CDC approves Novavax for Covid prevention

It is an adjuvanted spike protein vaccine, the old technology type. It has been under EUA in Europe, and Asia for a few months. Antibody Dependent Enhancement should probably be anticipated in some recipients.

The meeting and voting were on live on the CDC website.

Last Edited by MarPep on 07/19/2022 03:08 PM

What does it do?
Is safe AND effective in prevention of getting the disease?
if not then its not a vaccine

Isn't that supposed to be the FDA's job?

Does "CDC approval" mean a damn thing beside the optics?

. .

About time!!

Been approved for other countries, and for all of Europe, for MONTHS. Every other industrialized western or asian country except Russia and China had already approved it quite some time ago.

I got Novavax since I did NOT WANT an mRNA vaccine, still totally distrust them, and have had no issues since I got it back in February 2021. (also got the booster in January 2022)

I have friends and family members who also did NOT WANT an mRNA vaccine so remain unvaccinated. Now with a more traditional vaccine out there they may now decide to get vaccinated.

If CDC recommended against using the vaccine, then it would essentially not be used at all by any US physician.

Last Edited by MarPep on 07/19/2022 03:45 PM

Do some research on how Novavax is made:

1) Take a virus that only infects insects and spiders

2) Inject it into moths

3) Wait for moths to create spike proteins

4) Harvest the spike proteins from the moths

5) Embed the spike proteins into nanoparticles

6) Voila! You've got Novavax!


Think I am kidding? Look it up for yourselves.

For example, start at 6:00 in this video:

[link to www.redvoicemedia.com (secure)]

Im thinking bout getting it but this keep coming back


[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

How many of the ingredients are hidden and secret? No one trust the medical establishment anymore. I wonder if they are legally immune to any negative side effects?

The first report is about administering a dose of something (probably not Novavax, but rather Moderna) after expiration date. No adverse effects noted.

The second one is difficult to see if any injection was administered. She was taking Zelenko protocol for suspected Covid, but went to ER, got a RX for oral Paxlovid, which is an oral treatment, not a vaccine.

Neither of those VAERS reports make complete sense, and no adverse reaction to medication is reported.

Makes sense, thank you for the help.

On the plus side, your own body will not be producing the spike protein like with mRNA vax forever.

The original vaccines given with SARS1 were killed/attenuated virus--and these all caused the test animals to develop ADE after re-exposure. This new vaccine may not produce the same reaction upon exposure to COV2 as occurred with the SARS1 trials.

I don't plan on getting any vaccine---but if this one proves safe and effective after the next 12 months, it would be the one I chose if I had to have one. Absolute "NO" to the mRNA vaxs.

Similar to how I think, I guess its a wait and see game.

NOVAVAX

Jul 19, 2022

Recommendation follows U.S. FDA Emergency Use Authorization for the Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine, Adjuvanted as a two-dose primary series

FDA has determined that first vaccine lot has met all release specifications and is acceptable for use under Emergency Use Authorization

Novavax expects to ship doses to the U.S. Government-designated distribution center in the coming days

Novavax' vaccine is the first FDA-authorized and ACIP-recommended protein-based COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.

[link to ir.novavax.com (secure)]

.

Thread: Should you get the Novavax vaccine? Absolutely not!

Thread: FDA flags heart issues after taking NOVAVAX vaccine

Yeah but what is REALLY in it?

It has been authorized for emergency use(EUA) not approved. There is a distinct difference.

Fuck the cdc

This boggles my mind that getting vaccinated is still a discussion. Now the "oh thank goodness, it's not an mRNA vax" crowd will line up for an untested NovoVax for a non-existent threat. With a 99.8 % survival rate if infected and at least 5 highly effective therapeutic protocols available including Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, why does anyone give a damn about Covid. Plus those who are vaxxed are getting Covid at much higher rate than unvaxxed so the Vax obviously is less effective than doing nothing.
.

But all are for prevention ?? aren't they ?

Hello shill.

No, you stupid fucking mindless swine. It is NOT OLD TECHNOLOGY!

DO NOT DECEIVE PEOPLE INTO GETTING THIS!

THIS WAS GROWN FROM GENETICALLY MODIFIED INSECT CELLS. IT IT ****NOT**** purified spike protein from the actual coronavirus!!!

[link to www.nebraskamed.com (secure)]

I'd love to take it but wait...the government being honest and transparent? Nahhhhh. Wish they were, it would save a lot of lives, but ya' just can't trust them.

Im not taking nothing, its all graphene poison.

Hey, don't be mean. I get the frustration but MarPep is good peeps.

Like everyone on here, MP is presenting their take on information and we disseminate it and see whats up.

I just want to know how the hell are they still creating vaccines and genetic therapies for a virus that has never been isolated despite now 100s of foia request all exclaiming they have no such sample in any institution.

Your 1st sentence is true. The original non-mRNA efforts at coronavirus vaccines (for the 20 years leading up to covid) were all disastrous. The problem was never solved, at least not publicly. So based on what we actually know from the actual animal studies, it is highly likely that most or all of the recipients of that kind of vaccine will develop ADE and all sorts of other problems that were prevalent in the research animals.

I had read through all of those old studies during early January 2020, as well as all the old studies on prospective treatments (especially chloroquine), and so when Fauci made his first public statements about covid, I had expected him to recount those facts in the scientific literature about the dangerous failure of coronovirus vaccines and the clear signals of prophylaxis and acute treatment benefits associated with chloroquine (especially in comparison to remdesivir, which performed far worse in the studies). I figured he would then say either

1) 'therefore we must focus on chloroquine and other treatments, as well as maximizing physical fitness and mental health'

or

2) 'but we SOLVED that nasty problem with coronovirus vaccines so they don't cause ADE/etc anymore, and here's the explanation and proof for how we did it'

But he didn't say either of those things. Instead he immediately started pushing misrepresentations and outright lies, which seemed very believable to the general public, but which were transparently false to anyone who had actually read and understood the relevant scientific literature.