Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says | |
Dirck de Noorman
User ID: 82671024 United States 07/10/2022 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says This should be fun. Quoting: DangerClose Why do I feel distracted? Like there's something bigger going on behind the curtains? Then again, Twatter is a BIG HAND in this New(Liberal) World Order. Not sure how to classify Musk but I'm kinda on the fence when it comes to him. He's definitely a bad guy but he's playing kind of a Anti-Bad Guy role? Like the Punisher is an Anti-Hero, he does heroic shit but in the end he takes justice into his own hands. Musk, doing bad guy shit in the background but he wants to flaunt an image of a good guy. Not too big into comics but surely Musk has an equivalent from the comic realm musk's equivalent in comic world is the character "The Poser" he pretends to have new products available on the horizon so he can pump his stock value, then never delivers on what he promised Your ignorance is beyond laughable obviously you have no clue you might want to do some research so you don’t look so damn ignorant do research on what? all the time musk over promised and under delivered, all while his stock price rose to being highly over valued how's that AI robot he said would be ready in 3 months, about 3 months ago now? bout as ready as that FSD he said would be ready next year for like 8 years how's that hyper loop in vegas? the one with a tunnel with telsa cars in them...tesla cars that need drivers... he can't even make his teslas drive themselves in a tunnel at 30 mph what a tony stark genius!!!! maybe he can work on a new flame thrower or tequila or drive in movie or atvs or maybe he can build a kessler cage of starlink satellites fucking up his own rocket launches a true genius if there ever was one |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says like this discovery "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83473879 United States 07/10/2022 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Big mistake for Twitter, they really should have just allowed Musk to move on, and been relieved they didn't get slammed with a 'breach of contract' lawsuit by him. Perhaps he can flip this lawsuit into that sort of lawsuit before his attorneys are finished with Twitter. Because that's why Musk terminated the 'deal'. Twitter GREATLY underestimated the number of bots in Twitter, to Musk. And when he got involved with Twitter he soon learned the number is staggering. Not to mention the number of 'bot bosses'.. which is never mentioned anywhere either. Apparently 'wealthy' bot bosses, by the way. Twitter knows all about the bots, and promises each boss can have between 50-100 each, or more. (not sure how many more). Some bot bosses run groups in Twitter, and other bosses 'have people' who do that for them. Groups where more bots are recruited, trained, etc. These groups are for various things, whatever topic is desired, (even and especially those that are controversial, sexual or politically driven, etc), including some from other countries. One sitting on the sidelines, watching all this, has to wonder.. who on the outside is paying the BIG bucks? And why have bots making profiles and leading trains? And why of all places, Twitter? Not only Twitter.. Some bot bosses sit on Twitter and send their bots out to other social media pretending to 'be them', running their accounts at those sites in their name. There is some corruption that runs DEEP in Twitter, and most who use Twitter evidently have NO clue. Apparently, Musk caught on, and said 'no way, jose, i'm out!' musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] You are like a broken record. You're just flailing around like a retarded gimp that is screaming at the sky. Your argument is weak. |
Mike Oxlong
User ID: 83787922 United States 07/10/2022 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says This should be fun. Quoting: DangerClose Why do I feel distracted? Like there's something bigger going on behind the curtains? Then again, Twatter is a BIG HAND in this New(Liberal) World Order. Not sure how to classify Musk but I'm kinda on the fence when it comes to him. He's definitely a bad guy but he's playing kind of a Anti-Bad Guy role? Like the Punisher is an Anti-Hero, he does heroic shit but in the end he takes justice into his own hands. Musk, doing bad guy shit in the background but he wants to flaunt an image of a good guy. Not too big into comics but surely Musk has an equivalent from the comic realm Edit add: don't mind the Sensei Wu avatar. When I'm hanging with the little bro we watch a show and Sensei Wu is just my fave. Same. I can't figure him out... