Woman Experiences Glitch In The Matrix

Not bad.

Damn one armed up, guy with tits, I'm sure this story is legit, cause the news told me.

Majority vote error-correction makes such "miracles" a statistical inevitability.

Majority logic decoding
---
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Not a matrix, not a Simulation, just a very specific design of a black hole computer... where the number of repetitions is (most likely) 12, that number being one of the very few (only 5 possible) optimal choices in 3D space, with all possible choices being represented by Platonic solids.

Platonic solid
---
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

If you want to experience a "glitch" of your own, you only need to act genuinely randomly at just the right moment (immediately before the black hole contracts), effectively introducing an uncorrectable "error" into the whole system, and (in the best case scenario) half of the 12 versions of you will end up experiencing a "glitch". The other half won't notice anything.

Gibberish?

Of course it is. It's all just gibberish, anyway, this whole "reality". Introducing some more gibberish into it really won't make any difference.

If you liked the gibberish so far, then here's some more...

It is very likely (virtually guaranteed) that the builders of this black hole computer are just as stuck (as we are) in a higher-dimensional (at least 5D) space that's some variation of hyper-torus... which would make their action as fully deterministic as ours.

In other words... we're all sharing a common no-free-will hyper-spatial Hell... unless we learn how to use Infinity (aka Nagual to some) as a weapon.

The potential is there... but, again, it's not a given that it will ever be realized.

there is no glitch.....

she cut a lemon in half then went back
and cut the other half of the lemon again....

there was no "FULL LEMON" after she cut it in half....

attention whore grabs attention of simpletons while promoting her family business

Some claimed that when she cut the lemon in half it stuck together and she simply cut it again. And that seemed plausible until I noticed how she tried to separate the lemon with her hands and even grabbed the other half thinking it was the one she cut and had grabbed the wrong half.

I would think if you cut a lemon in half and then pick it up and grab it with both hands it would separate. But hers did not.

Juan star for using the soy word of GLITCH...

After my previous post, I got a GLITCH (yes, I want to irritate the NPCs) of my own -- a triple-folded (last fold perpendicular to the first two) bill of the second highest value in local circulation (something akin to an American finding a triple-folded $100 bill) in my pocket.

First of all, I never, ever fold my bills like that.

Secondly, the last time I checked that bill (a few days ago) it was folded in my perfectly ordinary simple-fold manner.

And, lastly, no one but myself has had access to that bill, so unless I got up in my sleep, and sleepwalked into folding it like that (which can be easily checked by "some" people)... I'm going to take this "event" as a genuine "glitch"... or, rather, as an example of how the system can be gamed, and tricked into communicating (distributing) useful messages between the different "sub-verses" (all 12 of them) "in" this black hole computer.

So... this has got me thinking...

I guess that somebody should now develop a communication method (in >this< "sub-verse", since at least a half of the other ones have obviously already figured it out) that will satisfy the following properties... kind of, in just the broadest possible strokes (some more mathematical gibberish ahead):

a) There are N (in general, with N=12 in our special case) participants in the communication.

b) Each participant i can (simultaneously) send a message Mi (i<=N)m where Mi is a member of the set M of all the messages sent by all participants (i.e. {M1, M2... MN}), and M is a subset of M* which consists of all the possible messages that can be sent.

c) M* can be any (meaningful) set (including misfolded bills), but for starters, I guess the simplest set of {0,1} will be best (encoded by some physical property of an elementary particle, like spin, polarization, etc.).

d) Messages are constantly sent by all participants at regular time intervals (no shorter than Planck time), giving the Mi(t) as the actual, proper time-dependent form of Mi.

e) Only messages M+(t) (the + sign signifying their importance) that have been sent by the majority (more than 50%) of the participants at any moment will be detected by all participants

f) What d) implies is that K number of participants (where K<N/2) will receive M+(t) at some point t+deltaT that will be different from the Mk(t) (for k in K) that they had sent in the first place... meaning to say that M+(t+deltaT) will be detected as a "GLITCH" (locally interpreted as "randomness" caused by quantum fluctuations) in K "sub-verses"!

g) What f) further implies is that at least one (K>=1) "sub-verse" must send Mk(t) that will be different from the M+(t) sent by the majority.

