Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,181 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 893,610
Pageviews Today: 1,593,094Threads Today: 676Posts Today: 12,014
06:12 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...

 
Daozen
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 83754148
Taiwan
06/26/2022 04:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
So you declare: "it is assumed that for The Dutchman, or B Abraxas... everything he says is under penalty of perjury, if he consents to staying in your reality."

The default is that he is under penalty of perjury oath, to everyone, with full commercial liability, all the time. This is on a per statement basis. Every dishonest statement means he loses 20% of his energy in your reality. 5 lies and he's out. Gone.

He can contest your decree, in writing, at (your email here). Or, he has to explicitly declare, before or after every statement, verbally or in writing, that what he just said is not under penalty of perjury. Who has time for that? So it's a trap, but a fair one.

tl;dr, if you placed certain people under a default penalty of Perjury oath. i.e the default setting in Your Private Dream, was the named parties are permanently under a default penalty of perjury, unless they contest it, or declare otherwise...

Kind of a byzantine legal trick. But as they won't play fair.. why let them abuse grace?

When you come into someone's house, wipe your damn shoes, and wipe that smirk off your face, or face the consequences.
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79815827
Latvia
06/26/2022 05:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
I made at least one statement along these lines once, I have wondered whether mentioning possible legal rammifications would get it to stop
Daozen  (OP)

User ID: 83754148
Taiwan
06/26/2022 05:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
I made at least one statement along these lines once, I have wondered whether mentioning possible legal rammifications would get it to stop
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79815827


Just bashed out that post before I had a shower. Gonna perfect it tonight.

All I know is that they are terrified of perjury oaths. They scuttle away every time, without fail.

Putting them under assumed, default perjury, instead of opt in perjury... and they're caught in a vice. Kind of Draconian, but we have no choice. We've exhausted all other options.

They deserve it.

tl;dr: The following named and listed parties, in this reality, are under automatic penalty of perjury, should they consent to being here. They must OPT OUT on a statement by statement basis.

For those named and listed parties... Perjury is no longer voluntary or opt in.

Of course, it's only named and listed people. Prolly 5% of the total population. You're not gonna put the guys in the bar bragging about their conquests, or fishing expeditions under perjury... that would be horrific. It's just the real douchebags you have to trap.
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."
Daozen  (OP)

User ID: 83849014
Taiwan
07/14/2022 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
todo
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."
Daozen  (OP)

User ID: 83907025
Taiwan
07/24/2022 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
need to get this up.

could be a gamechanger.
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1073423
United Kingdom
07/24/2022 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Document and verify on all harmful effects of who holds liabiity under the penalty of perjury.

- You're most welcome -

:)




burnit
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83182724
United States
07/24/2022 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Dont they have to be aware of or in some sort of voluntary agreement to proceed in that framework or something?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83182724
United States
07/24/2022 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Dont they have to be aware of or in some sort of voluntary agreement to proceed in that framework or something?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1073423
United Kingdom
07/24/2022 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Dont they have to be aware of or in some sort of voluntary agreement to proceed in that framework or something?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83182724


Yes, it's called 'Oath of office' and so they are aware.
Daozen  (OP)

User ID: 83907025
Taiwan
07/24/2022 02:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Document and verify on all harmful effects of who holds liabiity under the penalty of perjury.

- You're most welcome -

:)




burnit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1073423


I sense this is key, Sir...

But I can't quite get your drift...

Could you dumb it down a little, for a special needs boy on a hot tin roof?
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."
Daozen  (OP)

User ID: 83907025
Taiwan
07/24/2022 02:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: You could put miscreants under assumed Penalty of Perjury Oath, unless they explicitly declared otherwise, per statement, in writing...
Dont they have to be aware of or in some sort of voluntary agreement to proceed in that framework or something?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83182724


Very, very good question.

A lot of people don't get this.

Silence (an unchallenged statement) IS AGREEMENT under commercial law.

You DO NOT need their opt in assent (their signature)...

All you need is for them to not challenge your own sworn statements.

That equals consent on their part.

~O~

The rough wording is:

"You consent and agree that this is a private universe, you are here of your own free will. By entering here, you CONSENT IN FULL, that EVERY statement you make in this simulation, is Under Penalty of Perjury, with full commercial liability, and you agree to self-annihilate if you tell a lie."

You'd only put a few people on that protocol... cos it's horrible.

But it's worth a shot.

Silence is supremely powerful.
Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless.

Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app

The world is a feeling.

"The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the
world is made of words."





GLP