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Big mistake for Twitter, they really should have just allowed Musk to move on, and been relieved they didn't get slammed with a 'breach of contract' lawsuit by him. Perhaps he can flip this lawsuit into that sort of lawsuit before his attorneys are finished with Twitter. Because that's why Musk terminated the 'deal'. Twitter GREATLY underestimated the number of bots in Twitter, to Musk. And when he got involved with Twitter he soon learned the number is staggering. Not to mention the number of 'bot bosses'.. which is never mentioned anywhere either. Apparently 'wealthy' bot bosses, by the way. Twitter knows all about the bots, and promises each boss can have between 50-100 each, or more. (not sure how many more). Some bot bosses run groups in Twitter, and other bosses 'have people' who do that for them. Groups where more bots are recruited, trained, etc. These groups are for various things, whatever topic is desired, (even and especially those that are controversial, sexual or politically driven, etc), including some from other countries. One sitting on the sidelines, watching all this, has to wonder.. who on the outside is paying the BIG bucks? And why have bots making profiles and leading trains? And why of all places, Twitter? Not only Twitter.. Some bot bosses sit on Twitter and send their bots out to other social media pretending to 'be them', running their accounts at those sites in their name. There is some corruption that runs DEEP in Twitter, and most who use Twitter evidently have NO clue. Apparently, Musk caught on, and said 'no way, jose, i'm out!' musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] You are like a broken record. You're just flailing around like a retarded gimp that is screaming at the sky. Your argument is weak. uuh yeah... i keep repeating the same thing cause you dumb fucks keep acting liek musk and tesla didn't use twitter bots to pump tesla stock there's no argument to be had, it's merely a presentation of facts and I will keep presenting those facts every time you cognitive dissonant tards say twitter uses bots and ignore musk using twitter bots |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says This should be fun. Quoting: DangerClose Why do I feel distracted? Like there's something bigger going on behind the curtains? Then again, Twatter is a BIG HAND in this New(Liberal) World Order. Not sure how to classify Musk but I'm kinda on the fence when it comes to him. He's definitely a bad guy but he's playing kind of a Anti-Bad Guy role? Like the Punisher is an Anti-Hero, he does heroic shit but in the end he takes justice into his own hands. Musk, doing bad guy shit in the background but he wants to flaunt an image of a good guy. Not too big into comics but surely Musk has an equivalent from the comic realm Edit add: don't mind the Sensei Wu avatar. When I'm hanging with the little bro we watch a show and Sensei Wu is just my fave. Same. I can't figure him out... what's to figure out? he's a spoiled brat who grew up in luxury and wealth and had everything handed to him on a silver platter and he then used daddy's money to buy companies other people already started and take all the credit and profit |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83473879 United States 07/10/2022 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Myst~Wyks Big mistake for Twitter, they really should have just allowed Musk to move on, and been relieved they didn't get slammed with a 'breach of contract' lawsuit by him. Perhaps he can flip this lawsuit into that sort of lawsuit before his attorneys are finished with Twitter. Because that's why Musk terminated the 'deal'. Twitter GREATLY underestimated the number of bots in Twitter, to Musk. And when he got involved with Twitter he soon learned the number is staggering. Not to mention the number of 'bot bosses'.. which is never mentioned anywhere either. Apparently 'wealthy' bot bosses, by the way. Twitter knows all about the bots, and promises each boss can have between 50-100 each, or more. (not sure how many more). Some bot bosses run groups in Twitter, and other bosses 'have people' who do that for them. Groups where more bots are recruited, trained, etc. These groups are for various things, whatever topic is desired, (even and especially those that are controversial, sexual or politically driven, etc), including some from other countries. One sitting on the sidelines, watching all this, has to wonder.. who on the outside is paying the BIG bucks? And why have bots making profiles and leading trains? And why of all places, Twitter? Not only Twitter.. Some bot bosses sit on Twitter and send their bots out to other social media pretending to 'be them', running their accounts at those sites in their name. There is some corruption that runs DEEP in Twitter, and most who use Twitter evidently have NO clue. Apparently, Musk caught on, and said 'no way, jose, i'm out!' musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] You are like a broken record. You're just flailing around like a retarded gimp that is screaming at the sky. Your argument is weak. uuh yeah... i keep repeating the same thing cause you dumb fucks keep acting liek musk and tesla didn't use twitter bots to pump tesla stock there's no argument to be had, it's merely a presentation of facts and I will keep presenting those facts every time you cognitive dissonant tards say twitter uses bots and ignore musk using twitter bots That has nothing to do with this specific contract. You might as well just start talking about the weather. You are just wasting everybody's time and wasting the forums bandwidth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] You are like a broken record. You're just flailing around like a retarded gimp that is screaming at the sky. Your argument is weak. uuh yeah... i keep repeating the same thing cause you dumb fucks keep acting liek musk and tesla didn't use twitter bots to pump tesla stock there's no argument to be had, it's merely a presentation of facts and I will keep presenting those facts every time you cognitive dissonant tards say twitter uses bots and ignore musk using twitter bots That has nothing to do with this specific contract. You might as well just start talking about the weather. You are just wasting everybody's time and wasting the forums bandwidth. and you have read the contract? where in the contract is the clause about bots? so musk and tesla using twitter bots to pump telsa stocks has nothing to do with musk not wanting to buy twitter cause of the twitter bots like the ones he and telsa used to profit? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71221969 United States 07/10/2022 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Yeah Twitter pissed and moaned that Elon was going to buy it now they are pissed he wont buy it... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79815827 Latvia 07/10/2022 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81140525 United States 07/10/2022 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Yeah Twitter pissed and moaned that Elon was going to buy it now they are pissed he wont buy it... well twitter eventually agreed to the deal, then musk backed out... and he will now have to pay a 1 billion dollar breakup fee, plus like 100 mil in lawyer fees |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says what changes is elon used the bogus twitter deal to sell some of his stock at a high price "How Elon’s bizarre Twitter takeover saga could have just been a cover for him to sell $8.5 billion in Tesla stock" [link to fortune.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83473879 United States 07/10/2022 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Yeah Twitter pissed and moaned that Elon was going to buy it now they are pissed he wont buy it... well twitter eventually agreed to the deal, then musk backed out... and he will now have to pay a 1 billion dollar breakup fee, plus like 100 mil in lawyer fees Twiddler is worth like $35,000,000 or $40,000,000. It's not worth any more than that. The value is based upon how many users it has. It doesn't really have any users. It has no value. They lied and they will pay. |
Dirck de Noorman
User ID: 82671024 United States 07/10/2022 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83473879 You are hilarious! You are using sources that have no integrity, have lied about everything since 2016, and that are bought and paid for. These people would sell their own mothers for a couple of dollars. If you believe them you will believe anything. oh right, so they are lying about the contract you have not seen and they have got it prove where the sources are lying I will wait for your analysis and data showing exactly how those news articles are not true Because Twatter lied! They want to sell him a company of bots talking to each other. Nobody uses the platform. It's a useless platform. The value is based upon lies. He has a case and they don't. If you are too dumb to realize this you know absolutely nothing about contract law. Now go back to playing with your video games on mommy's glowing rectangular brainwash box.. and show me in the contract where it says anything about bots and how if there are bots it makes the deal null and void since you are an expert in contract law, break down the contract and show where musk has a case based on the details of the contract I will wait for you to show me the points in the contract that state elon can back out over bots Think about it. Advertisers and other income-generating functions of social platforms are frequently based off of how many users the platform holds. Nike isn't going to pay a cool million to advertise on a platform that only has 50,000 users, but it might for a few million users. Fraud in reporting those numbers would be a huge issue, not just for Musk, if those bots were counted as real people and not disclosed otherwise. The income stream of Twitter would be vulnerable due to fraud and misrepresentation. No contract that is found to contain fraud or misrepresentation is binding. You don't have to explicitly say "bots" in the contract. All you have to do is prove that they were misrepresented on any number of levels and counted as real people and it's done. Musk will win. Twitter is stupid to sue. Disclosure will ruin them, especially in this whistleblower day and age. Good girls go to heaven ~ Heathen women go wherever the fuck they want |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80942812 Canada 07/10/2022 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says Twitter Stock about to implode Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80454421 Elon Checkmated Twitter Cost to destroy Twitter: $0 Get fucked Twitter no it will cost him 1 billion to get out of the deal and maybe 100 mil in lawyers fees so not $0 when somebody desperately chases you to close the deal you know it wasn't worth it.