Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,050 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 894,051
Pageviews Today: 1,220,239Threads Today: 341Posts Today: 5,509
10:18 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Bigoted New York Times Enlists White, All-Male Legal Scholars To Attack Latina, Female Judge In Trump Raid Dispute

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23415018
United States
09/07/2022 12:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bigoted New York Times Enlists White, All-Male Legal Scholars To Attack Latina, Female Judge In Trump Raid Dispute
"The point of a special master isn’t to thwart the investigation. It’s to ensure that the constitutional rights and reputation of a private citizen haven’t been and won’t be infringed upon, in the event that federal agents seized more than what they were legally entitled to. The investigation, which apparently centers on confidential government information and how Trump handled it since leaving the White House, will proceed sooner or later, one way or another. There is absolutely no way Democrats are letting that one go.

Savage also said his gang of legal minds believed that Cannon, who is of Cuban descent, “showed unusual solicitude” toward Trump, who nominated her to the court in 2020. In other words, she seemed motivated by personal interest rather than legal soundness. Perhaps they wish Canon would have been less emotional."
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23415018
United States
09/07/2022 12:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigoted New York Times Enlists White, All-Male Legal Scholars To Attack Latina, Female Judge In Trump Raid Dispute
Link - [link to thefederalist.com (secure)]

"Assisting Savage was a mix of seven lawyers and legal scholars, all but one of whom were white men, to doubt Cannon’s acumen and sincerity. (I wouldn’t mention their skin color, but leftists always do it so why not?)

University of Texas law professor Stephen I. Vladeck: “An unprecedented intervention by a federal district judge…”

Paul Rosenzweig, former Homeland Security official: “untenable…”

New York University law professor Ryan Goodman: “Judge Cannon had a reasonable path she could have taken. … Instead, she chose a radical path.” (Goodman might even consider telling Cannon that she should calm down.)

NYU legal scholar Peter Shane: “[Her] opinion seems oblivious to the nature of executive privilege.” (What a bimbo, that Cannon!)

Duke University law professor Samuel Buell: “This ruling is laughably bad, and the written justification is even flimsier.”"





GLP