 06:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79799033 United States05/28/2022 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033 That alone doesn’t necessarily make him wrong, but he is wrong. Then it should be easy for you to debunk the claims that he made in that video. Well? Get to it. Chop chop. Gonna debunk that the ocean is level? That's 101 stuff and has been for years and NOTHING from ANYONE. Stop resisting the truth like some 9/11 official story idiot in 2002. It is level, meaning the surface is equidistant from the center mass of the Earth. No, you are reinventing what level means. Level means FLAT. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78373075  Canada05/28/2022 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Easy way to tell that the earth is not a globe: Any video talking about flat earth has a 'covid like' warning fact check thing from youtube on the video.. they wouldnt be trying this hard to fact check if flat earth was silly nonsense and completely not based in reality. it's pretty transparent censorship btw, check out David Weiss interviews channel for some real good stuff! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83458455 United Kingdom05/28/2022 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LCS Answer just one question? : Using science, Can an open atmosphere be next to a vacuum without a closed environment? As in atmosphere, hypothetical door, open door vacuum! Around a mass of sufficient size? Yes. When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. Yep. We call it the Earth. Question two: If we are rotating at 1,035 mph. Orbiting around the sun at 66,600 mph , That sun orbiting the milky way galaxy at 550,000 mph. Then the milky way galaxy orbiting the centre of the universe at 650,000,000 . All without parallax. As in the star's are in the same place as they were 1,000 years ago - 5,000 years ago - and so on. The night sky is a cosmic clock. With very few people who can tell the True/Time.. Surprisingly if the universe is all moving away from each other from a central point,you wouldn't be able to see any of the same star's after a short time, so what we are told is impossible. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75428284 United States05/28/2022 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Professor" Dave is well known within the FE community. He behaves like an arrogant prick. Nobody wants to debate him because of his arrogant condescending attitude. Check the video with David Weiss, decide for yourself if you want to debate a real arrogant self deluded prick who did not even finish his studies... Being an arrogant prick doesn't make him wrong though, does it? i am not convinced either way - flat or globe - so many things just do not make sense using both models - but trying to learn anything from an “arrogant prick” asshole know it all who thinks he is above all is near impossible - i can’t listen to “professor” dave without cringing |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/28/2022 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. Yep. We call it the Earth. Question two: If we are rotating at 1,035 mph. Orbiting around the sun at 66,600 mph , That sun orbiting the milky way galaxy at 550,000 mph. Then the milky way galaxy orbiting the centre of the universe at 650,000,000 . All without parallax. As in the star's are in the same place as they were 1,000 years ago - 5,000 years ago - and so on. The night sky is a cosmic clock. With very few people who can tell the True/Time.. Surprisingly if the universe is all moving away from each other from a central point,you wouldn't be able to see any of the same star's after a short time, so what we are told is impossible. It has changed. That's why Polaris is the north star when it was previously Thuban. Now if your question is why hasn't it changed more, then the issue is that you don't comprehend the distances we are talking about. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78598720 United States05/28/2022 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. Yep. We call it the Earth. Question two: If we are rotating at 1,035 mph. Orbiting around the sun at 66,600 mph , That sun orbiting the milky way galaxy at 550,000 mph. Then the milky way galaxy orbiting the centre of the universe at 650,000,000 . All without parallax. As in the star's are in the same place as they were 1,000 years ago - 5,000 years ago - and so on. The night sky is a cosmic clock. With very few people who can tell the True/Time.. Surprisingly if the universe is all moving away from each other from a central point,you wouldn't be able to see any of the same star's after a short time, so what we are told is impossible. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78598720 United States05/28/2022 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77118299 When was this proven via a physical experiment? Never. So your talking shite, babydoll. Yep. We call it the Earth. Question two: If we are rotating at 1,035 mph. Orbiting around the sun at 66,600 mph , That sun orbiting the milky way galaxy at 550,000 mph. Then the milky way galaxy orbiting the centre of the universe at 650,000,000 . All without parallax. As in the star's are in the same place as they were 1,000 years ago - 5,000 years ago - and so on. The night sky is a cosmic clock. With very few people who can tell the True/Time.. Surprisingly if the universe is all moving away from each other from a central point,you wouldn't be able to see any of the same star's after a short time, so what we are told is impossible. It has changed. That's why Polaris is the north star when it was previously Thuban. Now if your question is why hasn't it changed more, then the issue is that you don't comprehend the distances we are talking about. You observed this personally, did you? You must be old, I thought I smelled piss. |
| Captain Cosmos
User ID: 80185305 United States05/29/2022 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Question two: If we are rotating at 1,035 mph. Orbiting around the sun at 66,600 mph , That sun orbiting the milky way galaxy at 550,000 mph. Then the milky way galaxy orbiting the centre of the universe at 650,000,000 . All without parallax. As in the star's are in the same place as they were 1,000 years ago - 5,000 years ago - and so on. The night sky is a cosmic clock. With very few people who can tell the True/Time.. Surprisingly if the universe is all moving away from each other from a central point,you wouldn't be able to see any of the same star's after a short time, so what we are told is impossible. It has changed. That's why Polaris is the north star when it was previously Thuban. Now if your question is why hasn't it changed more, then the issue is that you don't comprehend the distances we are talking about. You observed this personally, did you? You must be old, I thought I smelled piss. You see, the ancient astronomers made star charts that we can compare with our modern observations. Next, do you want to discuss how the zodiac signs that people think they were born under are no longer valid because of precession? [link to www.space.com (secure)] |