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83473879 United States 07/10/2022 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 oh right, so they are lying about the contract you have not seen and they have got it prove where the sources are lying I will wait for your analysis and data showing exactly how those news articles are not true Because Twatter lied! They want to sell him a company of bots talking to each other. Nobody uses the platform. It's a useless platform. The value is based upon lies. He has a case and they don't. If you are too dumb to realize this you know absolutely nothing about contract law. Now go back to playing with your video games on mommy's glowing rectangular brainwash box.. and show me in the contract where it says anything about bots and how if there are bots it makes the deal null and void since you are an expert in contract law, break down the contract and show where musk has a case based on the details of the contract I will wait for you to show me the points in the contract that state elon can back out over bots Think about it. Advertisers and other income-generating functions of social platforms are frequently based off of how many users the platform holds. Nike isn't going to pay a cool million to advertise on a platform that only has 50,000 users, but it might for a few million users. Fraud in reporting those numbers would be a huge issue, not just for Musk, if those bots were counted as real people and not disclosed otherwise. The income stream of Twitter would be vulnerable due to fraud and misrepresentation. No contract that is found to contain fraud or misrepresentation is binding. You don't have to explicitly say "bots" in the contract. All you have to do is prove that they were misrepresented on any number of levels and counted as real people and it's done. Musk will win. Twitter is stupid to sue. Disclosure will ruin them, especially in this whistleblower day and age. |
Dirck de Noorman
User ID: 82671024 United States 07/10/2022 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83473879 You are like a broken record. You're just flailing around like a retarded gimp that is screaming at the sky. Your argument is weak. uuh yeah... i keep repeating the same thing cause you dumb fucks keep acting liek musk and tesla didn't use twitter bots to pump tesla stock there's no argument to be had, it's merely a presentation of facts and I will keep presenting those facts every time you cognitive dissonant tards say twitter uses bots and ignore musk using twitter bots That has nothing to do with this specific contract. You might as well just start talking about the weather. You are just wasting everybody's time and wasting the forums bandwidth. and you have read the contract? where in the contract is the clause about bots? so musk and tesla using twitter bots to pump telsa stocks has nothing to do with musk not wanting to buy twitter cause of the twitter bots like the ones he and telsa used to profit? I could create a fashion website and send bots on in here to mind-fuck you into coming and spending your dollars if I wanted to. I could create bots to talk me up on my Twitter account if I wanted, and maybe make millions. I could send bots all over the place to advertise. The key word is "advertise." Now, if someone came along and said, "Hey, look at all of those people out there online talking you up! I want to buy your business for $10,000,000!" and I didn't tell them that all of those people out there talking me up were advertising bots, I'd be in big trouble. There are disclosure laws in contracts. I'm fairly certain that would fall under one of them. Good girls go to heaven ~ Heathen women go wherever the fuck they want |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says (Business Insider) Twitter has hired Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP to sue Elon Musk over his move to terminate a $44 billion deal to acquire the app, sources familiar with the matter tell Bloomberg. Quoting: PURA SANGRE The firm specializes in merger litigation and has connections to the Delaware court system, where the case will be tried. Twitter plans to file a lawsuit against the Tesla CEO early this week, the sources told Bloomberg. Musk himself will be represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The law firm successfully won a defamation trial for the billionaire back in 2019. Representatives for Twitter and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz did not immediately respond to Insider's request to comment. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] Yeah Twitter pissed and moaned that Elon was going to buy it now they are pissed he wont buy it... well twitter eventually agreed to the deal, then musk backed out... and he will now have to pay a 1 billion dollar breakup fee, plus like 100 mil in lawyer fees Twiddler is worth like $35,000,000 or $40,000,000. It's not worth any more than that. The value is based upon how many users it has. It doesn't really have any users. It has no value. They lied and they will pay. and you know this cause you read the contract right and the contract has a bots clause in it right maybe musk shoulda done his research before buying something that costs 44 billion... buyer beware right |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 uuh yeah... i keep repeating the same thing cause you dumb fucks keep acting liek musk and tesla didn't use twitter bots to pump tesla stock there's no argument to be had, it's merely a presentation of facts and I will keep presenting those facts every time you cognitive dissonant tards say twitter uses bots and ignore musk using twitter bots That has nothing to do with this specific contract. You might as well just start talking about the weather. You are just wasting everybody's time and wasting the forums bandwidth. and you have read the contract? where in the contract is the clause about bots? so musk and tesla using twitter bots to pump telsa stocks has nothing to do with musk not wanting to buy twitter cause of the twitter bots like the ones he and telsa used to profit? I could create a fashion website and send bots on in here to mind-fuck you into coming and spending your dollars if I wanted to. I could create bots to talk me up on my Twitter account if I wanted, and maybe make millions. I could send bots all over the place to advertise. The key word is "advertise." Now, if someone came along and said, "Hey, look at all of those people out there online talking you up! I want to buy your business for $10,000,000!" and I didn't tell them that all of those people out there talking me up were advertising bots, I'd be in big trouble. There are disclosure laws in contracts. I'm fairly certain that would fall under one of them. yeah but you can't use twitter to hype your stocks, it is called stock fraud and something the SEC has been all over musk about using twitter to do... that's not advertising, that's stock fraud you know what there also is... a buyer has to do their own research on the products they are gonna buy... called doing your due dilligence if a used car sells you a lemon and you didn't do your research on the car, you can't buy it then go hey you lied! buyer beware, consumer 101 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83473879 United States 07/10/2022 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71221969 Yeah Twitter pissed and moaned that Elon was going to buy it now they are pissed he wont buy it... well twitter eventually agreed to the deal, then musk backed out... and he will now have to pay a 1 billion dollar breakup fee, plus like 100 mil in lawyer fees Twiddler is worth like $35,000,000 or $40,000,000. It's not worth any more than that. The value is based upon how many users it has. It doesn't really have any users. It has no value. They lied and they will pay. and you know this cause you read the contract right and the contract has a bots clause in it right maybe musk shoulda done his research before buying something that costs 44 billion... buyer beware right You have to be the dumbest person on the entire internet. Nobody can explain anything to you. You just know everything. |
Myst~Wyks
User ID: 80122730 United States 07/10/2022 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] I get that, I do. And am not ignoring your post. Musk of course knew about Twitter bots, evidently there is a certain number that is ok. What he apparently did not know was how MANY bots and bot bosses Twitter now has. And evidently Twitter was dishonest with Musk from the start about how many bots they now have, since halfway thru the contract dealings, Musk was like 'hey wait??? just HOW MANY bots DO you have??????' He is NOT going to buy Twitter out if it is crawling with bots! He said he warned them early on. So Musk investigated, and decided oh hell to the no! Very likely much higher amount of bots than feared. I'm no legal-beagle. Just seems to me, that Twitter breached their own contract with Musk as presented by giving a lower number of bots in Twitter to Musk, than there actually are. If the matter of 'the number of bots' wasn't IN the contract, why did Musk complain so early on in the dealings and investigate the number of bots so rapidly? If all that's true, then IMO, Twitter breached contract first, by misleading Musk as to the number of bots. Which then, would allow Musk to cancel out the contract without penalty, would it not? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 oh right, so they are lying about the contract you have not seen and they have got it prove where the sources are lying I will wait for your analysis and data showing exactly how those news articles are not true Because Twatter lied! They want to sell him a company of bots talking to each other. Nobody uses the platform. It's a useless platform. The value is based upon lies. He has a case and they don't. If you are too dumb to realize this you know absolutely nothing about contract law. Now go back to playing with your video games on mommy's glowing rectangular brainwash box.. and show me in the contract where it says anything about bots and how if there are bots it makes the deal null and void since you are an expert in contract law, break down the contract and show where musk has a case based on the details of the contract I will wait for you to show me the points in the contract that state elon can back out over bots Think about it. Advertisers and other income-generating functions of social platforms are frequently based off of how many users the platform holds. Nike isn't going to pay a cool million to advertise on a platform that only has 50,000 users, but it might for a few million users. Fraud in reporting those numbers would be a huge issue, not just for Musk, if those bots were counted as real people and not disclosed otherwise. The income stream of Twitter would be vulnerable due to fraud and misrepresentation. No contract that is found to contain fraud or misrepresentation is binding. You don't have to explicitly say "bots" in the contract. All you have to do is prove that they were misrepresented on any number of levels and counted as real people and it's done. Musk will win. Twitter is stupid to sue. Disclosure will ruin them, especially in this whistleblower day and age. again, musk should have done his research BEFORE he agreed to buy