Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The_Gardener
User ID: 82182619 United States 06/03/2022 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years. Quoting: The_Gardener Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE. It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant. 11,500 BCE? No. Try somewhere around 1400 BCE. Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from? I am not buying it. It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old. This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time. Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis. Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE. Think. Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 03:39 PM Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah? One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist. Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23 Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79009989 United States 06/03/2022 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989 I watched the video. Did not look to be many people there at all. Having irresistable urges to be snide? How quaint. Persisting in talking out of your ass, I see. Because Mauretania is not densely populated you think it's a safe place? My God, what are people like yourself doing on a conspiracy site, I wonder. This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me". The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard... LOL "Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity. Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i was about to say the atlanteans were black wtf? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80004904 but then i remembered the atlan mountains on the west coast of africa. Over time there were 7 basic races in Atlantis. One of them resulted in the "copper colored" people of Meso-America. Another one in the mongolian (yellow) "race"... etc. Look it up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79484991 Persisting in talking out of your ass, I see. Because Mauretania is not densely populated you think it's a safe place? My God, what are people like yourself doing on a conspiracy site, I wonder. This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me". The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard... LOL "Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity. Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? GFY... troll. Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years. Quoting: The_Gardener Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE. It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant. 11,500 BCE? No. Try somewhere around 1400 BCE. Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from? I am not buying it. It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old. This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time. Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis. Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE. Think. If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks. Nope. Nyet. |
The_Gardener
User ID: 82182619 United States 06/03/2022 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years. Quoting: The_Gardener Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE. It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant. 11,500 BCE? No. Try somewhere around 1400 BCE. Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from? I am not buying it. It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old. This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time. Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis. Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE. Think. If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks. Nope. Nyet. Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School. So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy. Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah? One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist. Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23 Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)] |
The_Gardener
User ID: 82182619 United States 06/03/2022 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Remember that when we discuss ancient cultures it helps if we start by reading a book. Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah? One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist. Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23 Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing people forget is Atlantis had ten constituent kingdoms according to Plato, but of all the above water proposals, none seem more plausible than Richat. Great work! Quoting: Cabin Dweller The whole problem with this you see, is the fact that Plato also said Atlantis disappeared beneath the waves of the ocean, all in the course of 24 hours.... So everything you see anywhere else you want absolutely to be Atlantis is just wishful thinking - or good ol' plain disinformation! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825 Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from? I am not buying it. It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old. This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time. Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis. Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE. Think. If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks. Nope. Nyet. Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School. So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy. I am undoubtely even less worried about what you claim to have studied in your "divinity school", idiot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79009989 United States 06/03/2022 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989 This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me". The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard... LOL "Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity. Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? GFY... troll. Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong? It sounds as though this is really important to you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79639457 United States 06/03/2022 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, OP... I guess you feel I am endangering your little pet theory? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825 Y u shillin? EVERYTHING I have posted in this thread is what I know about Atlantis... and you shills have pretended it isn't there. And then YOU ask me why I am shilling? Better start replying (with arguments) to what I already brought to this thread. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825 I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard... LOL "Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity. Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? GFY... troll. Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong? It sounds as though this is really important to you. Start discussing about Atlantis or GTFO. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83466210 United States 06/03/2022 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83466210 United States 06/03/2022 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The_Gardener
User ID: 80240978 United States 06/03/2022 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: The_Gardener It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old. This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time. Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis. Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE. Think. If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks. Nope. Nyet. Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School. So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy. I am Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation. When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417 P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly". Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 05:01 PM Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah? One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist. Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23 Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825 If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks. Nope. Nyet. Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School. So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy. I am Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation. When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417 P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly". lol This ie the only thing where I agree with you... yes it was a typo. What else? A conspiracy? Happy? And if you think I am going to read a 2 volume work... either you must think I am retarded, or you are. If you have no other arguments I'm done. Besides - if that is a genuine quote LINK to it. And that quote BTW - of course - doesn't even prove anything whatsoever. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79448825 United States 06/03/2022 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The_Gardener
User ID: 80240978 United States 06/03/2022 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: The_Gardener Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School. So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy. I am Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation. When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417 P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly". lol This ie the only thing where I agree with you... yes it was a typo. What else? A conspiracy? Happy? And if you think I am going to read a 2 volume work... either you must think I am retarded, or you are. If you have no other arguments I'm done. Besides - if that is a genuine quote LINK to it. And that quote BTW - of course - doesn't even prove anything whatsoever. Ok. [link to books.google.com (secure)] Egyptian Chronicles vol. 2 p. 417 William Palmer, 1861 https://imgur.com/a/Tg8Dg2D P.S. You must really be in the mood to get slaughtered today, because I was in Divinity School for 8 years and near-eastern chronology was my specialty. Now read a book. :-) Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 05:32 PM Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah? One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist. Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23 Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83522509 Switzerland 06/03/2022 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years. Quoting: The_Gardener Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE. It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant. 11,500 BCE? No. Try somewhere around the 14th century BC when ancient Greece was just beginning to become a power in the Mediterranean. Ok. Let's say that the modern human (of today) has been around for about 100'000 years. It has to be more, but let's use that. Now, some schmuck living 90'000 years ago, was uneducated and dumb as a rock, but managed to knock some girl up, and taught his children "something" that he had learned in his lifetime. Then if the next generation learns even 5% more in their lifetime - we would be WAY past our today's civilization by today. So... get used to different. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83522509 Switzerland 06/03/2022 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79009989 United States 06/04/2022 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989 LOL "Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity. Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? GFY... troll. Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong? It sounds as though this is really important to you. Start discussing about Atlantis or GTFO. Um, we are discussing the formation, possibly Atlantis. I said "looks empty" You are having an apoplexy. Remember? |
Meat5000 User ID: 67079247 United Kingdom 06/05/2022 05:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nr 2. And these? Nature doesn't make straight lines with 90-degree angles: Quoting: Karlgel [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] What you are looking at are ancient fields. All those areas are squared chequers are ancient fields. If you go south of the Richat and follow the ancient Gravelines (formed by giant debris being pushed over the land by a tsunami...more than once) you reach green land presently peppered with fields in exactly the same style up to 1k long, subdivided. Also look at how the fields stretch back into the dust until they disappear into history. This same migration is visible in the towns. Notice also how the fields are neatly packed between the gravelines. Theres mud there in the gorges. If you want to find atlantis you have to dig the debris field for 1000 miles around the bottom of the slope around Mauritania, Senegal etc and further up the mountain where the bedrock is lower than sealevel and is presently filled with mud. Also the hundreds of miles of mudflats and the curious uniformity of several cascades of sand dunes that just so happen to appear at the exit points of certain water flow bottlenecks downflow of the Richat. I have found many interesting points to note on the Richat. There is evidence to suggest Quarrying for material and to achieve the look of a Nautilus. There is also a Trident to the West. Ive found a large Triangle in the SE. There are possibly water channels around cliff edges that have Z shapes with 90 degree angles. Fields. So many fields. There are downflow Tidemarks that have a different dark colour in the sand. Thats probanly a good place to look. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74718762 Brazil 06/05/2022 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |