Mandela effect explained with one photo (nothing to do with AI, or Internet psy-ops)v: (UPDATED)

They are NOT posing wrong.

They are posing EXACTLY like the statue appeared to them,
AT THAT MOMENT.

It has SINCE changed, and ALL RENDERINGS OF IT CHANGED, resulting in this photo looking so strange.

THIS IS THE TRUTH.

It is beyond painful for me to have come to this conclusion.

A LOGICAL mind FORCED into an ILLOGICAL CONCLUSION.

My explanation is more logical and simple, sorry.

People assume incorrectly ALL THE TIME.

"Stones cannot fall from the sky, because there are no stones in the sky!" – Antoine Lavoisier, father of modern chemistry.

All Mandela effects can be explained by people taking an assumption their brain is making as an actual fact.

Ask anyone around you to take a "thinking" pose and most will put a hand on the forehead because it's what most ACTUALLY do.

Now ask them to mimic the thinker, 99% don't have photographic memory so they will simply take the pose they ASSUME the thinker would have.

All Mandela effects are assumptions and the ego refusing the admit it's just an assumption and not an actual photographic memory.

Same reason why people assume Beaten stein. Because -stein is a very common suffix in names while -stein is never seen. So the brain just think it cannot be correct.

Assumptions and ego

Give me any ME example and I'll deconstruct it for you based on assumptions people brains make (because we are wired to do it to think faster)

Nice strawman. Nothing to do with my claims

As Rodin himself described: "What makes my Thinker think is that he thinks not only with his brain, with his knitted brow, his distended nostrils and compressed lips, but with every muscle of his arms, back, and legs, with his clenched fist and gripping toes."

Find a CLENCHED FIST on the current statue.

EXPLAIN how MY BRAIN"S ASSUMPTIONS made Rodin MISTAKENLY describe HIS OWN CREATION.

Now, do you see why The Thinker is a GREAT example of a Mandela Effect?

It just COMPLETELY DESTROYED your FEEBLE ATTEMPT at INTELLIGENT REASONING.

same process - Lavoisier 's quote there is simple, logical - and true (if one dismisses/ignores all knowledge about outer space)

Lavoisier assumed that all meteorites collected over the years were due to idiotic superstitions .. and dismissed the whole phenomenon.

You are doing the exact same thing

Then way are they posing wrong?

Oh yes, somehow it's more likely there are different timelines than the students assuming incorrectly.

Lol

Could you please post the source of that quote? I'm honestly open to it and would consider it a solid proof.

My searches returned only English quotes with no French source, so so far it looks invented. But I would welcome being proven wrong

They are NOT posing wrong.

They are posing EXACTLY like the statue appeared to them,
AT THAT MOMENT.

It has SINCE changed, and ALL RENDERINGS OF IT CHANGED, resulting in this photo looking so strange.

THIS IS THE TRUTH.

It is beyond painful for me to have come to this conclusion.

A LOGICAL mind FORCED into an ILLOGICAL CONCLUSION.

Nope, I never said the ME theory is impossible. I said that based on Occam's razor, it's not the most simple explanation and thus not the most probable.

Occam's razor depends on assumptions.
Occam's razor was well applied in the Lavoisier example. (except his conclusion turned out to be completely untrue)

People often misapply Occam’s razor when they prefer the simplest theory, not the simplest theory that explains all the evidence.

Occam’s razor can be misapplied in many ways:

Not considering all the evidence and what is inherently more likely.
Using it to definitely rule out less likely theories, which may still be true.
Using it as part of a false dilemma and not considering other possible options.

I am looking.

It is all over the internet.

Here is one example:

[link to stringfixer.com (secure)]

They attribute it to National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on November 30, 2006 . Retrieved 12 December 2006 .

Would love to find it in French.

Thanks for the OPEN MIND!!

My theory explains all the evidence.

Feel free to post more ME example and I'll show how they can be traced back to assumptions people make based on their personal experience

My theory explains all the evidence.

Feel free to post more ME example and I'll show how they can be traced back to assumptions people make based on their personal experience

JADR actually posted the French text that I could find on Google (though not the original source) and it's interesting to note Rodin actually said "clenched fists", plural. Which raises more questions than answers.

To me (native French speaker) the original quote seems to be an exaggerated view from Rodin to convey the message of his statue, like most of his statue do actually have exaggerated poses to convey their message more dramatically