Roe V Wade Is About Medical Privacy NOT ABORTION, Now They Can Datamine Vaccine Status! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78222873 United States 06/24/2022 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82301076 United States 06/24/2022 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget the abortion drama, this has nothing to do with abortion, this has everything to do with your freedoms to choose. Quoting: notwhatitseems 16320229 How you ask? well Roe versus Wade is about medical privacy, the abortion stuff was just a side effect of that ruling, and precedent. So now the don't have to respect your medical privacy, as in who's vaccinated and who's not, that is the question! Now America's medical privacy and it's rules are changing, and you can bet it's all about the clot shot! Please pin this, we need to be discussing this aspect of the ruling. Love and light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seems like glp is more concerned with their doom boners over potential violence due to the ruling than the real issue at hand. Weigh in, death by a thousand cuts, this ruling is one of those cuts, as much as I abhor abortion, I will admit there are only 3 reasons I would condone abortion, rape(don't need those genes), incest(genetically dangerous), and medical issues with the mother that could seriously endanger either mother or baby during pregnancy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77231186 United States 06/24/2022 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The link to information privacy Beyond these implications, some privacy experts suggest that issues of decisional privacy are intimately tied to another kind of privacy (and one that is also a hot-button issue in US courts today): information privacy. Among the most concerning direct possibilities is the prospect that location-based ad targeting becomes weaponized in state-level abortion battles. As it stands, advertisers already have data insights on whether a person has visited an abortion clinic. “There are anti-abortion groups that will target advertising to people sitting in abortion clinics using geofencing [technology,]” says Dellinger. These practices are likely to become more common now that abortion rights will become the provenance of states. Of course, Dellinger suggests, adtech companies and ad publishers could take a stance and refuse to take advertising dollars from such organizations — but at the end of the day, she finds such a prospect unlikely. “Money is money,” she says. From a broader perspective, the philosophical and legal debates surrounding personal decision-making concerns both the kind of privacy implied in the 14th Amendment as well as information privacy. “Think about … the content that you receive when you're on your phone,” she poses. “[Targeted] advertising is driven by profiles of you and inferences about you drawn from what you click on, what you read and how you spend your time on your device — [as well as] lookalike populations of you.” This pattern impedes on decisional privacy, she says. “When you put in a search to Google, is it some objective thing where you're getting all the results that are responsive to your request? No. You're getting the things that … ads [support]. On Amazon, what do you see first? Amazon’s ‘preferred’ products.” By shaping the content that consumers encounter each day, Dellinger argues, advertising is “affecting the information we have access to and affecting our decision-making.” Dellinger likens this status quo to a surveillance state. “The content being pushed to you … and that surveillance that's associated with that is going to affect people's freedom to make individual decisions post-Roe. And that's what I think is most frightening about this situation.” Source: [link to www.thedrum.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77231186 United States 06/24/2022 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget the abortion drama, this has nothing to do with abortion, this has everything to do with your freedoms to choose. Quoting: notwhatitseems 16320229 How you ask? well Roe versus Wade is about medical privacy, the abortion stuff was just a side effect of that ruling, and precedent. So now the don't have to respect your medical privacy, as in who's vaccinated and who's not, that is the question! Now America's medical privacy and it's rules are changing, and you can bet it's all about the clot shot! Please pin this, we need to be discussing this aspect of the ruling. Love and light! Roe v. Wade On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy", which protects a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. It's about future mandatory vaccinations you fools! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just figured this out myself, and came here to make a thread on the subject. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77231186 This is all about Mandatory Vaccinations in the future! When it comes to data privacy especially medical this is a gaping wound to Americans liberty to choose for themselves. Truly a chilling effect. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget the abortion drama, this has nothing to do with abortion, this has everything to do with your freedoms to choose. Quoting: notwhatitseems 16320229 How you ask? well Roe versus Wade is about medical privacy, the abortion stuff was just a side effect of that ruling, and precedent. So now the don't have to respect your medical privacy, as in who's vaccinated and who's not, that is the question! Now America's medical privacy and it's rules are changing, and you can bet it's all about the clot shot! Please pin this, we need to be discussing this aspect of the ruling. Love and light! Roe v. Wade On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy", which protects a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. It's about future mandatory vaccinations you fools! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83197907 United States 06/24/2022 08:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56020627 Canada 06/24/2022 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They already made everyone disclose their vaxx status earlier this year at most jobs and colleges in the U.S. They also demanded to see vaxx proof in many large cities across the U.S. earlier this year. We basically know we don't have any medical privacy, it's been over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83197907 This closes a loophole some exercised, this overturning was required, next you will see further erosions of rights and lirlberties when the start meddling with HIPA |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83748040 United States 06/24/2022 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget the abortion drama, this has nothing to do with abortion, this has everything to do with your freedoms to choose. Quoting: notwhatitseems 16320229 How you ask? well Roe versus Wade is about medical privacy, the abortion stuff was just a side effect of that ruling, and precedent. So now the don't have to respect your medical privacy, as in who's vaccinated and who's not, that is the question! Now America's medical privacy and it's rules are changing, and you can bet it's all about the clot shot! Please pin this, we need to be discussing this aspect of the ruling. Love and light! Roe v. Wade On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy", which protects a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. It's about future mandatory vaccinations you fools! . I don't think so, Tim. They didn't appeal the 14th amendment. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77231186 United States 06/24/2022 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They already made everyone disclose their vaxx status earlier this year at most jobs and colleges in the U.S. They also demanded to see vaxx proof in many large cities across the U.S. earlier this year. We basically know we don't have any medical privacy, it's been over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83197907 This closes a loophole some exercised, this overturning was required, next you will see further erosions of rights and lirlberties when the start meddling with HIPA They don't do anything unless it benefits the government elites somehow. It's like the new gun law ruling. The new ruling makes it possible for most people to get concealed gun permits. But to get a concealed gun permit in most states, you have to be fingerprinted with a thorough FBI background check. So to carry a handgun, which should be legal without any measures, you have to give the government all your metadata. Everything they do is about getting more metadata on people. So now you can carry a handgun, but you can't buy any ammo for it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77861487 United States 06/24/2022 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was never about privacy and you're stupid to think it was. That was the pretext the court used to justifying a right that was never in the Constitution. This was and always will be about killing innocents in favor of free sex and social change. Chances are very good the OP and lemmings in this thread were successful suvivors of abortion attempts. Tge country was in a state of protesting and riots of that day that todays protests and looting are tame. The young fuktards of today don't even know how to riot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83747665 United States 06/24/2022 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Agent 99
User ID: 77082640 United States 06/24/2022 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77623085 Canada 06/25/2022 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It doesn't make any sense the gov would do this unless it was insidious and part of their plan so either its about diminishing privacy, or to destabilize and create outcomes with violent protest to further erode freedom. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77623085 Canada 06/25/2022 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73314314 United States 06/25/2022 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget the abortion drama, this has nothing to do with abortion, this has everything to do with your freedoms to choose. Quoting: notwhatitseems 16320229 How you ask? well Roe versus Wade is about medical privacy, the abortion stuff was just a side effect of that ruling, and precedent. So now the don't have to respect your medical privacy, as in who's vaccinated and who's not, that is the question! Now America's medical privacy and it's rules are changing, and you can bet it's all about the clot shot! Please pin this, we need to be discussing this aspect of the ruling. Love and light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83739154 United States 06/25/2022 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73314314 United States 06/25/2022 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay I gave you a pin. I think they have deeper plans over this and they always hire folks to do fake protests. I really don’t believe anything is that grassroots anymore. Besides people can sit back and say to themselves, “ I don’t have to protest because SOMEONE ELSE is already protesting for me”. That’s why they do fake protests…. for CONTROL. It’s like lighting a back fire, however sometimes just like a fire it gets away from them. They want ownership of the peasants both MIND, BODY, and SOUL. RESIST EVIL. TRUST NO MAN. Watch and pray. |
Imlay
User ID: 83750878 United States 06/25/2022 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First, I am all for stopping abortion. Their long-term plan for pandemics includes us getting their never-ending series of shots. Clearly not enough people bought into the plan and they will continue to chip away at our freedoms until you can't say no. Last Edited by Imlay on 06/25/2022 09:24 AM We're king of the beasts but we're hardly civilized. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77580451 United States 06/25/2022 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay I gave you a pin. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73314314 I think they have deeper plans over this and they always hire folks to do fake protests. I really don’t believe anything is that grassroots anymore. Besides people can sit back and say to themselves, “ I don’t have to protest because SOMEONE ELSE is already protesting for me”. That’s why they do fake protests…. for CONTROL. It’s like lighting a back fire, however sometimes just like a fire it gets away from them. They want ownership of the peasants both MIND, BODY, and SOUL. RESIST EVIL. TRUST NO MAN. Watch and pray. Yes, occasionally. But, never underestimate the power of the useful idiots created with decades of relentless propaganda. I heard some randos chatting in their yard about going to protest yesterday. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78320186 United States 06/25/2022 09:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80114030 06/25/2022 09:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, when you fight against abortion, you increase the population of the people you are trying to get rid of... Don't you see how the powers that be area playing you for fools? Of course not. |
brilock
User ID: 80706686 United States 06/25/2022 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the overturn of roe is not at all about privacy because the question of "fetal life" is involved in addition to the privacy of the woman. beyond that, "privacy" was only inferred by the original roe court to be a part of the due process clause of the 14th amendment regarding liberty. due process is to be followed when debating whether to limit or deny life, liberty, or property to an individual, or such other unenumerated rights that have been a longstanding part of the american culture. "abortion" is not an enumerated right, nor has it been understood to be a part of the founding or enduring culture of the country. therefore, not covered by the constitution and therefore to be restricted, regulated, or permitted by the citizens of each state through their elected state representatives. can't get any more democratic than that! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50839460 United States 06/25/2022 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seems like glp is more concerned with their doom boners over potential violence due to the ruling than the real issue at hand. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56020627 Weigh in, death by a thousand cuts, this ruling is one of those cuts, as much as I abhor abortion, I will admit there are only 3 reasons I would condone abortion, rape(don't need those genes), incest(genetically dangerous), and medical issues with the mother that could seriously endanger either mother or baby during pregnancy. i agree with you. biden mentioned rape and incest first yesterday. then i was empathetic and sad. then i thought biden knows a lot about that.!! 620,000 abortions yearly. 11 percent of all pregnancies. less than 1.5 percent of abortions are from rape and incest. |
IChoose
User ID: 80412484 06/25/2022 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80602072 United States 06/25/2022 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is utter garbage. One, and file this under duh, you are not required to carry a cell phone with you at all times. Your cell phone has been a spying device for decades. If you want privacy, leave it at home. Don't bring the spy device with you. Everyone is acting like they can't survive without this prisoner device. You are lugging around a modern ankle ball and chain and then complain that the wardens can find you because you won't leave it behind. You get what you deserve. |
Crypto-Tard
User ID: 78144147 United States 06/25/2022 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is no right to privacy in the USA. In public, there is no expectation of privacy. This is why you can take photos of anything in public. Be very careful, where they gerrymander the privacy line. They can literally take away huge swaths of rights with the stroke of a pen! When you are afraid of losing your life, you have already lost your life. Don't be afraid. |