twitter and made the deal he has buyer's remorse cause he raged bought twitter cause the SEC was censoring his stock manipulation pumping tweets and now he is mad he stupidly bought something without thinking about it boo fuckin hoo wealthy billionaire asshole |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78107266 United States 07/10/2022 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says I thought Liberals didn't want Elon to own Twitter? Quoting: GORGLESNARGLE I wish they would make up their minds... i thought you all hated climate change electric car agenda woke people like elon and tesla i wish you'd make up your minds I love electric vehicles, I have had several and as long as I don't drive more than a mile from my farm they are great for getting around. But let's be clear Liberals lost their shit when Elon said he would buy out Twitter and now they are losing their shit because he isn't buying Twitter. Them using lawyers is going to kill Twitter in the long run. let's be clear maga tards lost their shit when elon and the woke climate change agenda tried to make them not buy fossil fuel based cars remind me again who championed elon as a hero fo climate change and bout his teslas to virtue signal to other climate change wokers? Oh right liberals Liberals always lose their shit when they cannot control anyone. |
Dirck de Noorman
User ID: 82671024 United States 07/10/2022 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83473879 That has nothing to do with this specific contract. You might as well just start talking about the weather. You are just wasting everybody's time and wasting the forums bandwidth. and you have read the contract? where in the contract is the clause about bots? so musk and tesla using twitter bots to pump telsa stocks has nothing to do with musk not wanting to buy twitter cause of the twitter bots like the ones he and telsa used to profit? I could create a fashion website and send bots on in here to mind-fuck you into coming and spending your dollars if I wanted to. I could create bots to talk me up on my Twitter account if I wanted, and maybe make millions. I could send bots all over the place to advertise. The key word is "advertise." Now, if someone came along and said, "Hey, look at all of those people out there online talking you up! I want to buy your business for $10,000,000!" and I didn't tell them that all of those people out there talking me up were advertising bots, I'd be in big trouble. There are disclosure laws in contracts. I'm fairly certain that would fall under one of them. yeah but you can't use twitter to hype your stocks, it is called stock fraud and something the SEC has been all over musk about using twitter to do... that's not advertising, that's stock fraud you know what there also is... a buyer has to do their own research on the products they are gonna buy... called doing your due dilligence if a used car sells you a lemon and you didn't do your research on the car, you can't buy it then go hey you lied! buyer beware, consumer 101 You're a dolt, 541. A total dolt. Betcha a pat on the head that Musk wins. I can't stand the guy, but he's going to win. What Musk does with bots is a completely separate, totally irrelevant issue. Perhaps a different lawsuit for a different day, but it doesn't apply at all in regard to this specific contract. Good girls go to heaven ~ Heathen women go wherever the fuck they want |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] I get that, I do. And am not ignoring your post. Musk of course knew about Twitter bots, evidently there is a certain number that is ok. What he apparently did not know was how MANY bots and bot bosses Twitter now has. And evidently Twitter was dishonest with Musk from the start about how many bots they now have, since halfway thru the contract dealings, Musk was like 'hey wait??? just HOW MANY bots DO you have??????' He is NOT going to buy Twitter out if it is crawling with bots! He said he warned them early on. So Musk investigated, and decided oh hell to the no! Very likely much higher amount of bots than feared. I'm no legal-beagle. Just seems to me, that Twitter breached their own contract with Musk as presented by giving a lower number of bots in Twitter to Musk, than there actually are. If the matter of 'the number of bots' wasn't IN the contract, why did Musk complain so early on in the dealings and investigate the number of bots so rapidly? If all that's true, then IMO, Twitter breached contract first, by misleading Musk as to the number of bots. Which then, would allow Musk to cancel out the contract without penalty, would it not? again, then he should have done more research into twitter before he agreed to buy at and signed a contract with a billion dollar breakup fee in it buyer's remorse sucks, we've all been there but if you don't do your research and buy something you regret, that's on you |
Dirck de Noorman
User ID: 82671024 United States 07/10/2022 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says musk is being slammed with a billion dollar breach of contract fee Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 and how do you all ignore this aspect of telsa and musk using twitter bots? "Twitter bots helped build the cult of Elon Musk and Tesla. But who’s creating them?" Over the 10-year study period, of about 1.4 million tweets from the top 400 accounts posting to the “cashtag” $TSLA, 10% were produced by bots. Of 157,000 tweets posted to the hashtag #TSLA, 23% were from bots, the research showed. Kirsch and Chowdhury tracked 186 Tesla-related bot accounts and found that after each was launched, the company’s stock appreciated more than 2%. (They looked at the average stock return for the week previous to the bot’s creation and for the week following.) While Tesla’s market value has increased over the years, the price has seen dramatic ups and downs. The periods around bot creation showed sharp increases, but outside those windows, trading was far more volatile, Chowdhury said. [link to www.latimes.com (secure)] I get that, I do. And am not ignoring your post. Musk of course knew about Twitter bots, evidently there is a certain number that is ok. What he apparently did not know was how MANY bots and bot bosses Twitter now has. And evidently Twitter was dishonest with Musk from the start about how many bots they now have, since halfway thru the contract dealings, Musk was like 'hey wait??? just HOW MANY bots DO you have??????' He is NOT going to buy Twitter out if it is crawling with bots! He said he warned them early on. So Musk investigated, and decided oh hell to the no! Very likely much higher amount of bots than feared. I'm no legal-beagle. Just seems to me, that Twitter breached their own contract with Musk as presented by giving a lower number of bots in Twitter to Musk, than there actually are. If the matter of 'the number of bots' wasn't IN the contract, why did Musk complain so early on in the dealings and investigate the number of bots so rapidly? If all that's true, then IMO, Twitter breached contract first, by misleading Musk as to the number of bots. Which then, would allow Musk to cancel out the contract without penalty, would it not? again, then he should have done more research into twitter before he agreed to buy at and signed a contract with a billion dollar breakup fee in it buyer's remorse sucks, we've all been there but if you don't do your research and buy something you regret, that's on you It's based upon what a reasonable, prudent person would do with regard to that research and what they're capable of doing. It's pretty hard for a reasonable, prudent person to uncover fraud and misrepresentation if the company is hiding it well, which they would because, well, it's fraud and misrepresentation. Go to bed, 541. Good girls go to heaven ~ Heathen women go wherever the fuck they want |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83830541 United States 07/10/2022 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83830541 and you have read the contract? where in the contract is the clause about bots? so musk and tesla using twitter bots to pump telsa stocks has nothing to do with musk not wanting to buy twitter cause of the twitter bots like the ones he and telsa used to profit? I could create a fashion website and send bots on in here to mind-fuck you into coming and spending your dollars if I wanted to. I could create bots to talk me up on my Twitter account if I wanted, and maybe make millions. I could send bots all over the place to advertise. The key word is "advertise." Now, if someone came along and said, "Hey, look at all of those people out there online talking you up! I want to buy your business for $10,000,000!" and I didn't tell them that all of those people out there talking me up were advertising bots, I'd be in big trouble. There are disclosure laws in contracts. I'm fairly certain that would fall under one of them. yeah but you can't use twitter to hype your stocks, it is called stock fraud and something the SEC has been all over musk about using twitter to do... that's not advertising, that's stock fraud you know what there also is... a buyer has to do their own research on the products they are gonna buy... called doing your due dilligence if a used car sells you a lemon and you didn't do your research on the car, you can't buy it then go hey you lied! buyer beware, consumer 101 You're a dolt, 541. A total dolt. Betcha a pat on the head that Musk wins. I can't stand the guy, but he's going to win. What Musk does with bots is a completely separate, totally irrelevant issue. Perhaps a different lawsuit for a different day, but it doesn't apply at all in regard to this specific contract. i bet you musk loses and has to pay the billion dollar break up fee plus attorney's fees so musk using bots on twitter is totally irrelevant to him not wanting to buy twitter cause twitter has bots on it... totally not relevant right that the guy who has benefitted from twitter bots is now mad twitter uses bots and wants to back out of the deal cause twitter has the thing he has used to become one of the wealthiest men ever tooootally irrelevant huh however would a man who used twitter bots for 10 years to hype his stocks know that twitter uses bots??!?!?! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82836082 United States 07/10/2022 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Twitter just hired a big-name law firm to sue Elon Musk for dropping out of $44 billion takeover bid, report says Well, I would say that everything is going as planned. Elon and his people are smart cookies! Twitter will be exposed like never before! Ya thought the Depp/Heard debacle exposed hidden salacious secrets, nahhh, ya ain’t seen nothing yet, this trial will be nuclear bomb type explosive! |