GAVI~ Five reasons why ‘my body, my choice’ doesn’t work for vaccines | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81860323 United States 06/03/2022 05:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
User ID: 78973486 United States 06/03/2022 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72135334 United Kingdom 06/03/2022 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81472211 United States 06/03/2022 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The mask, so to speak, if off these mfers. They completely want full control over your body and they want to put it 6 feet under. We are in the biggest genocide in recorded history. They are really going for their first satanic "commandment"; maintain humanity under 500 million. |
Little Red Hen
User ID: 79679517 United States 06/03/2022 06:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. This “explanation” has ZERO to do with being sovereign over your own body. The point is NOT whether or not I have training/education/ or skills in vaccines to make a decision about their safety. It’s about personal autonomy and my God-given right to decide what I do or do not put in my body. These people are full of hubris and drunk with power. They need to stop sniffing their own farts. I don’t suffer fools or shills lightly... Don’t gaslight me, bro. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80461524 United States 06/03/2022 07:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. These vaccines didn't go through all those checks and balances. It received emergency approval and was rushed to market. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80461524 United States 06/03/2022 07:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83494162 06/03/2022 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. My doctor doesn’t have a clue what’s in their shot and doesn’t want people telling him what to do with his body either. Local doctors have also suggested that patients should complain to health departments because doctors have not been allowed to decide what’s best for their patients. Doctors are under threat to do what the health dept. says or face severe consequences. Kind of like when the Governor says businesses need to decide what’s best for their employees, just make sure they make the right decision or else. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49545246 United States 06/03/2022 07:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. I only count ONE reason, and it is so stupid I refuse to even click the link. My body my choice diesnt apply if the decision is uninformed? Wrong!! There is TONS of people out there who absolutely love CRACK. They have been personally studying it for years. Since you k ow nothing compared to them, should they be able to force you to smoke crack? Not to mention... those same doctors who you claim are all 100 percent on board with the vaccine (ignoring the thousands of doctors who have lost their livelihoods opposing the vaccine) ... many doctors are split on the abortion question, so does "my body, my choice" no longer apply there? I dont need informed consent to decide what I will allow to be done to my body. If I dont want a medical procedure, then I just dont want it. Besides, any doctor who says a particular medical procedure is definitely good for EVERYONE!!! Isnt a good doctor at all. Period. Any person who says people should be forced to get a medical procedure. Isnt a good person. Your pushing a vaccine SO out dated, irs for a virus with 19 in the name. As in 2019. Because the vaccine hasn't changed in nearly 4 years since it was designed and produced. While the virus has become unrecognizable compared to its original 2019 version. If any doctor tells you getting the flu shot from 2019 will help you in 2022, that's definitely not a good doctor. So peddle your crap on Twitter where the dumb people are... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12768460 United Kingdom 06/03/2022 07:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83423201 Finland 06/03/2022 08:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. Google "regulatory capture." |
Grove Street (Redux 3.0)
User ID: 80882194 United States 06/03/2022 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81953666 United States 06/03/2022 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AS AN EXPERT IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE THE AUTHOR SHOULD KNOW HE HAS MISTAKENLY CONFLATED THE WORD REASONS WITH JUSTIFICATIONS. THERE IS NEVER A REASON WHY ANYONE SHOULD ASSUME AUTHORITY OVER THE BODILY CHOICES OF ANOTHER NO MATTER WHAT LEVEL OF EXPERTISE THEY MAY CLAIM. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83366486 United Kingdom 06/03/2022 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fugazi World
User ID: 79369152 United States 06/03/2022 08:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No thinking. No choices. They say jump, we say ‘how high?’ If they say you need 20 shots a year, we say “OK!!” If they want to plant chips in you for the “greater good”, you must do it!! Fuck these psychos!! All they spew is disinformation. Lying sacks of shit. Fugazi World |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19876247 United States 06/03/2022 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. These vaccines didn't go through all those checks and balances. It received emergency approval and was rushed to market. There is NOT now even ONE FDA APPROVED Covid 19 vaccine available to the public Cominatty (sp?) is the ONLY FDA APPROVED Vaccine and it’s not in production The Military of the US begged to wait until Cominatty was available for soldiers But they pushed the EUA version on them anyway NOT ONE PERSON in the US has had an FDA APPROVED Vaccine or booster Let that sink in My friend went to his doctor - who swore up and down that these vaccines were FDA APPROVED- yelled they must be - and stomped out of the examining room after the patient he recommended it to said “I’ll wait until the FDA APPROVED version” I hope these entitled asshats finally figure it out EVERYONE was Duped by saying it “Is safe and effective” instead of FDA Approved |
