| Users Online Now: 1,685 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 593,359 | |
| Pageviews Today: 932,328 | Threads Today: 373 | Posts Today: 5,143 |
| 10:15 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,685 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 593,359 | |
| Pageviews Today: 932,328 | Threads Today: 373 | Posts Today: 5,143 |
| 10:15 AM | ||
HUGE! The Wall Street Journal TURNS ON Clinton! She did it, she is guilty | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83419535  United States05/25/2022 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE I quoted for you the actual law now you do the same for me. For the entire Trump presidency we were told that he colluded with the Russians and that such collusion was against federal statues. Prove to me that collusion isn't against the law, post a link to any decision by any court that says collusion is legal under US law. I know that you will refuse to do so and I expect that you will instead of having a reasoned discussion with me resort to your standard practice of acting like a troll or a shill from here on out The RICO act is the government's best tool for going after a conspiracy this huge, everyone in the Obama administration was involved in this scheme to get Trump off the ballot and to remove him from office after he was sworn in. Obama knew, Biden knew, Clinton knew, Comey knew, Mueller knew, Hillary's campaign knew, Podesta knew, everyone involved in the FISA court lies knew they were lying to the FISA court judge, Fusion GPS knew, and because they coordinated their efforts in any fashion is was a huge conspiracy to destroy a sitting president before and after he was elected. Perhaps the only real question I have for you specifically is why do you support what the Democrats and republicans did to Trump, what is your real motivation in your constant spamming of these threads that seek to understand what really happened? I don't expect a honest answer from you to that question either....  You did not link any FEDERAL STATUTE from a ".gov" website with the word COLLUSION, you quoted WKIPEDIA Qtard :rere23: Actually I did, at the bottom of that particular wikipedia page is the link to the actual FEDERAL STATUTE along with a number of links that are relevant to this discussion of the RICO statute. That you are too ignorant to read beyond the first link is no concern of mine, it is there if I need it or if anyone else wants to read the ACTUAL FEDERAL STATUTE. You attempting to browbeat me into submission with insults isn't going to end well for you I can and will cover any information I require to make my case. Again nowhere in either of those links is the word COLLUSION my little sock puppet friend which is why "THEY" specifically chose the word COLLUSION instead of conspiracy when the SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was authorized The words in any legal proceeding matter because that 8s the CRIMINAL CHARGE which is exactly why the word TREASON was not chosen because there is a FEDERAL STATUTE that defines TREASON Now please provide the ".gov" link to the FEDERAL STATUTE that defines the bogus crime "COLLUSION" prior to 2018 Then when you fail, try to find any STATE STATUTE with the w9rd COLLUSION, and it's definition  Just how stupid are you? You asked for a link to the FEDERAL RICO STATUTES and now you want some sort of state law that defines what collusion is? I swear your whole purpose here is to support Hillary and everyone involved in the conspiracy to stop Trump instead of any sort of justice. Are you really that big of a Clintonista that you have to disrupt anything that has to do with how they tried to destroy the first president in history that wasn’t a member of the political elites in this century. Get a hold of yourself, if you have any sort of respect for the US constitution and these country or it’s citizens, you would not be actively supporting what they did to Trump by trying to derail any discussion of what happened and how they conspired in a textbook case of conspiracy under the RICO act. Seth Rich’s murder is enough to make what they did a case for RICO, how they conspired to lie under oath is enough to make this a case for RICO, the abuse of power by Obama and Biden is enough to make the case for RICO. But you want some legal definition of collusion spelled out to you because you’re too dumb to realize this is far above the case of collusion, it’s a massive government conspiracy worse than anything in this country’s history. |
FlockOfSmeagols
 User ID: 78148665 United States05/25/2022 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80365094 United States05/25/2022 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83417165 United States05/25/2022 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83417165 You did not link any FEDERAL STATUTE from a ".gov" website with the word COLLUSION, you quoted WKIPEDIA Qtard :rere23: Actually I did, at the bottom of that particular wikipedia page is the link to the actual FEDERAL STATUTE along with a number of links that are relevant to this discussion of the RICO statute. That you are too ignorant to read beyond the first link is no concern of mine, it is there if I need it or if anyone else wants to read the ACTUAL FEDERAL STATUTE. You attempting to browbeat me into submission with insults isn't going to end well for you I can and will cover any information I require to make my case. Again nowhere in either of those links is the word COLLUSION my little sock puppet friend which is why "THEY" specifically chose the word COLLUSION instead of conspiracy when the SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was authorized The words in any legal proceeding matter because that 8s the CRIMINAL CHARGE which is exactly why the word TREASON was not chosen because there is a FEDERAL STATUTE that defines TREASON Now please provide the ".gov" link to the FEDERAL STATUTE that defines the bogus crime "COLLUSION" prior to 2018 Then when you fail, try to find any STATE STATUTE with the w9rd COLLUSION, and it's definition Just how stupid are you? You asked for a link to the FEDERAL RICO STATUTES and now you want some sort of state law that defines what collusion is? I swear your whole purpose here is to support Hillary and everyone involved in the conspiracy to stop Trump instead of any sort of justice. Are you really that big of a Clintonista that you have to disrupt anything that has to do with how they tried to destroy the first president in history that wasn’t a member of the political elites in this century. Get a hold of yourself, if you have any sort of respect for the US constitution and these country or it’s citizens, you would not be actively supporting what they did to Trump by trying to derail any discussion of what happened and how they conspired in a textbook case of conspiracy under the RICO act. Seth Rich’s murder is enough to make what they did a case for RICO, how they conspired to lie under oath is enough to make this a case for RICO, the abuse of power by Obama and Biden is enough to make the case for RICO. But you want some legal definition of collusion spelled out to you because you’re too dumb to realize this is far above the case of collusion, it’s a massive government conspiracy worse than anything in this country’s history. For The Record: Notice GLP, that these are the same excuses that were used against me here back in 2017, when I asked for a link to any ".gov" website that has any federal criminal statute with the word "COLLUSION" in the penal code to which these same sock puppets still cannot provide a link I got all day |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80259670  Canada05/25/2022 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is small potatoes compared to what she is guilty of. Seriously, get real. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71031227 You mean, like her getting rid of 100+ people who stood in her way one way or the other? Even that is unfortunately just scraping the surface. Like the kids? Like podes ta? |
| MrCoolone
User ID: 33106931 United States05/25/2022 12:51 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE Actually I did, at the bottom of that particular wikipedia page is the link to the actual FEDERAL STATUTE along with a number of links that are relevant to this discussion of the RICO statute. That you are too ignorant to read beyond the first link is no concern of mine, it is there if I need it or if anyone else wants to read the ACTUAL FEDERAL STATUTE. You attempting to browbeat me into submission with insults isn't going to end well for you I can and will cover any information I require to make my case. Again nowhere in either of those links is the word COLLUSION my little sock puppet friend which is why "THEY" specifically chose the word COLLUSION instead of conspiracy when the SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was authorized The words in any legal proceeding matter because that 8s the CRIMINAL CHARGE which is exactly why the word TREASON was not chosen because there is a FEDERAL STATUTE that defines TREASON Now please provide the ".gov" link to the FEDERAL STATUTE that defines the bogus crime "COLLUSION" prior to 2018 Then when you fail, try to find any STATE STATUTE with the w9rd COLLUSION, and it's definition Just how stupid are you? You asked for a link to the FEDERAL RICO STATUTES and now you want some sort of state law that defines what collusion is? I swear your whole purpose here is to support Hillary and everyone involved in the conspiracy to stop Trump instead of any sort of justice. Are you really that big of a Clintonista that you have to disrupt anything that has to do with how they tried to destroy the first president in history that wasn’t a member of the political elites in this century. Get a hold of yourself, if you have any sort of respect for the US constitution and these country or it’s citizens, you would not be actively supporting what they did to Trump by trying to derail any discussion of what happened and how they conspired in a textbook case of conspiracy under the RICO act. Seth Rich’s murder is enough to make what they did a case for RICO, how they conspired to lie under oath is enough to make this a case for RICO, the abuse of power by Obama and Biden is enough to make the case for RICO. But you want some legal definition of collusion spelled out to you because you’re too dumb to realize this is far above the case of collusion, it’s a massive government conspiracy worse than anything in this country’s history. For The Record: Notice GLP, that these are the same excuses that were used against me here back in 2017, when I asked for a link to any ".gov" website that has any federal criminal statute with the word "COLLUSION" in the penal code to which these same sock puppets still cannot provide a link I got all day Poof!!! Find your own link, dumb-ass Poof!!! You were a dumb-ass in 2017 and your still a dumb-ass Poof!!! You must be a Commy Demo Rat, or you are purposely confused dumb-ass because you accuse Durham, Trump for what Crooked Hillary and others are doing. And if you want to ask a question, (KISS) Keep it simple stupid, Nobody reads your links to other absurd post, nobody reads your long drawn out statements, if you have a question, ask it (KISS) without pictures, image and imogies. Poof!!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83417165 United States05/25/2022 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83417165 Again nowhere in either of those links is the word COLLUSION my little sock puppet friend which is why "THEY" specifically chose the word COLLUSION instead of conspiracy when the SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was authorized The words in any legal proceeding matter because that 8s the CRIMINAL CHARGE which is exactly why the word TREASON was not chosen because there is a FEDERAL STATUTE that defines TREASON Now please provide the ".gov" link to the FEDERAL STATUTE that defines the bogus crime "COLLUSION" prior to 2018 Then when you fail, try to find any STATE STATUTE with the w9rd COLLUSION, and it's definition Just how stupid are you? You asked for a link to the FEDERAL RICO STATUTES and now you want some sort of state law that defines what collusion is? I swear your whole purpose here is to support Hillary and everyone involved in the conspiracy to stop Trump instead of any sort of justice. Are you really that big of a Clintonista that you have to disrupt anything that has to do with how they tried to destroy the first president in history that wasn’t a member of the political elites in this century. Get a hold of yourself, if you have any sort of respect for the US constitution and these country or it’s citizens, you would not be actively supporting what they did to Trump by trying to derail any discussion of what happened and how they conspired in a textbook case of conspiracy under the RICO act. Seth Rich’s murder is enough to make what they did a case for RICO, how they conspired to lie under oath is enough to make this a case for RICO, the abuse of power by Obama and Biden is enough to make the case for RICO. But you want some legal definition of collusion spelled out to you because you’re too dumb to realize this is far above the case of collusion, it’s a massive government conspiracy worse than anything in this country’s history. For The Record: Notice GLP, that these are the same excuses that were used against me here back in 2017, when I asked for a link to any ".gov" website that has any federal criminal statute with the word "COLLUSION" in the penal code to which these same sock puppets still cannot provide a link I got all day Poof!!! Find your own link, dumb-ass Poof!!! You were a dumb-ass in 2017 and your still a dumb-ass Poof!!! You must be a Commy Demo Rat, or you are purposely confused dumb-ass because you accuse Durham, Trump for what Crooked Hillary and others are doing. And if you want to ask a question, (KISS) Keep it simple stupid, Nobody reads your links to other absurd post, nobody reads your long drawn out statements, if you have a question, ask it (KISS) without pictures, image and imogies. Poof!!!  You mean like how I questioned this scripted reality back in 2018, after Trump greenlighted his own DOJ to authorize FEDERAL AGENTS, to partner with DEMOCRAT GOVERNORS, to red flag conservatives in SANCTUARY CITIES, instead of deporting the illegals in those SANCTUARY CITIES, I asked exactly who is the enemy again? Or how about when I wrote in 2017 that Obama's DEEP STATE shadow government was using the Ukraine Playbook to steal the the midterms in 2018 compelling me to publish another article asking if Trump was controlled opposition when I could see that the GLOBALISTS were already angling to do the same while Trump pretended to be oblivious again in 2020 The DNC was on the verge of extinction after the 2016 election yet these Q tards still can't see how stealing the 2018 midterms would've been damn near impossible had Trump counter punched back by demanding that AG Sessions hire a SPECIAL DA to investigate Venezuelan collusion and Israeli collusion and Chinese collusion involving the Clinton Campaign and DNC to the hundreds of SANCTUARY CITY MAYORS that were never drained from the swamp in handcuffs by that deportation force that was never going to happen Trump instead allowed the IRS Tea Party Targeting Scandal to be covered up and then allowed Lois Lerner to escape to Israel with her full pension while you Q tards keep trying to have it both ways Then Trump re-endorsed the same Senator Graham for re-election again instead of demanding a Sheriff issue an arrest warrant for conspiring with Obama to weaponize the IRS against the Tea Party Notice GLP that these are the same Q tards that also blame the conservative voters in blue states for not voting harder even though they're still surrounded by the thousands of sanctuary city mayors that were never drained from the swamp in handcuffs This CATCH 22 HYPOCRISY is the crux of the entire ORANGE TROJAN HORSE PSY-OP NARRATIVE so these Q tards can have it both ways to intentionally derail the debate from that DEPORTATION FORCE that never happened with citizens still surrounded by the millions of illegal aliens that are used to dilute our electoral power Millions of citizens remain silenced because of you Q tards blaming the victims for Trump's orchestrated failures by design like when Trump allowed the 2018 midterms to be stolen on purpose so he had an excuse for the Qtards to point at again! You geniuses fall for it every single time, without ever questioning the tactical advantage to any of this scripted 2016 RUSSIA-GATE bat soup bull shit, compared to the 2018 midterms being stolen, that put this Republic into checkmate, after Pelosi hijacked the CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT command structure, which could've allowed the opportunity to overturn the 2020 election! Keep trying to have it both ways saying that the 2020 election was rigged yet can't see your hypocrisy regarding how Trump was allowed to win in 2016 [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]  |
| MrCoolone
User ID: 33106931 United States05/25/2022 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83417165 United States05/25/2022 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83417165 Again nowhere in either of those links is the word COLLUSION my little sock puppet friend which is why "THEY" specifically chose the word COLLUSION instead of conspiracy when the SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was authorized The words in any legal proceeding matter because that 8s the CRIMINAL CHARGE which is exactly why the word TREASON was not chosen because there is a FEDERAL STATUTE that defines TREASON Now please provide the ".gov" link to the FEDERAL STATUTE that defines the bogus crime "COLLUSION" prior to 2018 Then when you fail, try to find any STATE STATUTE with the w9rd COLLUSION, and it's definition Just how stupid are you? You asked for a link to the FEDERAL RICO STATUTES and now you want some sort of state law that defines what collusion is? I swear your whole purpose here is to support Hillary and everyone involved in the conspiracy to stop Trump instead of any sort of justice. Are you really that big of a Clintonista that you have to disrupt anything that has to do with how they tried to destroy the first president in history that wasn’t a member of the political elites in this century. Get a hold of yourself, if you have any sort of respect for the US constitution and these country or it’s citizens, you would not be actively supporting what they did to Trump by trying to derail any discussion of what happened and how they conspired in a textbook case of conspiracy under the RICO act. Seth Rich’s murder is enough to make what they did a case for RICO, how they conspired to lie under oath is enough to make this a case for RICO, the abuse of power by Obama and Biden is enough to make the case for RICO. But you want some legal definition of collusion spelled out to you because you’re too dumb to realize this is far above the case of collusion, it’s a massive government conspiracy worse than anything in this country’s history. For The Record: Notice GLP, that these are the same excuses that were used against me here back in 2017, when I asked for a link to any ".gov" website that has any federal criminal statute with the word "COLLUSION" in the penal code to which these same sock puppets still cannot provide a link I got all day Poof!!! Find your own link, dumb-ass Poof!!! You were a dumb-ass in 2017 and your still a dumb-ass Poof!!! You must be a Commy Demo Rat, or you are purposely confused dumb-ass because you accuse Durham, Trump for what Crooked Hillary and others are doing. And if you want to ask a question, (KISS) Keep it simple stupid, Nobody reads your links to other absurd post, nobody reads your long drawn out statements, if you have a question, ask it (KISS) without pictures, image and imogies. Poof!!! Please cite any link where Durham has said the name Seth Rich |
| MrCoolone
