The fbi is experiencing a TDS pandemic and should consider locking down to help flatten the bitterness curve | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 83991502 United States 08/11/2022 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The fbi is experiencing a TDS pandemic and should consider locking down to help flatten the bitterness curve They can’t stop thinking about him and keeping him relevant Like girls in third grade that teases the boys. I think there’s a little love affair crush going on here Can’t wait to see how the act around Valentine’s Day! Ooooooooo |
Xeven
User ID: 80683137 United States 08/11/2022 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The fbi is experiencing a TDS pandemic and should consider locking down to help flatten the bitterness curve Someone should make a TDS vaccine. I reserve the right to declare my comments and posts as satire. Nothing I post should be considered or interpreted as advocacy for illegal activity. My comments are designed to inspire critical political thinking. I only mean half of what I say and only say half of what I mean. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78294056 08/11/2022 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The fbi is experiencing a TDS pandemic and should consider locking down to help flatten the bitterness curve Working on that! Covert moral bioenhancement, public health, and autonomy Alexander Zambrano 1 Affiliations expand PMID: 30989673 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12567 Abstract In a recent article in this journal, Parker Crutchfield argues that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, as some authors claim, then it ought to be covert, i.e., performed without the knowledge of the population that is being morally enhanced. Crutchfield argues that since the aim of compulsory moral bioenhancement is to prevent ultimate harm to the population, compulsory moral bioenhancement is best categorized as a public health issue, and should therefore be governed by the norms and values that apply in public health settings. In this article, I argue for two related claims. First, I question the extent to which compulsory moral enhancement should be considered a public health issue that ought to be governed by the norms and values that apply in public health settings. Second, I argue that Crutchfield's argument that covert moral bioenhancement would better respect people's autonomy than an overt program overlooks two important autonomy-based reasons that, in fact, favor an overt moral enhancement program over a covert one [link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 83991502 United States 08/11/2022 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |