The Big Bang has been proven to be false. The James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54328273 United Kingdom 08/14/2022 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The Big Bang has been proven to be false. The James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. There was no big bang or evolution, or we came from apes. There are no such thing as material atoms, electrons, photons, speed of light or dimensions. Check out Ken Wheeler's youtube channel Asphosis.. who explains it very simply. There is only one field, the die-electric field, which breathes between the states of electro-static and magnetism. That's all it is. No such thing as aliens, ET's, only angels and demons. We are not our bodies. Only energy fields exist, vibrating with energy and pressure mediation, with an eternal creative intelligent wisdom powering everything within and around us. Praise the work of our Lord Almighty God Jesus Christ, the supreme loving being we all emanate from. |
Mousse7714
User ID: 83466085 United States 08/14/2022 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The Big Bang has been proven to be false. The James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. So then how did our Universe begin? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32577701 All matter in the known Universe suddenly exploded from a white hole... this already known, isn't it? How else would you describe this, other than a "Big Bang"? Now, all planets, galaxies and solar systems in the known Universe are speeding away from each other, faster than the speed of light. There are entire regions of the Universe that humans will never be able to explore, because they would have to travel faster than the speed of light to reach them. All matter in the Universe is heading toward a super massive black hole at the edge of the lotknown Universe. This is how our Universe will end... that's a known fact, isn't it? No, it was just proven wrong. They have been lying all this time. Everything did not come from a central point. Read the article. The only explanation that makes sense is God created the universe. Of course He did, how is there a conflict between the two? I see no problem believing science and God's creation, what are the contradictions and conundrums? I don't get it either. It all seems like semantics. It's the same difference. Mousse7714 |
jlee2027
User ID: 83427730 United States 08/14/2022 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
4warned
User ID: 81060410 United States 08/14/2022 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The Big Bang has been proven to be false. The James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. The Big Bang has been proven to be false. New James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. Quoting: God created everything! 80405631 The Big Bang Hypothesis - which states the universe has been expanding since it began 14 billion years ago in a hot and dense state - is contradicted by the new James Webb Space Telescope images, writes Eric Lerner. [link to iai.tv (secure)] Wonder if "Sabine Hossenfelder" will do a YT about this.She always seems ready to point out gaps in knowledge. I seem to remember one presentation where she predicted that cosmology not physics was likely to produce the next breakthrough. Looks like she might've been correct. Grateful life participant |
Anonymous User ID: 78062131 United States 08/15/2022 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
a theoretical physicist User ID: 79511251 United Kingdom 08/31/2022 06:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: The Big Bang has been proven to be false. The James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. The Big Bang has been proven to be false. New James Webb space telescope images have proven it never happened. Quoting: God created everything! 80405631 The Big Bang Hypothesis - which states the universe has been expanding since it began 14 billion years ago in a hot and dense state - is contradicted by the new James Webb Space Telescope images, writes Eric Lerner. [link to iai.tv (secure)] The Big Bang theory has NOT been disproved by the James Webb telescope. All it had shown is that large galaxies did not grow by the merger of small galaxies, as SOME cosmologists previously thought. There could be a reason for this. Perhaps dark matter in young galaxies repels the dark matter in other galaxies, preventing them from merging. The article cited makes several false deductions from these observations because it wants to prove the Big Bang theory. It is unreliable because it is clearly biassed. For example, it says: "With few or no mergers, there is no way tiny galaxies could grow to be a hundred times bigger. Therefore, they were not tiny to begin with, and thus the optical illusion predicted from the expanding universe hypothesis does not exist. But no illusion means no expansion: the illusion is an unavoidable prediction from expansion. Thus, the panic among Big Bang supporters. Tiny and smooth galaxies mean no expansion and thus no Big Bang." This is nonsense. The statement: "and thus the optical illusion predicted from the expanding universe hypothesis does not exist" is a false inference. The statement: "Tiny and smooth galaxies mean no expansion" is utterly ridiculous. It means no such thing. All that has been disproved is the notion that large galaxies grew by the merging of small ones. In reality, they grew because they had supermassive black holes at their centres, whereas small galaxies did not grow because they only had small black holes at their centres. This thread has been generated by an non-mainstream article clearly written by opponents of the Big Bang theory who have picked up on observations contradicting a particular view about the growth of galaxies and grotesquely turned them into evidence that they want to dupe readers into believing that it disproves Big Bang. These observations by the Webb telescope do nothing of the sort. The so-called "Panic" appearing in the title of one scientific paper is NOT evidence that astronomers are panicking about the implications for the Big Bang theory. Instead, it describes the shock some had when a model of galaxy formation they had accepted was shown to be inconsistent with the data. That has NOTHING to do with Big Bang. But the word is used falsely to mislead readers into thinking that astronomers are in panic about Big Bang theory itself, whereas they are NOT, if one reads the paper more carefully than Eric Lerner did when he wrote his iai.tv article. As the author of a book called "The Big Bang never happened", he has deliberately misinterpreted the observations in order to vindicate his own views about the Big Bang theory. Because of this, he is NOT an objective writer on the subject. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81031829 United States 08/31/2022 07:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |