Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,063 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 952,970
Pageviews Today: 1,271,735Threads Today: 317Posts Today: 4,968
10:31 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 03:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
So, OP... I guess you feel I am endangering your little pet theory?
The_Gardener

User ID: 82182619
United States
06/03/2022 03:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years.

Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE.

It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant.

11,500 BCE?

No.

Try somewhere around 1400 BCE.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from?

I am not buying it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old.

This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time.

Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis.

Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE.

Think.

Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 03:39 PM
Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah?
One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist.
Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23

Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79009989
United States
06/03/2022 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...


I watched the video.

Did not look to be many people there at all.


Having irresistable urges to be snide? How quaint.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

Persisting in talking out of your ass, I see.

Because Mauretania is not densely populated you think it's a safe place?

My God, what are people like yourself doing on a conspiracy site, I wonder.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79484991


This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me".

The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


LOL


"Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity.

Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 03:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
i was about to say the atlanteans were black wtf?

but then i remembered the atlan mountains on the west coast of africa.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80004904

Over time there were 7 basic races in Atlantis.

One of them resulted in the "copper colored" people of Meso-America. Another one in the mongolian (yellow) "race"... etc.

Look it up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 03:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...

Persisting in talking out of your ass, I see.

Because Mauretania is not densely populated you think it's a safe place?

My God, what are people like yourself doing on a conspiracy site, I wonder.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79484991


This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me".

The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


LOL


"Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity.

Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

GFY... troll.

Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years.

Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE.

It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant.

11,500 BCE?

No.

Try somewhere around 1400 BCE.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from?

I am not buying it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old.

This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time.

Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis.

Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE.

Think.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol

Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks.

Nope.

Nyet.
The_Gardener

User ID: 82182619
United States
06/03/2022 03:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years.

Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE.

It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant.

11,500 BCE?

No.

Try somewhere around 1400 BCE.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from?

I am not buying it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old.

This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time.

Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis.

Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE.

Think.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol

Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks.

Nope.

Nyet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School.

So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy.
Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah?
One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist.
Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23

Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)]
The_Gardener

User ID: 82182619
United States
06/03/2022 03:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Remember that when we discuss ancient cultures it helps if we start by reading a book.


Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah?
One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist.
Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23

Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 04:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
The thing people forget is Atlantis had ten constituent kingdoms according to Plato, but of all the above water proposals, none seem more plausible than Richat. Great work!
 Quoting: Cabin Dweller

The whole problem with this you see, is the fact that Plato also said Atlantis disappeared beneath the waves of the ocean, all in the course of 24 hours....

So everything you see anywhere else you want absolutely to be Atlantis is just wishful thinking - or good ol' plain disinformation!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...

Where does that theory about one month being called one year by the ancient Egyptians in their Kings' lists come from?

I am not buying it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old.

This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time.

Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis.

Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE.

Think.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol

Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks.

Nope.

Nyet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School.

So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

I am undoubtely even less worried about what you claim to have studied in your "divinity school", idiot.

rofl lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79009989
United States
06/03/2022 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...


This individual is having a fit because I commented "looks pretty empty to me".

The strange illogical obseesions one encounters on computer nets. lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


LOL


"Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity.

Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

GFY... troll.

Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It sounds as though this is really important to you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79639457
United States
06/03/2022 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
So, OP... I guess you feel I am endangering your little pet theory?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Y u shillin?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 04:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
So, OP... I guess you feel I am endangering your little pet theory?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Y u shillin?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79639457

EVERYTHING I have posted in this thread is what I know about Atlantis... and you shills have pretended it isn't there.

And then YOU ask me why I am shilling?

rofl

Better start replying (with arguments) to what I already brought to this thread.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 04:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...

I am not having a fit... you are just talking out of your ass... you won't admit you were plain wrong. The usual retard...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


LOL


"Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity.

Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

GFY... troll.

Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It sounds as though this is really important to you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

Start discussing about Atlantis or GTFO.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83466210
United States
06/03/2022 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Get ahold of the guy in "Expedition Unknown"??🤷‍♀️🤷‍&#97​92;️
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83466210
United States
06/03/2022 04:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Get ahold of the guy in "Expedition Unknown"
The_Gardener

User ID: 80240978
United States
06/03/2022 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...


It's a very well known fact among near-eastern chronologists that the Egyptian king's lists begin with lunations specifically to make them seem very old.

This is a fact that only a historical chronologist would know and since academia has completely written off the "Atlantean" myth as ahistorical, Plato's Egyptian "years" are taken to be solar years by non-specialists when that may not have been the meaning of Egyptian years at all especially at that time.

Try c. 1400 for the cataclysm of Atlantis.

Neither Greece, nor Egypt were even a dawn glimmer in 11,500 BCE.

Think.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol

Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks.

Nope.

Nyet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School.

So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

I am undoubtely even less worried about what you claim to have studied in your "divinity school", idiot.

rofl lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation.

When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417

P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly".

Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 05:01 PM
Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah?
One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist.
Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23

Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 05:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
You know your title is clickbait, OP... the Richat theory is all but new.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 05:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...

If you say so, "near-eastern chronologist".... lol

Nah. I'm not buying it, thanks but no thanks.

Nope.

Nyet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School.

So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

I am undoubtely even less worried about what you claim to have studied in your "divinity school", idiot.

rofl lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation.

When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417

P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly".
 Quoting: The_Gardener

lol

This ie the only thing where I agree with you... yes it was a typo. What else? A conspiracy?

Happy?

And if you think I am going to read a 2 volume work... either you must think I am retarded, or you are.

If you have no other arguments I'm done.