User ID: 33106931 United States05/25/2022 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83417165 United States05/25/2022 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump told us if Biden won the stock market would crash and we'd be paying $5 for gas. Quoting: MrCoolone Trump was right! Again. Translation:The globalists have finally milked and deflated every ounce of equity from the dollar for this orchestrated demolition of our children's grandchildren's children's future to usher in the final phase of this COMMUNIST REVOLUTION that historians have already named the GREAT RESET It doesnt take a bankruptcy degree from the Wharton School Of Business to know inflation was coming after Trump's FED CHAIR was allowed to use the REPO MARKET in November 2019 to print money out of thin air just like Obama to avert another 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse by bailing out Deutsche Bank before they abandon the dollar for the gold backed Russian Ruble Watch GLP how this shill will try to have it both ways pretending like it wasn't Trump's fault yet won't concede that Trump covered it up so COVID could be used as the scapegoat after alerting NATO and Israel to the COVID outbreak in November 2019 but not the American people Trump has been the leader of the Republican GOP for over half a decade and he couldn't even drain the swamp from his own party but you go ahead and keep bending over while trusting the plan.... From September 2019 Thread: The Fed to Dump $75 Billion PER DAY Into Repo Market Until Oct. 10 From October 2019 Thread: FED BAILED OUT FAILING GERMAN DEUTSCHE BANK $354 BILLION From November 2019 Thread: MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Israeli TV confirms that the US alerted Israel, NATO to disease outbreak in China in November (Page 3) From December 2019 Thread: DRAIN THE SWAMP? Jarad, ivanka, Kellyanne and Trump’s Fed Chairman Powell attend lavish party at Bezos’ $23 million home https://twitter.com/_/status/1528895958792151040  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83309808 United States05/25/2022 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rumor has it she had a privet server in her closet @ her home when she was sec of State. Quoting: Garufal Wonder what goodies can be found on THAT. Fact. In the towel closet. Source - [link to www.wsj.com (secure)] |
| Jenny222
User ID: 78124659 Canada05/25/2022 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cracks are forming. I think the globalist are running out of money and slowly players are playing the middle and or will reverse if it looks like they’re going to lose. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83407380 Nah, cracks are not forming. Strzok, Page, Baker, Sussman could all do a couple years. And that's it. And they will all get golden parachutes for being loyal party soldiers. Because literally, FBI and CIA do not give a flying turd about corruption in their own ranks. Not one lonely turd. Trey Gowdy exposed there lies when he was in the DOJ and nothing happened then and nothing will now. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83419535 United States05/25/2022 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey V errr or whatever you call yourself these day... All I have to do to get you to shut up is prove that the term “collusion” is in any federal law or statute? And you will admit defeat? I wish I could trust you to be a man of your word or at least honor your own requests... First let’s define collusion. Collusion: Collusion is when two or more parties secretly agree to defraud a third-party of their rights or accomplish an illegal purpose. By its very definition collusion is a conspiracy between to or more parties to defraud anyone or commit an illegal act. Do you agree with that definition? I am hiding the source for now until you admit that is what collusion means in the legal sense. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121  Netherlands05/25/2022 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE Here's your link.... [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Under the law, the meaning of racketeering activity is set out at 18 U.S.C. § 1961. As currently amended it includes: Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, extortion, arson, robbery, bribery, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act); Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and many other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18); Embezzlement of union funds; Bankruptcy fraud or securities fraud; Drug trafficking; long-term and elaborate drug networks can also be prosecuted using the Continuing Criminal Enterprise Statute; Criminal copyright infringement; Money laundering and related offenses; Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain); Acts of terrorism. RICO covers collusion because a criminal conspiracy was involved to lie to federal officials at the FBI to get them to illegally wiretap the presidential campaign offices of Donald Trump using a court solely and specifically set up to authorize surveillance of foreign terrorist operating inside the United States. There is proof that this was an actual conspiracy with those involved communicating directly with the Clinton Campaign and the FBI via text messages and emails and that money was paid through Clinton lawyers by the Clinton campaign to craft the Steele dossier that was used to kick start this whole episode. Nice try again my little sock puppet friend but the LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was specifically created for the SPECIAL COUNSEL using the word COLLUSION instead of COMSPIRACY for that exact reason otherwise they would've just used that actual word CONSPIRACY because it is in the FEDERAL STATUTE!  