FixThisShit
User ID: 83107346 United States 06/03/2022 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. Some of us are capable of grasping the literature, and many have spent many many more hours than even our own doctors researching same. And our conclusion after doing so? GAVI is full of shit. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19876247 United States 06/03/2022 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BEEFCAKES
User ID: 78142583 United States 06/03/2022 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78049307 06/03/2022 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2. Life ain’t fair, bitchtits Bill 3. I’m not responsible for the health of others 4. See #3 5. I make my medical decisions, not paid off agenda driven demon infested subhumans, I do get to “have it my way” regardless of what drivel and talking points your psyop consensus management scum comes up with Thanks for playing |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78307047 Canada 06/03/2022 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5. The choice is not necessarily informed Quoting: ~o00O00oo; ) Scientists and regulatory bodies who assess whether or not a vaccine is safe require enormous amounts of expertise and need to review vast amounts of data to make that decision. Most people, even those who are scientifically literate, don’t have the capacity for that level of assessment, which is why we have regulatory bodies and many levels of checks and balances before a vaccine can be rolled out to the general public. This doesn’t only apply to vaccines of course, but to any medicine or medical intervention, and beyond medicine to the motor vehicle or food and drink industries. Thus, holding back on vaccination to monitor side effects in other people – a wait and see approach – would only work if people waited for years before getting vaccinated against COVID-19, and even then only if they gathered data from studies around the world. People do have the right to be informed of potential risks before they take a vaccine, but this information can be provided by their health worker. [link to www.gavi.org (secure)] We should trust that doctors spend ample time researching the products and the implications this will have on your specific genome? I can not think of one doctor who takes his case load home to study up on their patient’s health. This leaves them with over 100 patients a month getting treatment that is, “mandated or standard procedures” handed down by CEOs who have lined pockets. Doctors kill 250k people a year with oopsie doopsies. Trustworthy |
rubthebuddha
User ID: 75695605 United States 06/03/2022 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ben Kenobi
User ID: 79942486 06/03/2022 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83494064 Canada 06/03/2022 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79223871 United States 06/03/2022 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56587788 United States 06/03/2022 09:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOW WHY WOULD "MY CHOICE" WON'T WORK FOR THE VAX BUT IT DOES FOR EVERYTHING ELSE SIMPLE WHEN A CON-MAN WANTS TO TAKE SOMETHING FROM YOU HE HAS TO TELL YOU OR GIVE A "TELL" HE HAS TO DO THIS SO HE DOESN'T DIE FOR VIOLATING YOUR FREEWILL AND THIS IS THE POINT OF "MY CHOICE" FREEWILL IS A FREE GIFT OF THE GRACE OF THE FATHER IN HEAVEN ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS FREEWILL WILL BURN AND BE BURNED UP BUT ONLY IF YOU CAN CLAIM YOUR FREEWILL AS A CHILD OF THE FATHER IN HEAVEN ONCE YOU DO THIS ALL VIOLATORS WILL BURN AND BE BURNED UP WHAT IS LEFT IS THE NEW EARTH IT IS WRITTEN AMEN |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56587788 United States 06/03/2022 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So “gavi ” is stating we are too stupid to make an informed decision. Do I have that correct? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12768460 REMEMBER WHEN PIGLOSY SAID YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WANT I AM HERE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU WANT SO YES WE ARE TO STUPID TO MAKE OUR OWN DECISIONS IN OTHER WORDS THE GOVERNMENT IS OUR GOD |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81403305 United States 06/03/2022 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82876934 06/03/2022 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jackfoos
User ID: 75483061 United States 06/03/2022 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So “gavi ” is stating we are too stupid to make an informed decision. Do I have that correct? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12768460 Not only that^^^ Even if you did know, your learning is mostly wrong. You need controlled experimental experiments to prove facts that are mostly just right off the grasp of the teeming masses. It is why professional experts are needed to guide the public and educate. Misinformation can be as deadly as the actual disease if left to the layperson. A layperson, who otherwise would not have studied the science, might not be capable enough to make informed decisions. A body might know science, but we can't afford to wait and see if they were right. That is why it becomes difficult and even dangerous to let the public think that they might know what is best for them. Public safety is too important, and sometimes it may even be hard for many to actually understand why. ^^My overly simplified take on every bullshit Center for Disease Control press conference. Control is the operative word. A cheaper way might be to preach killing yourself. Numbertards and odds makers might be delighted. I voted for Kodos. |