Besides - if that is a genuine quote LINK to it. And that quote BTW - of course - doesn't even prove anything whatsoever.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79448825
United States
06/03/2022 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Get ahold of the guy in "Expedition Unknown"??🤷‍♀️🤷‍&#97​92;️
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83466210

I assure you what he thinks he knows is BS. It's just television. He is part of the project that tries to discredit the existence of the true Atlantis.
The_Gardener

User ID: 80240978
United States
06/03/2022 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...


Okay well I studied near eastern chronology in graduate Divinity School.

So you'll understand that I'm not really worried about what you will or will not buy.
 Quoting: The_Gardener

I am undoubtely even less worried about what you claim to have studied in your "divinity school", idiot.

rofl lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Start by reading Dr William Palmer's 1861 Egyptian Chronicles vols. 1 & 2 where he proves month-years. Now, get to reading because it's a rather lengthy 2 volume dissertation.

When demigods and month-years of Africanus's Ptolemy of Mendes are distinguished from the real historical kings and full 365 day Egyptian years and then compared with the original Manetho and the Turin Kings List, this aids in making out the original Hieratic Egyptian chronological scheme that is older by a thousand years than even the Old Chronicle. - Palmer p. 417

P.S. I think you meant "undoubtedly".
 Quoting: The_Gardener

lol

This ie the only thing where I agree with you... yes it was a typo. What else? A conspiracy?

Happy?

And if you think I am going to read a 2 volume work... either you must think I am retarded, or you are.

If you have no other arguments I'm done.

Besides - if that is a genuine quote LINK to it. And that quote BTW - of course - doesn't even prove anything whatsoever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Ok.

[link to books.google.com (secure)]

Egyptian Chronicles vol. 2 p. 417 William Palmer, 1861

https://imgur.com/a/Tg8Dg2D


P.S. You must really be in the mood to get slaughtered today, because I was in Divinity School for 8 years and near-eastern chronology was my specialty. Now read a book. :-)

Last Edited by The_Gardener on 06/03/2022 05:32 PM
Who is a liar more than one who denies that Jesus is the Messiah?
One who denies the Father and the Son is antichrist.
Whosoever denies the Son does not have not the Father, either. - 1 John 2:22-23

Daily Prayer & Scripture Reading [link to www.parishprayer.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83522509
Switzerland
06/03/2022 05:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
The researcher should keep in mind that the ancient Egyptians would often refer to one lunation (month) as a year in their king's lists to make it seem that they lived for "thousands" of "years". These "years" were lunar years (months) and not solar years.

Therefore "9000" lunations before Solon would be about 750 solar years, which is much more likely and would put the end of the Atlas city state at about 1380 BCE.

It would have to be a time when the early Greek state even existed because the Egyptian priest specifically states that this war between Greece and Atlantis occured when Greece was extant.

11,500 BCE?

No.

Try somewhere around the 14th century BC when ancient Greece was just beginning to become a power in the Mediterranean.
 Quoting: The_Gardener



Ok. Let's say that the modern human (of today) has been around for about 100'000 years. It has to be more, but let's use that.

Now, some schmuck living 90'000 years ago, was uneducated and dumb as a rock, but managed to knock some girl up, and taught his children "something" that he had learned in his lifetime. Then if the next generation learns even 5% more in their lifetime - we would be WAY past our today's civilization by today.

So... get used to different.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83522509
Switzerland
06/03/2022 05:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
So, OP... I guess you feel I am endangering your little pet theory?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


Sorry dude, but I'm not keeping track of ACs. Care to elaborate on your points you're trying to make?

I have an open mind to everything.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79009989
United States
06/04/2022 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
...


LOL


"Looks empty", that is an opinion shrouded in perspective and temporal specificity.

Are you so desperate to "prove someone wrong"? lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

GFY... troll.

Just won't admit your stupidity. Is annoying others your only recourse when you're wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825


It sounds as though this is really important to you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79009989

Start discussing about Atlantis or GTFO.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79448825



Um, we are discussing the formation, possibly Atlantis.

I said "looks empty"

You are having an apoplexy.

Remember?
Meat5000
User ID: 67079247
United Kingdom
06/05/2022 05:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Nr 2. And these? Nature doesn't make straight lines with 90-degree angles:

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Karlgel


What you are looking at are ancient fields. All those areas are squared chequers are ancient fields.
If you go south of the Richat and follow the ancient Gravelines (formed by giant debris being pushed over the land by a tsunami...more than once) you reach green land presently peppered with fields in exactly the same style up to 1k long, subdivided. Also look at how the fields stretch back into the dust until they disappear into history. This same migration is visible in the towns. Notice also how the fields are neatly packed between the gravelines. Theres mud there in the gorges. If you want to find atlantis you have to dig the debris field for 1000 miles around the bottom of the slope around Mauritania, Senegal etc and further up the mountain where the bedrock is lower than sealevel and is presently filled with mud. Also the hundreds of miles of mudflats and the curious uniformity of several cascades of sand dunes that just so happen to appear at the exit points of certain water flow bottlenecks downflow of the Richat.

I have found many interesting points to note on the Richat. There is evidence to suggest Quarrying for material and to achieve the look of a Nautilus. There is also a Trident to the West. Ive found a large Triangle in the SE. There are possibly water channels around cliff edges that have Z shapes with 90 degree angles.
Fields. So many fields.

There are downflow Tidemarks that have a different dark colour in the sand. Thats probanly a good place to look.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74718762
Brazil
06/05/2022 12:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Important NEW possible evidence regarding Atlantes
Looks like the thread derailers showed up, eh, OP? lol

Making that $3.50

ohyeah





GLP