I quoted for you the actual law now you do the same for me. For the entire Trump presidency we were told that he colluded with the Russians and that such collusion was against federal statues. Prove to me that collusion isn't against the law, post a link to any decision by any court that says collusion is legal under US law. I know that you will refuse to do so and I expect that you will instead of having a reasoned discussion with me resort to your standard practice of acting like a troll or a shill from here on out The RICO act is the government's best tool for going after a conspiracy this huge, everyone in the Obama administration was involved in this scheme to get Trump off the ballot and to remove him from office after he was sworn in. Obama knew, Biden knew, Clinton knew, Comey knew, Mueller knew, Hillary's campaign knew, Podesta knew, everyone involved in the FISA court lies knew they were lying to the FISA court judge, Fusion GPS knew, and because they coordinated their efforts in any fashion is was a huge conspiracy to destroy a sitting president before and after he was elected. Perhaps the only real question I have for you specifically is why do you support what the Democrats and republicans did to Trump, what is your real motivation in your constant spamming of these threads that seek to understand what really happened? I don't expect a honest answer from you to that question either.... You did not link any FEDERAL STATUTE from a ".gov" website with the word COLLUSION, you quoted WKIPEDIA Qtard :rere23 5 fucking years of hate Trump and when Trump is proven right you are right there stirring the shit. You are a mental case, motherfucker, JD. I bet you go to church then go home and fuck your kids. You ignorant junkie bitch. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121 Netherlands05/25/2022 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cracks are forming. I think the globalist are running out of money and slowly players are playing the middle and or will reverse if it looks like they’re going to lose. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83407380 Nah, cracks are not forming. Strzok, Page, Baker, Sussman could all do a couple years. And that's it. And they will all get golden parachutes for being loyal party soldiers. Because literally, FBI and CIA do not give a flying turd about corruption in their own ranks. Not one lonely turd. Trey Gowdy exposed there lies when he was in the DOJ and nothing happened then and nothing will now. Back then the globalist had the petro dollar. Now these motherfucker are going broke, and can't even supply baby formula to mothers. No way to run the country when you need chain link fences and national guard to protect the claim you are running things. |
| Alpacalips
User ID: 81794225 United States05/25/2022 01:33 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121 Netherlands05/25/2022 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey V errr or whatever you call yourself these day... Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE All I have to do to get you to shut up is prove that the term “collusion” is in any federal law or statute? And you will admit defeat? I wish I could trust you to be a man of your word or at least honor your own requests... First let’s define collusion. Collusion: Collusion is when two or more parties secretly agree to defraud a third-party of their rights or accomplish an illegal purpose. By its very definition collusion is a conspiracy between to or more parties to defraud anyone or commit an illegal act. Do you agree with that definition? I am hiding the source for now until you admit that is what collusion means in the legal sense. No use arguing with these Biden bot asshole. Read an actual attorney like Techno_Fog. More on Special Counsel John Durham’s prosecution of Michael Sussmann: Here are the transcript excerpts from Robby Mook admitting the Alfa Bank allegations - and the idea to spread them to the media - made it all the way up to Hillary Clinton. [link to technofog.substack.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121 Netherlands05/25/2022 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83419535 United States05/25/2022 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the way, I got the definition of “collusion” from Cornell law School, easily one of the finest Law Schools in the county. [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Maybe it doesn’t have.gov behind it but it’s legal reference website is actually better than anything the government has. |
| LobsterJ
User ID: 81886175 United States05/25/2022 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Joe's big supporters are the prisons and police, so as a politician/gang, he has what it takes to go after an international criminal like Hillary. I'm laughing at Democrats. Joe Biden is like a gangster straight out of Dick Tracy, sweet old Grandpa Joe. They stole an election to put the biggest right wing fascist criminal in US history in office and now he's even turning the screws on dearest Hillary. Yeah, Joe is just a front man maybe, but if so, he's a front man for the meanest toughest criminals in the US. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121 Netherlands05/25/2022 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rumor has it she had a privet server in her closet @ her home when she was sec of State. Quoting: Garufal Wonder what goodies can be found on THAT. Fact. In the towel closet. Source - [link to www.wsj.com (secure)] Wait until Uranium One deal is revisited after fucking 5 years of hate Russia and now the Ukraine hysteria. Anyone over twenty-five give a shits about ancient history in the Obama era? These mfs were up to their ass selling America out to destroy America and make hundreds of millions doing so. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77471121 Netherlands05/25/2022 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the way, I got the definition of “collusion” from Cornell law School, easily one of the finest Law Schools in the county. Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Maybe it doesn’t have.gov behind it but it’s legal reference website is actually better than anything the government has. Go to the source. Don't argue with non attorneys and often high school drop out about the law. No name, no contact information, no responsibility for anything they post. |
| MrCoolone
User ID: 33106931 United States05/25/2022 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey V errr or whatever you call yourself these day... Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE All I have to do to get you to shut up is prove that the term “collusion” is in any federal law or statute? And you will admit defeat? I wish I could trust you to be a man of your word or at least honor your own requests... First let’s define collusion. Collusion: Collusion is when two or more parties secretly agree to defraud a third-party of their rights or accomplish an illegal purpose. By its very definition collusion is a conspiracy between to or more parties to defraud anyone or commit an illegal act. Do you agree with that definition? I am hiding the source for now until you admit that is what collusion means in the legal sense. No use arguing with these Biden bot asshole. Read an actual attorney like Techno_Fog. More on Special Counsel John Durham’s prosecution of Michael Sussmann: Here are the transcript excerpts from Robby Mook admitting the Alfa Bank allegations - and the idea to spread them to the media - made it all the way up to Hillary Clinton. [link to technofog.substack.com (secure)] Happening now Crooked Hillary had redundancy built into her fake narrative. https://twitter.com/_/status/1529506598510596096 https://twitter.com/_/status/1529510657254690817 Last Edited by MrCoolone on 05/25/2022 01:43 PM |
| CigarTigher
User ID: 76852033 United States05/25/2022 01:45 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83419535 United States05/25/2022 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the way, I got the definition of “collusion” from Cornell law School, easily one of the finest Law Schools in the county. Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Maybe it doesn’t have.gov behind it but it’s legal reference website is actually better than anything the government has. Go to the source. Don't argue with non attorneys and often high school drop out about the law. No name, no contact information, no responsibility for anything they post. I can provide a link to the actual text of the RICO act but we both know he doesn’t want any such link. I win when he refuses to accept anything from any source that has any credibility which is why I lead off with the honey trap that is Wikipedia. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83419535 United States05/25/2022 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the way, I got the definition of “collusion” from Cornell law School, easily one of the finest Law Schools in the county. Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Maybe it doesn’t have.gov behind it but it’s legal reference website is actually better than anything the government has. Go to the source. Don't argue with non attorneys and often high school drop out about the law. No name, no contact information, no responsibility for anything they post. I can provide a link to the actual text of the RICO act but we both know he doesn’t want any such link. I win when he refuses to accept anything from any source that has any credibility which is why I lead off with the honey trap that is Wikipedia. |
