[liveleak]Caucasians are NOT from the Americas, which means their mere existence in these lands is A CRIMINAL ACT. That makes them CRIMINALS, so according to the law (international law) whatever the indigenous people decide to do them is FAIR GAME. Look at what happened to John Chau. He thought he could "bring the word of Caucasians' fake god" to the Sentinelese. THEY RESPONDED BY FILLING HIM WITH ARROWS. They killed him without mercy and the rest of the world DID NOTHING.
Why not? Because THE SENTINELESE ARE THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF THAT LAND and they have ALL THE RIGHTS. Its like traffic laws. If you hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk you're going to jail. If you hit one that crosses the middle of a highway well, that's life. International law has STRICT stipulations on the behavior of NON-WHITE PEOPLE (aka criminals foreigners), i.e whatever the indigenous say GOES.
So this woman getting kicked in the face will eventually be deemed completely fine and appropriate as the fog of Caucasian racial propaganda lifts and more and more of them realize what a precarious position they hold by continuing to occupy the Americas. Like the Israelis occupy Palestine and get much flack, so too will Caucasians.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82266287 "Native" Americans are from Asia, Darkies are from Africa. It's called migration/exploration.
You have NO RIGHT to tell us where we're from, stupid asshole. We are indigenous to the Americas on account of being the first people here (that are still around). We arrived 38,000 years before the Siberian (although we also are from Asia, much lower than Siberia like Australia, Paupa New Guinea). FUCK YOU!
Then why don't the "Siberians" who were here mention you in any of their history? What was your tribe? Why aren't you in the history of the early Euro settlers like the "Siberians" were? Why is the history "African looking people" that of slavery, but the Siberian people have a history of being here when the Europeans got here and were in their own tribes, fighting with the Europeans?
Caucasians paid them to pretend like they were the only people here. And since they're squatters and invaders just like Caucasians, it was in their best interest to side with Caucasians instead of the people who let them stay here.
Regardless, the Mayans, Olmecs and Aztec PAINTED THEMSELVES. They left depictions of what they look like. They drew THEMSELVES as dark-to-brown skin N3groes, complete with locks and braids just like we wear today, no need to ask the Siberian.
And we ARE in the history of the early Euro settlers. IN FACT we're the ONLY PEOPLE IN THERE because Caucasians didn't discover the Siberian until they went out WEST in the mid 1800s. Before that, everyone they encountered was A N3gro. Your ignorance is on full display.
There is no such thing as "African looking people". Africans do not look like us nor share facial features with us. They don't grow hair like us either. We closely resemble Melanesians, Australian Aborigines, Solomon Islanders, Andaman Islanders and Paupa New Guineans, ALL OF WHOM are N3groes and NONE OF WHOM are Africans.
The Siberian WAS NOT DISCOVERED UNTIL the 1850s. Websters' 1828 dictionary concurs:
[
link to webstersdictionary1828.com]
AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.
Quoting: Websters 1828 DictionaryUntil the mid 1900s the term Copper-colored people was a common appellation for INDIGENOUS AMERICAN N3GROES. SHUT YOUR IGNORANT FUCKING MOUTH YOU INBRED RETARD. You have NO IDEA about the history of this place, YOU ARE NOT FROM HERE and YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to try and play favorites and pit different groups of Americans against each other for your own benefit you STUPID UGLY PIECE OF SHIT! FUCK YOU!