In other words, in this "multi-verse" (black hole computer), it is the voice of the majority that ultimately decides what the message is, but it is the the minority that will actually receive the Real Message MR+(t+deltaT) which the opposite (in the case of M* being a simple binary dictionary) of the sent M+(t).

g) ... and I've now lost my train of thought, so I'll make the rest of it as short as possible

The communication system between the "sub-verses" should be designed in such a way as to guarantee that all participants can decode the full Real Message (locally misinterpreted as "errors" caused by quantum fluctuations) in some (yet to be determined, depending on the length of the message, for one) time interval T.

The problem is... no fully automated system, regardless of how complex it may be (including any one based on "true, quantum randomness"... which, apparently, doesn't even exist) can guarantee that K>1 (true randomness).

It will take a person (who, hopefully, is beyond the NPC phase of complete obliviousness to reality) to do that, so the experimental setup (for setting up the prototype of the system), in the most general terms, should consist of somebody "generating" random 0s and 1s (hitting two buttons completely randomly, cartoon-style), some hardware detecting and encoding (into physical properties) those button presses, sending such "messages" at strictly-defined time intervals, and then... looking for "errors" (received bits being different from the sent ones) in the detector.

So... the question is: How exactly does one construct such a communication system that will pass information not in the messages themselves, but in the "random" "errors" the messages end up with... and, also, guarantee that Real Messages will be successfully decoded by all participants.

It's a genuine head-scratcher, isn't it?

The good news, again, is that at least half of the "sub-verses" have obviously figured that one out... but the people (both different people, and different versions of those people) who've figured it out may not be in the right position to actually make their discovery a reality.

... and that's why you need a functional, reality-based society in the first place, so that all the right people can reach all the right positions to pull (together) something as "impossible" (extremely unlikely) as this.

P.S.
I'm right now too disappointed in everybody to give this post any further checks for logical or grammar errors, so... take it for what it is -- just some (half-baked pseudo-) mathematical gibberish.

That is, no one should take any claims (including any "serious", "science-based" ones) too seriously until those claims have been verified by oneself.

They stuck together...The seal between the slices was not broken...

Could be a hoax or she was daydreaming and never cut it properly in the first place. It could also be real but there's no way to authenticate anything from that video.

could this be like that kid on that that fair ground that disappeared on that merry go ride? was that kid even there in the first place?

My guess is the knife just slipped as it was wet and slid down the side of the lemon by her thumb and was not noticed.

Can't really tell from the video that it was definitely cut.

She clearly cut the lemon twice and was freaked out by it. And the more I watch it the same is true.

If you go back in memory to examine an anomalous event, you will discover that the phenomenon is attended by a moment of inattention. That inattentive state is an indication we make decisions from another position of our consciousness.

The actual mechanism is thus: we think of something, and as it is being manifested in 3d, we intercede with our emotions, and send it back for reworking, so it will match your personal experience. Shunyamurti.

We sometimes don't actually have to exteriorize our inner experience completely, as we are learning faster than the manifestation of it. Superluminal perception.

Global events are done by many people reworking their manifestation mid flight. Some notice the variance. The very fact that some even notice it is interesting.

Perhaps because to notice is implicitly the lesson....to become aware of who you really are, the author of your experience.

Now this gets muddy when you realize your mind is not your own. Your thoughts are programmed to think with certain predilections from birth by the environment, people and our hacked biology. In reality, you don't even exist. So why create something which is not the real you behind the you?

The real you intercedes as you become increasingly self aware. This takes energy. We gather energy by reducing bad habits. We do this by having disciplines which help us focus our intent.

Usually we show we are attempting to do this by trying to lose weight, kick an addiction. Meditate ritualistically, and by other means which requires a change in our behaviour. We find a focus around which we can isolate our newfound awareness.