relevant

i will delete my accusation

Maybe God created chaos because he grew tired of knowing?

I know that discovery is in my nature. and as I get older I enjoy sleep like when I was young and dreamt of being older . Bell Curve Observations…and Bucky balls sent your way ol’chap.

slaves

could be anything
saying stuff for its effect and never because you believe what you said
is what i see

You are not wrong.

[Brackets]




[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Enveloped by the void.

Don’t say much so when it happens the words become more intricate and hit more notes…pull more strings. Amplified by emotion or carelessness or a combination of the two. A stoic and his web.

Coincidentally I think evil created sensationalism.

I’ll stop now with my brain fog. Thanks esy.

gods and saints may struggle with that notion

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

strange to me that after many thousands of years of culture that this is the nomal in 2024 frequently

Last Edited by aethyr on 03/21/2024 07:18 PM

shortening good into god was the failure most likley

Last Edited by aethyr on 03/21/2024 08:12 PM

What is "OT"?

We can thank Hollyweird/"entertainment" and propaganda machines for modern culture.

Not forgetting Hollyweird's shady beginnings, with Louis LePrince being disappeared and his tech stolen.....


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

I find myself thinking of those crucial points of that era, if Edison had not been involved...I have to make myself stop(!). Seems useless.

That's interesting. And when.

Too bad the linguistically inclined here are strictly Abrahamic.

I don't think I've ever noticed, but that reminds me, you wouldn't say that your primary definition for "faith", is "lazy"?

its never to late for us to find out

i have noticed this everywhere
its a mental block
everyone requires a beginning to avoid the notion that eternity never possess a beginning
whithout a beginning in something modern man cant explain himself is the impression i get

Last Edited by aethyr on 03/22/2024 06:16 PM

for some reason people seem willing to explore eternity going forward but they can never explore the notion that eternity is eternal backwards

That is true isn't it :)

Bolded/\ and I'm wondering if they had intended to turn themselves into a "religion". But then again, the Bible Code thumbdrive

"Sumerians originally practiced a polytheistic religion with anthropomorphic deities representing cosmic and terrestrial forces in their world" "or of many gods in human form, which were specific to each city-state"

"The deities in the Sumerian pantheon included An, the god of the heavens, Enlil, the god of wind and storm, AnKi Enki, the god of water and human culture"
-Google

Yes and funny there/\, considering they were literally alive and so controlling/maintaining territories and "forces"

Fayyum was Anunnaki? "Could be 100,000 years old"

Oh remember it lines up to different poles.

They must have been able to forsee a pole shift?

Oh that is interesting and I can't recall ever questioning anyone about that either lol. Probably because I have a similar affliction idk. Nice and tidy, God created. :) "Eternal backwards" may help.

When it comes down to it, does anyone have a very good explanation of consciousness appearing and then materializing into things and itself and so on, other than that?

from my point of view the internet through glp has enabled me to get what i want and restructure my lifesyle accordingly in every aspect to enable me to enjoy what i got

with that in mind there is no complaint from me with any of it including hollyweird and social media

enjoying off and on line because of it

that is being sorted out in explaination through on line disclosure over managed linear time in conjunction with military intelligence and supernatural with alien cooperation

it seems to be the emotional block is the notion that we are structured to function within eternity as eternity because we are eternity

which is true
we are

i feel a new thread title arising that enables me to display my new avatar name on it

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]