Christianity/Bible ask me anything

Ok I have some questions.

Have you read the Bible cover to cover? If so, which version(s)?

And…

Genesis 19:3 - Lot is protecting the two angels that came to stay with him from “all the young and old male citizens of Sodom,” who wanted to have sex with them. Lot protects the angels but offers his virgin daughters to be taken for sex instead.


Also, Genesis 19:38 says Lot had sex with his daughters.


I’m not trying to be crude but…WTF?????? How is this allowed??

Thanks. It's at least an old Hebrew midrash. I was mistaken about it being written in 1149; same name but totally different/unrelated book.

I messaged you.

Was the queen of England the restrainer?

No idea what that means.

Ok I have some questions.

Have you read the Bible cover to cover? If so, which version(s)?

Yes. KJV. And I think I read the NIV or ESV cover to cover. I currently read the NASB.

And…

Genesis 19:3 - Lot is protecting the two angels that came to stay with him from “all the young and old male citizens of Sodom,” who wanted to have sex with them. Lot protects the angels but offers his virgin daughters to be taken for sex instead.


Also, Genesis 19:38 says Lot had sex with his daughters.


I’m not trying to be crude but…WTF?????? How is this allowed??

Lot was not a hero. His daughters actually seduced him. My theory is that they came from such a sexually immoral and depraved society that it didn't seem that weird for them to incapacitate their father and essentially rape him.

Listen dude (or whatever pronoun you use), I'm slow sometimes, but I eventually catch on. You're not a Christian. I see that now. You're just here to troll. So, yes, I will continue to delete your posts.

I would ask or tell you to leave, but I know you won't. You'll just keep coming back here in an effort to undermine me in any way possible. There's quite a few of you on this site.

You know what the difference is between me and you? I can admit when I'm wrong or may be wrong. Example: I cannot guarantee modalism, but, scripturally, it's the most verifiable nature of God. I'm not going to die on that hill though. I don't believe in pre-Tribulation rapture, but is it worth fighting about?

If you really are a Christian, think about it. What good comes from being in constant conflict with a brother and being unable to walk away to preserve love - over beliefs that cannot be confirmed or denied? It's not Christ-like, I know that for a fact.

Never confuse Christianity with being a doormat. Stand for whats right, even if you need to do the unthinkable. Dont be a coward.

As long as the "unthinkable" is what Christ commanded you to do, I agree.

The unthinkable, per Christ, usually involves loving your enemy and blessing him.

Nice thread OP, and good job with the questions! Keep up the good work!

My only question is after reading the KJV majority text, why did you move onto the bogus westcott and Hort bible versions (NIV, NASB, ESV) which uses the Vaticanus translation and comes from occultists Westcott and Hort? There are serious problems with those duds.

Great book:

Gail Riplinger-New Age Bible Versions:
AN EXHAUSTIVE DOCUMENTATION EXPOSING THE MESSAGE.MEN AND Manuscripts moving Mankind to The ANTICHRIST'S ONE WORLD RELIGION

Excellent video, Kent Hovind-Why the King James Bible is the Word of God

What do you mean by 'allowed'?

The daughters' actions 'prove' the point of how bad Sodom and the other cities were.

Lot's wife defied the angels - she paid the price.

I think the only reason Lot and his family were saved was as a 'favor' to Abraham - nothing more.

Lot certainly never showed any respect towards God - even offered his daughters to the crazed croud outside his door.

Who does BS like that?

Why is cannibalism allowed for high ranking members of church and their loyal gimps? Adenochrome??

Why is cannibalism allowed for high ranking members of church and their loyal gimps? Adenochrome??

Troll question. No Christians are committing cannibalism in the church nor are they allowed to.

Thank you for your response. We just have to realize those new versions have the handprint of the alexandrian pagans like Origen and Plato, as well as the roman catholic church on them. The NIV was endorsed by crypto satanist Billy Graham and the roman catholic church, as the manuscripts they used come from their pagan forefathers, hence the Vaticanus translation and Alexandrian, used in the NIV, NASB, etc. The king james on the other hand comes from the majority text, over 5000 plus manuscripts compared and matched from all over the earth, Gods preserved Word. Indeed there have been translation errors with the KJV as well, but the westcott and hort is plain brutal. I can count on my KJV.

I dont want to flood your excellent thread with verse comparisons, so i will just give you a few:

Ephesians 3:9

King James Version

9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

Ephesians 3:9

New International Version

9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things. OMIT BY JESUS CHRIST

The NIV is embracing evolution with their word choices, "ages past" rather than beginning of the world. Did God create all things BY JESUS CHRIST, yes indeed, if i was reading the NIV i wouldnt know that.

There are hundreds of examples in Gail Riplingers book where they intentionally deny the divinity of Christ.

Also, for understanding prophecy, the NIV and new age perversions hide many truths. Notice in Rev 17 "the 7 heads are the 7 mountains on which the woman sits" then after it mentions 7 kings, whereas the NIV says the 7 heads ARE ALSO 7 KINGS. Now not only do i have to look for the 7 mountain city, i also need to look for 7 king city. Guess what, Rome is the 7 mountain/hill city, they intentionally blurred the truth to hide the roman harlot:

Revelation 17:9-10

King James Version

9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.

Revelation 17:9-10

New International Version

9 “This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. 10 They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for only a little while.

The modern books of Jasher, Enoch, Jubilees, etc are gnostic catholic works as well and cant be relied upon. When King James was asked why he never included those books in his cannon, he said "I am not a papist". Just because a modern publisher includes additional books in their publications does not mean King James originally did in his own.

Gail Riplinger-New age bible versions

Anyhow, keep up hard work OP! Your charity work sounds amazing and i can tell you have a great heart! I pray our One and only Saviour Jesus Christ will bless you!

NASB is considered the most accurate word-for-word translation. I like it, but it's weird sometimes.

Don't strain at gnats and swallow camels though. None of them are perfect.

If you scroll down this page, there is a bar that rates translations by accuracy vs idea. A good reference point:

[link to www.olivetree.com (secure)]

.

Last Edited by Psychedelic Mashed Potatoes on 09/29/2022 03:42 PM

Does the mark of the beast go IN the hand or forehead, or ON the hand or forehead?

Revelation 13:16

King James Version

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

Revelation 13:16

New American Standard Bible

16 And he causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads,

Particuliar changes such as that can lead a believer to accept the mark of the beast. Dangerous stuff.

They're pretty close and their verbiage means the exact same thing. What's the problem?

Like I said, look at this webpage and scroll down about 2/3rds of the way. There is a bar that evaluates the different translations based upon criteria of literal vs paraphrasing and word-for-word vs idea-for-idea:

[link to www.olivetree.com (secure)]

.

It's not going to be an accident. You're going to have to worship something that is not God and be compliant with something that is characteristically evil.

It's almost certain that you will have to openly denounce the Lord Jesus Christ to be part of it.

Islam = anti-Christ
Communism = anti-Christ
Hinduism = anti-Christ
Israel = anti-Christ
Globalism = anti-Christ

That's most of the world presently.

I'm not trying to be disrespectful of the people whose posts I delete. There are a lot of Bible/Christianity threads on GLP. I offer this one as a specific ask me anything thread. I appreciate your input and agree with a lot that is said, it's just not what this thread is for.