| MrCoolone
User ID: 33106931 United States05/25/2022 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By the way, I got the definition of “collusion” from Cornell law School, easily one of the finest Law Schools in the county. Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Maybe it doesn’t have.gov behind it but it’s legal reference website is actually better than anything the government has. Go to the source. Don't argue with non attorneys and often high school drop out about the law. No name, no contact information, no responsibility for anything they post. I can provide a link to the actual text of the RICO act but we both know he doesn’t want any such link. I win when he refuses to accept anything from any source that has any credibility which is why I lead off with the honey trap that is Wikipedia. He's like that slimy Crooked Hillary, plotting, scheming, lying. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83417165 United States05/25/2022 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83417165 Nice try again my little sock puppet friend but the LEGAL SCOPE VERNACULAR was specifically created for the SPECIAL COUNSEL using the word COLLUSION instead of COMSPIRACY for that exact reason otherwise they would've just used that actual word CONSPIRACY because it is in the FEDERAL STATUTE! I quoted for you the actual law now you do the same for me. For the entire Trump presidency we were told that he colluded with the Russians and that such collusion was against federal statues. Prove to me that collusion isn't against the law, post a link to any decision by any court that says collusion is legal under US law. I know that you will refuse to do so and I expect that you will instead of having a reasoned discussion with me resort to your standard practice of acting like a troll or a shill from here on out The RICO act is the government's best tool for going after a conspiracy this huge, everyone in the Obama administration was involved in this scheme to get Trump off the ballot and to remove him from office after he was sworn in. Obama knew, Biden knew, Clinton knew, Comey knew, Mueller knew, Hillary's campaign knew, Podesta knew, everyone involved in the FISA court lies knew they were lying to the FISA court judge, Fusion GPS knew, and because they coordinated their efforts in any fashion is was a huge conspiracy to destroy a sitting president before and after he was elected. Perhaps the only real question I have for you specifically is why do you support what the Democrats and republicans did to Trump, what is your real motivation in your constant spamming of these threads that seek to understand what really happened? I don't expect a honest answer from you to that question either.... You did not link any FEDERAL STATUTE from a ".gov" website with the word COLLUSION, you quoted WKIPEDIA Qtard :rere23: 5 fucking years of hate Trump and when Trump is proven right you are right there stirring the shit. You are a mental case, motherfucker, JD. I bet you go to church then go home and fuck your kids. You ignorant junkie bitch.  Again I don't know who JD is you delusional sock puppet How can Trump be proven right when that bankrupt reality game show host was hired to write the script? Look GLP, it's another Q tard, still regurgitating Trump's bat soup bull shit ORANGE TROJAN HORSE PUPPET NARRATIVE, bought and paid for by the Trump Campaign, like LOCK HER UP slogan, to condition the citizenry into submission, by forcing us to play their rigged game, by their rigged rules, to ask for our rights back, instead of telling us to stand up for our rights None of this were possible if it weren't for Trump setting us up and then selling us out Look GLP, it's another paid shill, that gets paid to pretend like Trump wasn't put on the Obama Birth Certificate Scandal, to smoke out the Tea Party for the IRS, by the Hillary Clinton Campaign, after the 2008 Presidential Election, as the thread below proves from July 2008, during the DNC Primary Season, courtesy of the Hillary Clinton Campaign The DNC was on the verge of extinction virtually on life support after the 2016 election July 2008 Thread: Document forensics expert: Obama "birth certificate" a "horrible forgery" Thread: Wikileaks: leaked document- Trump is pied piper. Hillary helped him get this far Thread: Breaking news!! Salon is reporting Donald Trumps campaign is a charade, an elaborate stunt he concocted a few years ago! (Page 2) |
| SomeRandomPerson
User ID: 79771883 United States05/25/2022 02:07 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rumor has it she had a privet server in her closet @ her home when she was sec of State. Quoting: Garufal Wonder what goodies can be found on THAT. Rumor? Thought that was proven, and she used bleachbit on it. I believe in science NOT religion. Giving me bad karma for that, is anti-religious (you're passing judgement) I am just a man. Of no significance. Who found religion to be full of lies, and wrong doing, conflicted teachings I understand microwave communications. I do not stand for the NWO, it sucks. |
